意义社会学:作为本体论范式的教会在诺斯替主义与正统对立中的角色

Q3 Arts and Humanities Religiovedenie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.5-16
V. S. Levytskyy, Adaptation
{"title":"意义社会学:作为本体论范式的教会在诺斯替主义与正统对立中的角色","authors":"V. S. Levytskyy, Adaptation","doi":"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.5-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this article is on the confrontation between Gnostic teachings and Christianity. This problem became the subject of special studies in various humanitarian discourses, but not so often in philosophical ones. Moreover, the struggle of Gnosticism and Orthodoxy was the struggle between two fundamentally different worldviews - the dualism, which is classical for mythological communities, characteristic of ancient thinking, and theocentric monism, which emerged from this struggle as the winner and in which the foundations of a natural ontology were laid. A philosophical analysis of this confrontation deepens the understanding of philosophical problems, which include the question of the nature of social reality, the mechanisms of its construction and maintenance. In this regard, Gnosticism and Christianity can be represented not only as competing religious systems and worldviews but also as different value-semantic universes that protect various “ontological canons”...","PeriodicalId":36158,"journal":{"name":"Religiovedenie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOCIOLOGY OF MEANING: THE ROLE OF THE CHURCH IN THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN GNOSTICISM AND ORTHODOXY AS ONTOLOGICAL PARADIGMS\",\"authors\":\"V. S. Levytskyy, Adaptation\",\"doi\":\"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.5-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus of this article is on the confrontation between Gnostic teachings and Christianity. This problem became the subject of special studies in various humanitarian discourses, but not so often in philosophical ones. Moreover, the struggle of Gnosticism and Orthodoxy was the struggle between two fundamentally different worldviews - the dualism, which is classical for mythological communities, characteristic of ancient thinking, and theocentric monism, which emerged from this struggle as the winner and in which the foundations of a natural ontology were laid. A philosophical analysis of this confrontation deepens the understanding of philosophical problems, which include the question of the nature of social reality, the mechanisms of its construction and maintenance. In this regard, Gnosticism and Christianity can be represented not only as competing religious systems and worldviews but also as different value-semantic universes that protect various “ontological canons”...\",\"PeriodicalId\":36158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religiovedenie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religiovedenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.5-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.2.5-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的重点是诺斯替教和基督教之间的对抗。这个问题成为各种人道主义话语的专门研究主题,但在哲学话语中并不常见。此外,诺斯替主义和东正教之间的斗争是两种根本不同的世界观之间的斗争——二元论是神话团体的经典,是古代思想的特征,而以神为中心的一元论是从这场斗争中脱颖而出的,它是胜利者,奠定了自然本体论的基础。对这种对立的哲学分析加深了对哲学问题的理解,这些哲学问题包括社会现实的本质问题、社会现实的构建和维持机制问题。在这方面,诺斯替主义和基督教不仅可以表现为相互竞争的宗教体系和世界观,而且可以表现为保护各种“本体论规范”的不同价值-语义宇宙……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOCIOLOGY OF MEANING: THE ROLE OF THE CHURCH IN THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN GNOSTICISM AND ORTHODOXY AS ONTOLOGICAL PARADIGMS
The focus of this article is on the confrontation between Gnostic teachings and Christianity. This problem became the subject of special studies in various humanitarian discourses, but not so often in philosophical ones. Moreover, the struggle of Gnosticism and Orthodoxy was the struggle between two fundamentally different worldviews - the dualism, which is classical for mythological communities, characteristic of ancient thinking, and theocentric monism, which emerged from this struggle as the winner and in which the foundations of a natural ontology were laid. A philosophical analysis of this confrontation deepens the understanding of philosophical problems, which include the question of the nature of social reality, the mechanisms of its construction and maintenance. In this regard, Gnosticism and Christianity can be represented not only as competing religious systems and worldviews but also as different value-semantic universes that protect various “ontological canons”...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Religiovedenie
Religiovedenie Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
N. Berdyaev as a Researcher of the Religious Mysticism of Christianity: The Specificity of the Philosophical Approach Japanese Lotus Sūtra Tradition in Konjaku monogatari shū in Japan Religious Life of the North Manchurian City in Chinese Literature of the First Half of the 20th Century (“The Legend of the Hulan River” by Xiao Hong) Chinese Dragon as a Heavenly Omen Social and Cultural Nature of Religious Fundamentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1