宫颈癌肿瘤出芽:与一些临床和病理因素的关系

Q4 Medicine Archive of Oncology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/aoo200124003s
N. Stanulovic, T. Ivković-Kapicl, A. Mandić, B. Gutic
{"title":"宫颈癌肿瘤出芽:与一些临床和病理因素的关系","authors":"N. Stanulovic, T. Ivković-Kapicl, A. Mandić, B. Gutic","doi":"10.2298/aoo200124003s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tumor budding is recognized as an important independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of tumor budding and association with other clinical and pathological features in patients with cervical carcinoma. Material and methods: We evaluated pathohistological data from 91 cervical carcinoma patients (mean age: 53.8 years) who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphatic dissection at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina between January 2010 and December 2018. Tumor budding was evaluated in invasive front of the tumor. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field, three groups were formed: with no budding, with less than 15 buds, and with more than 15 buds. Results: Eighty (87.91%) of evaluated cervical carcinomas were squamous-cell type, while 12.09% were adenocarcinomas. All carcinomas were graded (HG1-HG3). Average diameter of the tumors was 25 mm (81.6% < 4 cm and 18.4% > 4 cm). Metastases in lymph nodes were present in 30 (32.9%) cases. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field there were 35.1% with no budding, 32.9% with less than 15 buds and 37.3% with more than 15 buds. There was a significant association between tumor budding grade and histological grade (p=0.04), as well as with tumor budding grade and the diameter of the tumor (p=0.04). Conclusion: As a quantitative measure of cancer cell dissociation, tumor budding is associated with poor prognosis in cervical carcinoma and should be considered as a prognostic factor.","PeriodicalId":35645,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor budding in cervical carcinoma: Associations with some clinical and pathological factors\",\"authors\":\"N. Stanulovic, T. Ivković-Kapicl, A. Mandić, B. Gutic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/aoo200124003s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tumor budding is recognized as an important independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of tumor budding and association with other clinical and pathological features in patients with cervical carcinoma. Material and methods: We evaluated pathohistological data from 91 cervical carcinoma patients (mean age: 53.8 years) who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphatic dissection at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina between January 2010 and December 2018. Tumor budding was evaluated in invasive front of the tumor. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field, three groups were formed: with no budding, with less than 15 buds, and with more than 15 buds. Results: Eighty (87.91%) of evaluated cervical carcinomas were squamous-cell type, while 12.09% were adenocarcinomas. All carcinomas were graded (HG1-HG3). Average diameter of the tumors was 25 mm (81.6% < 4 cm and 18.4% > 4 cm). Metastases in lymph nodes were present in 30 (32.9%) cases. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field there were 35.1% with no budding, 32.9% with less than 15 buds and 37.3% with more than 15 buds. There was a significant association between tumor budding grade and histological grade (p=0.04), as well as with tumor budding grade and the diameter of the tumor (p=0.04). Conclusion: As a quantitative measure of cancer cell dissociation, tumor budding is associated with poor prognosis in cervical carcinoma and should be considered as a prognostic factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive of Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/aoo200124003s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/aoo200124003s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:肿瘤出芽被认为是结直肠癌重要的独立预后因素。本研究的目的是评估宫颈癌患者肿瘤出芽的分级及其与其他临床和病理特征的关系。材料和方法:我们评估了2010年1月至2018年12月期间在伏伊伏丁那肿瘤研究所接受根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴清扫的91例宫颈癌患者(平均年龄:53.8岁)的病理组织学资料。在肿瘤侵袭性前方评估肿瘤出芽。根据芽数/10高倍场分为无芽、芽数小于15和芽数大于15三组。结果:80例(87.91%)宫颈癌为鳞状细胞型,12.09%为腺癌。所有肿瘤分级(HG1-HG3)。肿瘤平均直径为25mm (< 4cm占81.6%,< 4cm占18.4%)。淋巴结转移30例(32.9%)。从芽数/10高倍场来看,未出芽的占35.1%,少于15芽的占32.9%,大于15芽的占37.3%。肿瘤出芽分级与组织学分级有显著相关性(p=0.04),与肿瘤出芽分级和肿瘤直径有显著相关性(p=0.04)。结论:肿瘤出芽作为癌细胞游离的定量指标,与宫颈癌预后不良有关,应作为预后因素考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tumor budding in cervical carcinoma: Associations with some clinical and pathological factors
Background: Tumor budding is recognized as an important independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the grade of tumor budding and association with other clinical and pathological features in patients with cervical carcinoma. Material and methods: We evaluated pathohistological data from 91 cervical carcinoma patients (mean age: 53.8 years) who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphatic dissection at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina between January 2010 and December 2018. Tumor budding was evaluated in invasive front of the tumor. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field, three groups were formed: with no budding, with less than 15 buds, and with more than 15 buds. Results: Eighty (87.91%) of evaluated cervical carcinomas were squamous-cell type, while 12.09% were adenocarcinomas. All carcinomas were graded (HG1-HG3). Average diameter of the tumors was 25 mm (81.6% < 4 cm and 18.4% > 4 cm). Metastases in lymph nodes were present in 30 (32.9%) cases. Based on the number of bud counts/10 high power field there were 35.1% with no budding, 32.9% with less than 15 buds and 37.3% with more than 15 buds. There was a significant association between tumor budding grade and histological grade (p=0.04), as well as with tumor budding grade and the diameter of the tumor (p=0.04). Conclusion: As a quantitative measure of cancer cell dissociation, tumor budding is associated with poor prognosis in cervical carcinoma and should be considered as a prognostic factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archive of Oncology
Archive of Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Oncology is an international oncology journal that publishes original research, editorials, review articles, case (clinical) reports, and news from oncology (medical, surgical, radiation), experimental oncology, cancer epidemiology, and prevention. Letters are also welcomed. Archive of Oncology is covered by Biomedicina Vojvodina, Biomedicina Serbica, Biomedicina Oncologica, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, ExtraMED and SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Literature review on breast cancer-related lymphedema and related factors SDHx mutations are associated with the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in vagal paragangliomas The role of immunohistochemical analysis in the diagnosis of lung metastases The role of the nutritional status of geriatric patients with gastrointestinal cancer in developing postoperative complications Variable metaplastic entities in pleomorphic adenoma a review of a rare case report with a note on its significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1