{"title":"分析印尼存款比率的财务状况(罗斯福)(罗斯福)(2008-2010年期间的财务比率)","authors":"S. Suryani","doi":"10.21580/economica.2012.2.2.854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to (1) analyze the condition of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of Islamic Banking in Indonesia; (2) analyze the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia; and (3) to analyze the influence of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia. This study took samples at Islamic banks in Indonesia including 11 Islamic Banks (BUS), 23 Business Units of Sharia Banking (UUS). The research data is from Islamic Banking Statistics published by Bank Indonesia from January 2008 until December 2010 (Financial Ratio Study to BUS and UUS period 2008-2010). The number of Islamic banks used is 34 banks. The technique uses simple linear regression analysis with the help of the program EVIEWS version 5. The results of analysis is further illustrated as follows: First : Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of sharia banking has an average of 103.65% during the year 2008, 89.70% in 2009 and 94.37% in 2010. Overall, the average Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) in the three years is about 98.79%. Second: Return on Asset (ROA) is one of the profitability ratio used to measure the effectiveness of the company in generating profit by leveraging its total asset. Based on the description of the variables, it shows the average Return on Asset (ROA) in 2008 is of 1.77%, 1.98% in 2009 and 1.74% in 2010. This result indicates that the average Return on Asset (ROA) in three years of observation is still above the prevailing bank . Third : The result of regression analysis indicates no significant of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) for Return on Assets (ROA). The quantity t count is 0.475 far below the t table 2.032. The result of study differs from the study of Adi Stiawan (2009), but supports the study of Nurkhosidah Siti (2010) and Yuliani (2007). This study shows no significant effect on bank profitability.","PeriodicalId":55734,"journal":{"name":"Economica Jurnal Ekonomi Islam","volume":"2 1","pages":"153-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PENGARUH FINANCING TO DEPOSIT RATIO (FDR) TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS PERBANKANSYARIAH DI INDONESIA (Rasio Keuangan pada BUS dan UUS Periode 2008-2010)\",\"authors\":\"S. Suryani\",\"doi\":\"10.21580/economica.2012.2.2.854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to (1) analyze the condition of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of Islamic Banking in Indonesia; (2) analyze the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia; and (3) to analyze the influence of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia. This study took samples at Islamic banks in Indonesia including 11 Islamic Banks (BUS), 23 Business Units of Sharia Banking (UUS). The research data is from Islamic Banking Statistics published by Bank Indonesia from January 2008 until December 2010 (Financial Ratio Study to BUS and UUS period 2008-2010). The number of Islamic banks used is 34 banks. The technique uses simple linear regression analysis with the help of the program EVIEWS version 5. The results of analysis is further illustrated as follows: First : Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of sharia banking has an average of 103.65% during the year 2008, 89.70% in 2009 and 94.37% in 2010. Overall, the average Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) in the three years is about 98.79%. Second: Return on Asset (ROA) is one of the profitability ratio used to measure the effectiveness of the company in generating profit by leveraging its total asset. Based on the description of the variables, it shows the average Return on Asset (ROA) in 2008 is of 1.77%, 1.98% in 2009 and 1.74% in 2010. This result indicates that the average Return on Asset (ROA) in three years of observation is still above the prevailing bank . Third : The result of regression analysis indicates no significant of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) for Return on Assets (ROA). The quantity t count is 0.475 far below the t table 2.032. The result of study differs from the study of Adi Stiawan (2009), but supports the study of Nurkhosidah Siti (2010) and Yuliani (2007). This study shows no significant effect on bank profitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economica Jurnal Ekonomi Islam\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"153-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economica Jurnal Ekonomi Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2012.2.2.854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economica Jurnal Ekonomi Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2012.2.2.854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
本研究旨在(1)分析印尼伊斯兰银行融资与存款比率(FDR)的状况;(2)分析印尼伊斯兰银行的盈利能力;(3)分析融资存款比(FDR)对印尼伊斯兰银行盈利能力的影响。本研究以印尼的伊斯兰银行为样本,包括11家伊斯兰银行(BUS),伊斯兰银行的23个业务单位(UUS)。研究数据来自印度尼西亚银行2008年1月至2010年12月发布的伊斯兰银行统计数据(2008-2010年期间对BUS和UUS的财务比率研究)。使用的伊斯兰银行数量为34家。该技术使用简单的线性回归分析,并借助程序EVIEWS version 5。分析结果进一步说明如下:第一:伊斯兰银行2008年的融资与存款比率(FDR)平均为103.65%,2009年为89.70%,2010年为94.37%。总体而言,三年的平均融资存款比(FDR)约为98.79%。第二:资产收益率(ROA)是衡量公司利用其总资产产生利润的有效性的盈利比率之一。根据变量的描述,2008年的平均资产收益率为1.77%,2009年为1.98%,2010年为1.74%。这一结果表明,在三年的观察中,平均资产收益率(ROA)仍然高于主流银行。第三:回归分析结果表明融资存款比(FDR)对资产收益率(ROA)影响不显著。数量t计数为0.475,远低于t表2.032。研究结果与Adi Stiawan(2009)的研究结果不同,但支持Nurkhosidah Siti(2010)和Yuliani(2007)的研究。本研究显示对银行盈利能力无显著影响。
ANALISIS PENGARUH FINANCING TO DEPOSIT RATIO (FDR) TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS PERBANKANSYARIAH DI INDONESIA (Rasio Keuangan pada BUS dan UUS Periode 2008-2010)
This study aimed to (1) analyze the condition of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of Islamic Banking in Indonesia; (2) analyze the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia; and (3) to analyze the influence of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of the profitability of s haria banking in Indonesia. This study took samples at Islamic banks in Indonesia including 11 Islamic Banks (BUS), 23 Business Units of Sharia Banking (UUS). The research data is from Islamic Banking Statistics published by Bank Indonesia from January 2008 until December 2010 (Financial Ratio Study to BUS and UUS period 2008-2010). The number of Islamic banks used is 34 banks. The technique uses simple linear regression analysis with the help of the program EVIEWS version 5. The results of analysis is further illustrated as follows: First : Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of sharia banking has an average of 103.65% during the year 2008, 89.70% in 2009 and 94.37% in 2010. Overall, the average Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) in the three years is about 98.79%. Second: Return on Asset (ROA) is one of the profitability ratio used to measure the effectiveness of the company in generating profit by leveraging its total asset. Based on the description of the variables, it shows the average Return on Asset (ROA) in 2008 is of 1.77%, 1.98% in 2009 and 1.74% in 2010. This result indicates that the average Return on Asset (ROA) in three years of observation is still above the prevailing bank . Third : The result of regression analysis indicates no significant of Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) for Return on Assets (ROA). The quantity t count is 0.475 far below the t table 2.032. The result of study differs from the study of Adi Stiawan (2009), but supports the study of Nurkhosidah Siti (2010) and Yuliani (2007). This study shows no significant effect on bank profitability.