60年后缅因州西部海湾的底栖有孔虫:一项比较物种分布变化的初步研究

Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230
S. A. Nathan, R. Leckie, S. Mabee
{"title":"60年后缅因州西部海湾的底栖有孔虫:一项比较物种分布变化的初步研究","authors":"S. A. Nathan, R. Leckie, S. Mabee","doi":"10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Merrimack River paleo-delta formed during the late Pleistocene as post-glacial rebound produced a local low stand in sea level. Subsequent sea-level rise drowned and eroded the paleo-delta, which is now reworked by a variety of processes. This study used benthic foraminifera as a biotic and environmental proxy to evaluate the sand and gravel resources of the paleo-delta. Nineteen box-core sediment samples were collected from the paleo-delta along two east–west depth transects east of the Merrimack River mouth and off Plum Island, Massachusetts. From these samples, 62 species of benthic foraminifera were identified. When compared with distribution studies published over 60 years ago, some species have shifted landward in their distributions (e.g., Adercotryma glomeratum, Cibicides lobatulus, Reophax curtus, Trochammina squamata), while a few exhibited wider and more distal occurrences (e.g., Elphidium excavatum and Elphidium subarcticum). These differences point to variations in the Merrimack River outflow and its effects upon water column nutrient delivery, productivity, and organic matter flux over the past six decades. Other mitigating factors affecting benthic foraminiferal distributions may include increased seafloor disturbance from strong winter storms or fishing activity. Species richness and evenness peak at the delta break, coincident with low species dominance at about 50-m depth. Q-mode cluster analyses show three distinct assemblages: ‘‘shallow’’ (#30-m water depth), ‘‘deep’’ ($40 m), and ‘‘delta edge’’ (,50 m). There are no apparent correlations between foraminiferal distributions and deltaic bedforms or sediment type. This implies that foraminiferal distributions are controlled by other environmental variables other than grain size, such as food availability.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA OF THE WESTERN GULF OF MAINE 60 YEARS LATER: A PILOT STUDY COMPARING CHANGES IN SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Nathan, R. Leckie, S. Mabee\",\"doi\":\"10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Merrimack River paleo-delta formed during the late Pleistocene as post-glacial rebound produced a local low stand in sea level. Subsequent sea-level rise drowned and eroded the paleo-delta, which is now reworked by a variety of processes. This study used benthic foraminifera as a biotic and environmental proxy to evaluate the sand and gravel resources of the paleo-delta. Nineteen box-core sediment samples were collected from the paleo-delta along two east–west depth transects east of the Merrimack River mouth and off Plum Island, Massachusetts. From these samples, 62 species of benthic foraminifera were identified. When compared with distribution studies published over 60 years ago, some species have shifted landward in their distributions (e.g., Adercotryma glomeratum, Cibicides lobatulus, Reophax curtus, Trochammina squamata), while a few exhibited wider and more distal occurrences (e.g., Elphidium excavatum and Elphidium subarcticum). These differences point to variations in the Merrimack River outflow and its effects upon water column nutrient delivery, productivity, and organic matter flux over the past six decades. Other mitigating factors affecting benthic foraminiferal distributions may include increased seafloor disturbance from strong winter storms or fishing activity. Species richness and evenness peak at the delta break, coincident with low species dominance at about 50-m depth. Q-mode cluster analyses show three distinct assemblages: ‘‘shallow’’ (#30-m water depth), ‘‘deep’’ ($40 m), and ‘‘delta edge’’ (,50 m). There are no apparent correlations between foraminiferal distributions and deltaic bedforms or sediment type. This implies that foraminiferal distributions are controlled by other environmental variables other than grain size, such as food availability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/GSJFR.44.3.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

梅里马克河古三角洲形成于晚更新世,形成于冰期后的回弹,形成了局部的低海平面。随后的海平面上升淹没并侵蚀了古三角洲,现在经过各种过程重新塑造。本研究以底栖有孔虫为生物和环境指标,对古三角洲的砂石资源进行了评价。从梅里马克河口以东和马萨诸塞州普拉姆岛附近沿两个东西深度横断面的古三角洲收集了19个盒芯沉积物样本。从这些样本中鉴定出62种底栖有孔虫。与60多年前发表的分布研究相比,一些物种的分布已经向陆地转移(如Adercotryma glomeratum、Cibicides lobatulus、Reophax curtus、Trochammina squamata),而少数物种的分布范围更广、更远(如Elphidium excavatum和Elphidium subarcticum)。这些差异指出了过去60年来梅里马克河流出量的变化及其对水柱养分输送、生产力和有机质通量的影响。影响底栖有孔虫分布的其他缓解因素可能包括强烈冬季风暴或捕鱼活动造成的海底干扰增加。物种丰富度和均匀度在三角洲断裂处达到峰值,与50 m左右的低物种优势度一致。q模式聚类分析显示了三个不同的组合:“浅”(水深30米)、“深”(水深40米)和“三角洲边缘”(水深50米)。有孔虫分布与三角洲床型或沉积物类型之间没有明显的相关性。这意味着有孔虫的分布受其他环境变量控制,而不是粮食大小,如食物供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA OF THE WESTERN GULF OF MAINE 60 YEARS LATER: A PILOT STUDY COMPARING CHANGES IN SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS
The Merrimack River paleo-delta formed during the late Pleistocene as post-glacial rebound produced a local low stand in sea level. Subsequent sea-level rise drowned and eroded the paleo-delta, which is now reworked by a variety of processes. This study used benthic foraminifera as a biotic and environmental proxy to evaluate the sand and gravel resources of the paleo-delta. Nineteen box-core sediment samples were collected from the paleo-delta along two east–west depth transects east of the Merrimack River mouth and off Plum Island, Massachusetts. From these samples, 62 species of benthic foraminifera were identified. When compared with distribution studies published over 60 years ago, some species have shifted landward in their distributions (e.g., Adercotryma glomeratum, Cibicides lobatulus, Reophax curtus, Trochammina squamata), while a few exhibited wider and more distal occurrences (e.g., Elphidium excavatum and Elphidium subarcticum). These differences point to variations in the Merrimack River outflow and its effects upon water column nutrient delivery, productivity, and organic matter flux over the past six decades. Other mitigating factors affecting benthic foraminiferal distributions may include increased seafloor disturbance from strong winter storms or fishing activity. Species richness and evenness peak at the delta break, coincident with low species dominance at about 50-m depth. Q-mode cluster analyses show three distinct assemblages: ‘‘shallow’’ (#30-m water depth), ‘‘deep’’ ($40 m), and ‘‘delta edge’’ (,50 m). There are no apparent correlations between foraminiferal distributions and deltaic bedforms or sediment type. This implies that foraminiferal distributions are controlled by other environmental variables other than grain size, such as food availability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1