当少即是多。

Asiaweek Pub Date : 1993-01-01 DOI:10.2144/000113309

Sean Burton, —Jay Bilas

{"title":"当少即是多。","authors":"Sean Burton, —Jay Bilas","doi":"10.2144/000113309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thailand's world rank, based on its total fertility rate (the average number of children that will be born per child-bearing woman, given current trends) of 2.3, has decreased from 70 in 1960 to 33 in 1991 (the country with the lowest rate is ranked 1st). By 1989, it was also listed 7th for world's fastest growing economy. This is due, perhaps, to the improved health and education that accompanies a lower fertility rate. This news article lists total fertility rates and world rankings for the years 1960 and 1991 for 76 countries. Total fertility rates alone are listed for an additional 7 countries.","PeriodicalId":84229,"journal":{"name":"Asiaweek","volume":"1 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When less is more.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Burton, —Jay Bilas\",\"doi\":\"10.2144/000113309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thailand's world rank, based on its total fertility rate (the average number of children that will be born per child-bearing woman, given current trends) of 2.3, has decreased from 70 in 1960 to 33 in 1991 (the country with the lowest rate is ranked 1st). By 1989, it was also listed 7th for world's fastest growing economy. This is due, perhaps, to the improved health and education that accompanies a lower fertility rate. This news article lists total fertility rates and world rankings for the years 1960 and 1991 for 76 countries. Total fertility rates alone are listed for an additional 7 countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asiaweek\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asiaweek\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2144/000113309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiaweek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2144/000113309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

泰国的世界排名是根据其总生育率(根据目前的趋势，每个育龄妇女将生下的孩子的平均数量)为2.3，从1960年的70下降到1991年的33(生育率最低的国家排名第一)。到1989年，它也被列为世界上增长最快的经济体的第七名。这也许是由于伴随着较低生育率的健康和教育的改善。这篇新闻文章列出了76个国家1960年和1991年的总生育率和世界排名。另外还列出了7个国家的总生育率。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

When less is more.

Thailand's world rank, based on its total fertility rate (the average number of children that will be born per child-bearing woman, given current trends) of 2.3, has decreased from 70 in 1960 to 33 in 1991 (the country with the lowest rate is ranked 1st). By 1989, it was also listed 7th for world's fastest growing economy. This is due, perhaps, to the improved health and education that accompanies a lower fertility rate. This news article lists total fertility rates and world rankings for the years 1960 and 1991 for 76 countries. Total fertility rates alone are listed for an additional 7 countries.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asiaweek

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Letting the poor speak. AIDS explosion. Time bomb along the Mekong calls for a regional solution. A spirited response: Malaysia's AIDS activists woo Muslim clerics. The abortion dilemma. What's behind one of the world's highest rates. The nations: Vietnam. The polygamy debate. Many women are saying that one is enough.