方法决定一切:通过研究设计评估结果

D. Mednick
{"title":"方法决定一切:通过研究设计评估结果","authors":"D. Mednick","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To review advantages and disadvantages of commonly used study design strategies and examine issues in interpretation of study results including bias and confounding. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature, established epidemiologic texts. STUDY SELECTION: Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION: Not applicable. DATA SYNTHESIS: The increasing flow of research reports on various therapeutic agents and procedures places managed care pharmacists in the position of evaluating the clinical relevance of new information and its applicability to clinical decision-making in their organizations. A solid understanding of study design strategies such as cohort, case-control, and clinical trials, and the flaws inherent in each, is invaluable for accurate interpretation of any study results. Some design strategies are more appropriate than others to answer certain clinical questions. The randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial is the most reliable design for assessing therapeutic effects of pharmacologic agents. CO...","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method Is Everything: Evaluating Results by Study Design\",\"authors\":\"D. Mednick\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.1.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To review advantages and disadvantages of commonly used study design strategies and examine issues in interpretation of study results including bias and confounding. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature, established epidemiologic texts. STUDY SELECTION: Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION: Not applicable. DATA SYNTHESIS: The increasing flow of research reports on various therapeutic agents and procedures places managed care pharmacists in the position of evaluating the clinical relevance of new information and its applicability to clinical decision-making in their organizations. A solid understanding of study design strategies such as cohort, case-control, and clinical trials, and the flaws inherent in each, is invaluable for accurate interpretation of any study results. Some design strategies are more appropriate than others to answer certain clinical questions. The randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial is the most reliable design for assessing therapeutic effects of pharmacologic agents. CO...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.1.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾常用的研究设计策略的优缺点,并检查研究结果解释中的问题,包括偏倚和混淆。资料来源:临床文献,流行病学文献。研究选择:不适用。数据提取:不适用。数据综合:关于各种治疗药物和程序的研究报告越来越多,使得管理护理药剂师处于评估新信息的临床相关性及其对其组织临床决策的适用性的位置。对研究设计策略(如队列、病例对照和临床试验)及其内在缺陷的深刻理解,对于准确解释任何研究结果都是非常宝贵的。有些设计策略比其他策略更适合回答某些临床问题。随机、对照、盲法临床试验是评估药物治疗效果最可靠的设计。有限公司…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Method Is Everything: Evaluating Results by Study Design
OBJECTIVE: To review advantages and disadvantages of commonly used study design strategies and examine issues in interpretation of study results including bias and confounding. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature, established epidemiologic texts. STUDY SELECTION: Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION: Not applicable. DATA SYNTHESIS: The increasing flow of research reports on various therapeutic agents and procedures places managed care pharmacists in the position of evaluating the clinical relevance of new information and its applicability to clinical decision-making in their organizations. A solid understanding of study design strategies such as cohort, case-control, and clinical trials, and the flaws inherent in each, is invaluable for accurate interpretation of any study results. Some design strategies are more appropriate than others to answer certain clinical questions. The randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial is the most reliable design for assessing therapeutic effects of pharmacologic agents. CO...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing Congestive Heart Failure in the Medicare Risk Population Pharmacy Cost Reduction Imperative at United HealthCare Analyzing Variations in Medication Compliance Related to Individual Drug, Drug Class, and Prescribing Physician Evaluation of Blood Pressure and Adverse Effects in Patients Converted from Lisinopril to Benazepril The Treatment of Depression with Newer Antidepressants: Pharmacology and Efficacy Versus Clinical Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1