从命令与控制到协作与服从:汽车安全监管的转型

IF 1.2 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW Yale Journal on Regulation Pub Date : 2015-12-14 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2703370
J. Mashaw, David L. Harfst
{"title":"从命令与控制到协作与服从:汽车安全监管的转型","authors":"J. Mashaw, David L. Harfst","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2703370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Created in 1966 primarily as a rulemaking body empowered to force the technology of motor vehicle safety, by the late 1970's the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) had largely abandoned its rulemaking mission in favor of the aggressive recall of \"defective\" motor vehicles. That first period adaptation was driven by devastating losses in pre-enforcement judicial review proceedings combined with enthusiastic judicial embrace of the agency's recall efforts. Congressional reaction mimicked the signals from the courts, and the Reagan administration's regulatory reform and relief programs of the 1980's further solidified NHTSA's revised agenda. Prodded by congressional mandates, beginning in1991, but largely of 21st century origin, NHTSA has returned to rulemaking in the last two decades, but in a largely illusory form. Rather than forcing new technologies, the agency has largely required the diffusion of existing technologies already in widespread use -- technologies that might well have reached universal deployment in the absence of the agency's rules. Recalls (which have no demonstrable effect on motor vehicle safety) have continued at increasingly high levels and have been combined with consumer information campaigns, the encouragement of state behavior modification efforts, and agency-industry agreements, to round out NHTSA's emerging model of \"cooperative regulation\". Whether or not this strategy has substantial effects in promoting motor vehicle safety, NHTSA's accommodating posture has resulted in congressional and OMB approval and industry acceptance without litigation. This article describes the evolution of motor vehicle safety regulation and interprets the agency's transformation as an almost perfect adaptation to a legal culture skeptical of ex ante coercive restraints on individual or firm conduct and accepting of post hoc compensatory or punitive action when that conduct fails to live up to broad social norms.","PeriodicalId":46196,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal on Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Command and Control to Collaboration and Deference: The Transformation of Auto Safety Regulation\",\"authors\":\"J. Mashaw, David L. Harfst\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2703370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Created in 1966 primarily as a rulemaking body empowered to force the technology of motor vehicle safety, by the late 1970's the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) had largely abandoned its rulemaking mission in favor of the aggressive recall of \\\"defective\\\" motor vehicles. That first period adaptation was driven by devastating losses in pre-enforcement judicial review proceedings combined with enthusiastic judicial embrace of the agency's recall efforts. Congressional reaction mimicked the signals from the courts, and the Reagan administration's regulatory reform and relief programs of the 1980's further solidified NHTSA's revised agenda. Prodded by congressional mandates, beginning in1991, but largely of 21st century origin, NHTSA has returned to rulemaking in the last two decades, but in a largely illusory form. Rather than forcing new technologies, the agency has largely required the diffusion of existing technologies already in widespread use -- technologies that might well have reached universal deployment in the absence of the agency's rules. Recalls (which have no demonstrable effect on motor vehicle safety) have continued at increasingly high levels and have been combined with consumer information campaigns, the encouragement of state behavior modification efforts, and agency-industry agreements, to round out NHTSA's emerging model of \\\"cooperative regulation\\\". Whether or not this strategy has substantial effects in promoting motor vehicle safety, NHTSA's accommodating posture has resulted in congressional and OMB approval and industry acceptance without litigation. This article describes the evolution of motor vehicle safety regulation and interprets the agency's transformation as an almost perfect adaptation to a legal culture skeptical of ex ante coercive restraints on individual or firm conduct and accepting of post hoc compensatory or punitive action when that conduct fails to live up to broad social norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale Journal on Regulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale Journal on Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2703370\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal on Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2703370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

美国国家公路安全管理局(NHTSA)成立于1966年,最初是作为一个制定规则的机构,被授权强制执行机动车辆安全技术,到20世纪70年代末,它基本上放弃了制定规则的使命,转而支持积极召回“有缺陷”的机动车辆。第一阶段的调整是由执行前司法审查程序的重大损失以及司法部门对该机构召回工作的热情支持推动的。国会的反应模仿了法院发出的信号,里根政府在20世纪80年代的监管改革和救济计划进一步巩固了NHTSA修订后的议程。在1991年开始的国会授权的推动下,NHTSA在过去的二十年里又回到了制定规则的位置,但主要是以一种虚幻的形式。该机构没有强制采用新技术,而是在很大程度上要求推广已经广泛使用的现有技术——如果没有该机构的规定,这些技术很可能已经得到普遍应用。召回(对机动车辆安全没有明显影响)继续以越来越高的水平进行,并与消费者信息宣传活动、鼓励国家行为纠正努力以及机构-行业协议相结合,使NHTSA的新兴“合作监管”模式更加完善。无论这一策略是否对提高汽车安全有实质性影响,NHTSA的包容姿态已经导致国会和OMB的批准和行业接受而没有诉讼。本文描述了机动车安全法规的演变,并将该机构的转变解释为对一种法律文化的几乎完美适应,这种文化对个人或公司行为的事前强制性限制持怀疑态度,并在行为不符合广泛的社会规范时接受事后赔偿或惩罚行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Command and Control to Collaboration and Deference: The Transformation of Auto Safety Regulation
Created in 1966 primarily as a rulemaking body empowered to force the technology of motor vehicle safety, by the late 1970's the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) had largely abandoned its rulemaking mission in favor of the aggressive recall of "defective" motor vehicles. That first period adaptation was driven by devastating losses in pre-enforcement judicial review proceedings combined with enthusiastic judicial embrace of the agency's recall efforts. Congressional reaction mimicked the signals from the courts, and the Reagan administration's regulatory reform and relief programs of the 1980's further solidified NHTSA's revised agenda. Prodded by congressional mandates, beginning in1991, but largely of 21st century origin, NHTSA has returned to rulemaking in the last two decades, but in a largely illusory form. Rather than forcing new technologies, the agency has largely required the diffusion of existing technologies already in widespread use -- technologies that might well have reached universal deployment in the absence of the agency's rules. Recalls (which have no demonstrable effect on motor vehicle safety) have continued at increasingly high levels and have been combined with consumer information campaigns, the encouragement of state behavior modification efforts, and agency-industry agreements, to round out NHTSA's emerging model of "cooperative regulation". Whether or not this strategy has substantial effects in promoting motor vehicle safety, NHTSA's accommodating posture has resulted in congressional and OMB approval and industry acceptance without litigation. This article describes the evolution of motor vehicle safety regulation and interprets the agency's transformation as an almost perfect adaptation to a legal culture skeptical of ex ante coercive restraints on individual or firm conduct and accepting of post hoc compensatory or punitive action when that conduct fails to live up to broad social norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FOIA’s Common Law Empiricism and Privacy Policies in the Restatement of Consumer Contract Law New Tech v. New Deal: Fintech as a Systemic Phenomenon Presidential Administration in a Regime of Separated Powers: An Analysis of Recent American Experience Eliminating Conflicts of Interests in Banks: The Significance of the Volcker Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1