健康保险公司的助推

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Southern California Law Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3009823
W. Epstein
{"title":"健康保险公司的助推","authors":"W. Epstein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3009823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lawmakers are looking for Obamacare savings in the wrong place. Removing sick people from risk pools or reducing health plan benefits — the focus of lawmakers’ attention — would harm vulnerable populations. Instead, reform should target the $750 billion worth of unnecessary care prescribed by doctors, consented to by patients, and paid for by insurers. This Article unravels the mystery of why the insurance market has failed to excise this waste on its own. A toxic combination of mismatched legal incentives, market failures, and industry norms, means that the insurance market cannot solve the problem absent intervention. But a simple nudge could help: steering decision-makers away from unnecessary care while protecting the autonomy of doctors and patients. Insurers should require by contract that providers receive an automated warning before ordering commonly overused interventions. Such computer-driven nudges have been effective in other contexts and would reduce premiums without resorting to the means currently being explored. Because insurers lack appropriate incentives to nudge, the law must mandate it.","PeriodicalId":47124,"journal":{"name":"Southern California Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Health Insurer Nudge\",\"authors\":\"W. Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3009823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lawmakers are looking for Obamacare savings in the wrong place. Removing sick people from risk pools or reducing health plan benefits — the focus of lawmakers’ attention — would harm vulnerable populations. Instead, reform should target the $750 billion worth of unnecessary care prescribed by doctors, consented to by patients, and paid for by insurers. This Article unravels the mystery of why the insurance market has failed to excise this waste on its own. A toxic combination of mismatched legal incentives, market failures, and industry norms, means that the insurance market cannot solve the problem absent intervention. But a simple nudge could help: steering decision-makers away from unnecessary care while protecting the autonomy of doctors and patients. Insurers should require by contract that providers receive an automated warning before ordering commonly overused interventions. Such computer-driven nudges have been effective in other contexts and would reduce premiums without resorting to the means currently being explored. Because insurers lack appropriate incentives to nudge, the law must mandate it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern California Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern California Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009823\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern California Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

立法者们在错误的地方寻找奥巴马医改的储蓄。将病人从风险池中移除或减少健康计划的福利——立法者关注的焦点——将伤害弱势群体。相反,改革应该针对由医生开出、患者同意、保险公司支付的价值7500亿美元的不必要护理。本文将揭开保险市场未能自行消除这种浪费的神秘面纱。不匹配的法律激励、市场失灵和行业规范的有害组合意味着,如果没有干预,保险市场无法解决问题。但一个简单的推动可能会有所帮助:引导决策者远离不必要的护理,同时保护医生和病人的自主权。保险公司应通过合同要求供应商在订购通常被滥用的干预措施之前收到自动警告。这种计算机驱动的推动在其他情况下是有效的,并且可以在不诉诸目前正在探索的手段的情况下降低保费。因为保险公司缺乏适当的激励来推动,法律必须强制执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Health Insurer Nudge
Lawmakers are looking for Obamacare savings in the wrong place. Removing sick people from risk pools or reducing health plan benefits — the focus of lawmakers’ attention — would harm vulnerable populations. Instead, reform should target the $750 billion worth of unnecessary care prescribed by doctors, consented to by patients, and paid for by insurers. This Article unravels the mystery of why the insurance market has failed to excise this waste on its own. A toxic combination of mismatched legal incentives, market failures, and industry norms, means that the insurance market cannot solve the problem absent intervention. But a simple nudge could help: steering decision-makers away from unnecessary care while protecting the autonomy of doctors and patients. Insurers should require by contract that providers receive an automated warning before ordering commonly overused interventions. Such computer-driven nudges have been effective in other contexts and would reduce premiums without resorting to the means currently being explored. Because insurers lack appropriate incentives to nudge, the law must mandate it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Established in 1927, the Southern California Law Review is an independent and autonomous entity. Matters of policy, procedure and content are determined solely by the Editorial Board. All decision making authority is delegated by the Dean of the law school to the Editor-in-Chief. The EIC, in turn, delegates various responsibilities to the Editorial Board and the Staff. Each year the Law Review publishes one volume, which is produced in six separate issues. Each issue normally contains several articles written by outside contributors and several notes written by Southern California Law Review staff members.
期刊最新文献
FAMILIAL SEARCHES, THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, AND GENOMIC CONTROL. The Health Insurer Nudge The Harm Principle and Free Speech The Dual Path Initiative Framework Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1