{"title":"成人硝普钠相关氰化物中毒——事实还是虚构?对证据和临床相关性的批判性回顾","authors":"P. Abraham","doi":"10.2147/OAJCT.S7573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: Prasad Abraham Department of Pharmacy and Drug information, Box 2061, Grady Health System, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Se, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA Tel +1 404-616-3246 Fax +1 404-616-2228 email pabraham@gmh.edu Abstract: Since its US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1974, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has been fraught with controversy in regards to its safety. Over the years, a growing concern related to SNPs propensity to cause cyanide (CN) toxicity culminated into a series of case reports that led the FDA to develop a black-box warning with dose limitations of ,2 μg/kg/min. These recommendations stemmed also from the reality of the difficulty of obtaining CN levels in a timely manner, as well as the presumed poor correlation of metabolic markers (lactate levels and pH) as it related to the severity of CN toxicity. All these issues have driven practitioners to the use of alternative agents. In this paper, we critically review the cases and the data that led to the development of these restrictive dosing recommendations and reveal several limitations of the data and assumptions that led to these recommendations. We conclude that SNP is still a reasonable agent to use in the management of patients with hypertension today and can safely be used beyond doses of 2 μg/kg/min. Furthermore, in lieu of CN levels, monitoring of lactic acid levels is also a reasonable measure to ensure safety.","PeriodicalId":19500,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJCT.S7573","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium nitroprusside-associated cyanide toxicity in adult patients – fact or fiction? A critical review of the evidence and clinical relevance\",\"authors\":\"P. Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJCT.S7573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence: Prasad Abraham Department of Pharmacy and Drug information, Box 2061, Grady Health System, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Se, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA Tel +1 404-616-3246 Fax +1 404-616-2228 email pabraham@gmh.edu Abstract: Since its US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1974, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has been fraught with controversy in regards to its safety. Over the years, a growing concern related to SNPs propensity to cause cyanide (CN) toxicity culminated into a series of case reports that led the FDA to develop a black-box warning with dose limitations of ,2 μg/kg/min. These recommendations stemmed also from the reality of the difficulty of obtaining CN levels in a timely manner, as well as the presumed poor correlation of metabolic markers (lactate levels and pH) as it related to the severity of CN toxicity. All these issues have driven practitioners to the use of alternative agents. In this paper, we critically review the cases and the data that led to the development of these restrictive dosing recommendations and reveal several limitations of the data and assumptions that led to these recommendations. We conclude that SNP is still a reasonable agent to use in the management of patients with hypertension today and can safely be used beyond doses of 2 μg/kg/min. Furthermore, in lieu of CN levels, monitoring of lactic acid levels is also a reasonable measure to ensure safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJCT.S7573\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S7573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S7573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
通讯:Prasad Abraham Pharmacy and Drug information Department, Box 2061, Grady Health System, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Se, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA Tel +1 404-616-3246 Fax +1 404-616-2228 email pabraham@gmh.edu摘要:自1974年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准硝普钠(SNP)以来,其安全性一直充满争议。多年来,人们对snp引起氰化物(CN)毒性的倾向日益关注,最终形成了一系列病例报告,导致FDA制定了剂量限制为2 μg/kg/min的黑框警告。这些建议还源于难以及时获得CN水平的现实,以及代谢标志物(乳酸水平和pH)与CN毒性严重程度的推定相关性较差。所有这些问题都促使从业者使用替代药物。在本文中,我们批判性地回顾了导致这些限制性剂量建议发展的病例和数据,并揭示了导致这些建议的数据和假设的一些局限性。我们得出的结论是,SNP仍然是一种合理的用于高血压患者管理的药物,并且可以安全地使用超过2 μg/kg/min的剂量。此外,监测乳酸水平代替CN水平也是确保安全的合理措施。
Sodium nitroprusside-associated cyanide toxicity in adult patients – fact or fiction? A critical review of the evidence and clinical relevance
Correspondence: Prasad Abraham Department of Pharmacy and Drug information, Box 2061, Grady Health System, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Dr Se, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA Tel +1 404-616-3246 Fax +1 404-616-2228 email pabraham@gmh.edu Abstract: Since its US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1974, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has been fraught with controversy in regards to its safety. Over the years, a growing concern related to SNPs propensity to cause cyanide (CN) toxicity culminated into a series of case reports that led the FDA to develop a black-box warning with dose limitations of ,2 μg/kg/min. These recommendations stemmed also from the reality of the difficulty of obtaining CN levels in a timely manner, as well as the presumed poor correlation of metabolic markers (lactate levels and pH) as it related to the severity of CN toxicity. All these issues have driven practitioners to the use of alternative agents. In this paper, we critically review the cases and the data that led to the development of these restrictive dosing recommendations and reveal several limitations of the data and assumptions that led to these recommendations. We conclude that SNP is still a reasonable agent to use in the management of patients with hypertension today and can safely be used beyond doses of 2 μg/kg/min. Furthermore, in lieu of CN levels, monitoring of lactic acid levels is also a reasonable measure to ensure safety.