信任信念对网络产品推荐使用期望确认与满意度关系的中介作用

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT South East Asian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706
Muhammad Ashraf, N. Jaafar, Ainin Sulaiman
{"title":"信任信念对网络产品推荐使用期望确认与满意度关系的中介作用","authors":"Muhammad Ashraf, N. Jaafar, Ainin Sulaiman","doi":"10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online Product Recommendations (OPRs) are increasingly available to online customers as a value-added self-service in evaluating and choosing a product. Research has highlighted several advantages that customers can gain from using OPRs. However, the realization of these advantages depends on whether and to what extent customers embrace and fully utilise them. The relatively low OPR usage rate indicates that customers have not yet developed trust in OPRs’ performance. Past studies also have established that satisfaction is a valid measure of system performance and a consistent significant determinant of users’ continuous system usage. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the mediation effect of trusting beliefs on the relationship between expectation-confirmation and satisfaction. The proposed research model is tested using data collected via an online survey from 626 existing users of OPRs. The empirical results revealed that social-psychological beliefs (perceived confirmation and trust) are significant contributors to customer satisfaction with OPRs. Additionally, trusting beliefs partially mediate the impact of perceived confirmation on customer satisfaction. Moreover, this study validates the extensions of the interpersonal trust construct to trust in OPRs and examines the nomological validity of trust in terms of competence, benevolence, and integrity. The findings provide a number of theoretical and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":41895,"journal":{"name":"South East Asian Journal of Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"180606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mediation Effect of Trusting Beliefs on the Relationship Between Expectation-Confirmation and Satisfaction with the Usage of Online Product Recommendation\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ashraf, N. Jaafar, Ainin Sulaiman\",\"doi\":\"10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online Product Recommendations (OPRs) are increasingly available to online customers as a value-added self-service in evaluating and choosing a product. Research has highlighted several advantages that customers can gain from using OPRs. However, the realization of these advantages depends on whether and to what extent customers embrace and fully utilise them. The relatively low OPR usage rate indicates that customers have not yet developed trust in OPRs’ performance. Past studies also have established that satisfaction is a valid measure of system performance and a consistent significant determinant of users’ continuous system usage. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the mediation effect of trusting beliefs on the relationship between expectation-confirmation and satisfaction. The proposed research model is tested using data collected via an online survey from 626 existing users of OPRs. The empirical results revealed that social-psychological beliefs (perceived confirmation and trust) are significant contributors to customer satisfaction with OPRs. Additionally, trusting beliefs partially mediate the impact of perceived confirmation on customer satisfaction. Moreover, this study validates the extensions of the interpersonal trust construct to trust in OPRs and examines the nomological validity of trust in terms of competence, benevolence, and integrity. The findings provide a number of theoretical and practical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"180606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/SEAM.V10I1.7706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在线产品推荐(OPRs)越来越多地提供给在线客户,作为评估和选择产品的增值自助服务。研究强调了客户可以从使用opr中获得的几个优势。然而,这些优势的实现取决于客户是否接受和在多大程度上充分利用这些优势。相对较低的OPR使用率表明客户尚未对OPR的绩效产生信任。过去的研究也表明,满意度是系统性能的有效衡量标准,也是用户持续使用系统的重要决定因素。因此,本研究旨在探讨信任信念在期望-确认与满意度关系中的中介作用。通过对626名现有opr用户的在线调查收集数据,对提出的研究模型进行了测试。实证结果表明,社会心理信念(感知确认和信任)是OPRs客户满意度的重要贡献者。此外,信任信念部分中介了感知确认对顾客满意度的影响。此外,本研究还验证了人际信任建构的延伸,并从能力、仁慈和诚信三个方面检验了信任的法理效度。这些发现提供了许多理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Mediation Effect of Trusting Beliefs on the Relationship Between Expectation-Confirmation and Satisfaction with the Usage of Online Product Recommendation
Online Product Recommendations (OPRs) are increasingly available to online customers as a value-added self-service in evaluating and choosing a product. Research has highlighted several advantages that customers can gain from using OPRs. However, the realization of these advantages depends on whether and to what extent customers embrace and fully utilise them. The relatively low OPR usage rate indicates that customers have not yet developed trust in OPRs’ performance. Past studies also have established that satisfaction is a valid measure of system performance and a consistent significant determinant of users’ continuous system usage. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the mediation effect of trusting beliefs on the relationship between expectation-confirmation and satisfaction. The proposed research model is tested using data collected via an online survey from 626 existing users of OPRs. The empirical results revealed that social-psychological beliefs (perceived confirmation and trust) are significant contributors to customer satisfaction with OPRs. Additionally, trusting beliefs partially mediate the impact of perceived confirmation on customer satisfaction. Moreover, this study validates the extensions of the interpersonal trust construct to trust in OPRs and examines the nomological validity of trust in terms of competence, benevolence, and integrity. The findings provide a number of theoretical and practical implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic Orientation and Absorptive Capacity: The Mediating Role Of Functional Conflict Unveiling the Dynamics of Expectation, Flow, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction: Drivers of Continued Subscription Intentions Among Netflix Users Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Employees' Creativity with Psychological Empowerment as Mediator Sustainability Disclosure in The Malaysian Construction Sector: The Effect of Community and Media Legitimacies Does Reputation Lead to Student Loyalty? The Case of a Private Higher Education Institution, a State University, and a Local College
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1