《回到未来:反恐战争及其对公民自由的影响

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Public Law Review Pub Date : 2004-08-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2631409
D. Meagher
{"title":"《回到未来:反恐战争及其对公民自由的影响","authors":"D. Meagher","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2631409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at the capacity of the Australian Constitution to protect the civil liberties of a small number of citizens and would be citizens whose lives have been forever changed by recent acts of terror and the legislative and executive actions taken by the Commonwealth in response to them. Whilst the Constitution contains a number of provisions and principles protective of civil liberties, in most instances they cannot resist government action expressly aimed at curtailing or infringing individual rights and freedoms. To this end, steps ought to be taken to strengthen existing institutions and mechanisms capable of providing meaningful civil rights scrutiny of government legislation. The comment begins with an examination of the close historical and legal parallels that exist between the present day and the Cold War era and suggests how the High Court might interpret the defence power should a terrorist attack occur on Australian soil. It concludes with a proposed reform. It involves vesting Chapter III courts with the power to measure Commonwealth laws against the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights when determining a legal controversy. This may operate to secure better legislative outcomes from a civil liberties perspective without compromising the supremacy of Parliament.","PeriodicalId":43092,"journal":{"name":"Public Law Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to the Future: The War on Terror and its Impact on Civil Liberties\",\"authors\":\"D. Meagher\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2631409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article looks at the capacity of the Australian Constitution to protect the civil liberties of a small number of citizens and would be citizens whose lives have been forever changed by recent acts of terror and the legislative and executive actions taken by the Commonwealth in response to them. Whilst the Constitution contains a number of provisions and principles protective of civil liberties, in most instances they cannot resist government action expressly aimed at curtailing or infringing individual rights and freedoms. To this end, steps ought to be taken to strengthen existing institutions and mechanisms capable of providing meaningful civil rights scrutiny of government legislation. The comment begins with an examination of the close historical and legal parallels that exist between the present day and the Cold War era and suggests how the High Court might interpret the defence power should a terrorist attack occur on Australian soil. It concludes with a proposed reform. It involves vesting Chapter III courts with the power to measure Commonwealth laws against the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights when determining a legal controversy. This may operate to secure better legislative outcomes from a civil liberties perspective without compromising the supremacy of Parliament.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Law Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"177-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2631409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2631409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文着眼于澳大利亚宪法保护少数公民和未来公民的公民自由的能力,这些公民的生活因最近的恐怖行为和联邦为此采取的立法和行政行动而永远改变了。虽然《宪法》包含了一些保护公民自由的条款和原则,但在大多数情况下,它们无法抵制政府明确旨在限制或侵犯个人权利和自由的行为。为此目的,应采取步骤加强现有的机构和机制,以便对政府立法进行有意义的公民权利审查。这篇评论首先考察了当今与冷战时期之间存在的密切的历史和法律相似之处,并提出了高等法院在澳大利亚领土上发生恐怖袭击时可能如何解释防卫权。最后提出了一项改革建议。它涉及赋予第三章法院在确定法律争议时根据《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》衡量联邦法律的权力。从公民自由的角度来看,这可能会确保更好的立法结果,而不会损害议会的至高无上地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Back to the Future: The War on Terror and its Impact on Civil Liberties
This article looks at the capacity of the Australian Constitution to protect the civil liberties of a small number of citizens and would be citizens whose lives have been forever changed by recent acts of terror and the legislative and executive actions taken by the Commonwealth in response to them. Whilst the Constitution contains a number of provisions and principles protective of civil liberties, in most instances they cannot resist government action expressly aimed at curtailing or infringing individual rights and freedoms. To this end, steps ought to be taken to strengthen existing institutions and mechanisms capable of providing meaningful civil rights scrutiny of government legislation. The comment begins with an examination of the close historical and legal parallels that exist between the present day and the Cold War era and suggests how the High Court might interpret the defence power should a terrorist attack occur on Australian soil. It concludes with a proposed reform. It involves vesting Chapter III courts with the power to measure Commonwealth laws against the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights when determining a legal controversy. This may operate to secure better legislative outcomes from a civil liberties perspective without compromising the supremacy of Parliament.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impairment and Limited State Immunity Parliamentary Appointment or Popular Election? Breaking the Impasse on Models for an Australian 'Westminster Republic' The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency Limited Leverage: Federal Remedies and Policing Reform The Voting Rights Ratchet: Rowe v. Electoral Commissioner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1