青少年特发性脊柱侧凸与先天性脊柱侧凸后路融合术后矢状位平衡

Wael Gad, Essam Elmorshidy, Mohammad Gamal Hassan, Moataz El-Sabrout, M. El-Sharkawi
{"title":"青少年特发性脊柱侧凸与先天性脊柱侧凸后路融合术后矢状位平衡","authors":"Wael Gad, Essam Elmorshidy, Mohammad Gamal Hassan, Moataz El-Sabrout, M. El-Sharkawi","doi":"10.21608/ESJ.2021.65846.1174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Although long-segment spinal fusion is well-established in achieving coronal balance in scoliotic deformities, its ability to achieve sagittal balance is variable. In some patients, the fusion needs to be extended to the sacrum/pelvis, which could be challenging. \nPurpose: This study aimed to compare the sagittal balance of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and congenital scoliosis (CS) patients after posterior spinal fusion and to assess the effect of extending the fusion to the sacrum/pelvis on sagittal balance. \nStudy Design: Retrospective cohort study. \nPatients and Methods: The study protocol was approved by our institution review board. All available AIS and CS patients who underwent long-segment posterior spinal fusion were included in this study. Whole spine radiographs were taken at three time points: preoperative, 2-months postoperative, and at 2-year follow-up. The spinopelvic parameters were measured in lateral views. The fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was also recorded. Comparison of the radiological parameters at the three time points between the AIS and CS patients and those with and without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was performed. \nResults: The sagittal vertical axis was significantly higher in CS patients with fusion to the sacrum/pelvis (53.4 mm postoperatively and 54.4 mm at follow-up) than in those without fusion (14.8 mm postoperatively and 11.9 mm at follow-up) and AIS patients with or without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis. In CS patients who needed fusion to the sacrum/pelvis, lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased significantly to 31° postoperatively and 34.1° at follow-up. \nConclusion: AIS patients have a better chance to achieve a normal sagittal alignment than CS patients, especially if the fusion was extended to the sacrum. Patients with CS at the lumbar region have a retroverted pelvis, which is difficult to correct by posterior spinal fusion alone, and an additional posterior osteotomy may be needed to create an adequate LL matching their pelvic incidence. Saving a distal mobile segment preserves a compensatory mechanism and decreases the incidence of postoperative sagittal malalignment. (2020ESJ219)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sagittal Balance After Posterior Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Versus Congenital Scoliosis\",\"authors\":\"Wael Gad, Essam Elmorshidy, Mohammad Gamal Hassan, Moataz El-Sabrout, M. El-Sharkawi\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ESJ.2021.65846.1174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Data: Although long-segment spinal fusion is well-established in achieving coronal balance in scoliotic deformities, its ability to achieve sagittal balance is variable. In some patients, the fusion needs to be extended to the sacrum/pelvis, which could be challenging. \\nPurpose: This study aimed to compare the sagittal balance of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and congenital scoliosis (CS) patients after posterior spinal fusion and to assess the effect of extending the fusion to the sacrum/pelvis on sagittal balance. \\nStudy Design: Retrospective cohort study. \\nPatients and Methods: The study protocol was approved by our institution review board. All available AIS and CS patients who underwent long-segment posterior spinal fusion were included in this study. Whole spine radiographs were taken at three time points: preoperative, 2-months postoperative, and at 2-year follow-up. The spinopelvic parameters were measured in lateral views. The fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was also recorded. Comparison of the radiological parameters at the three time points between the AIS and CS patients and those with and without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was performed. \\nResults: The sagittal vertical axis was significantly higher in CS patients with fusion to the sacrum/pelvis (53.4 mm postoperatively and 54.4 mm at follow-up) than in those without fusion (14.8 mm postoperatively and 11.9 mm at follow-up) and AIS patients with or without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis. In CS patients who needed fusion to the sacrum/pelvis, lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased significantly to 31° postoperatively and 34.1° at follow-up. \\nConclusion: AIS patients have a better chance to achieve a normal sagittal alignment than CS patients, especially if the fusion was extended to the sacrum. Patients with CS at the lumbar region have a retroverted pelvis, which is difficult to correct by posterior spinal fusion alone, and an additional posterior osteotomy may be needed to create an adequate LL matching their pelvic incidence. Saving a distal mobile segment preserves a compensatory mechanism and decreases the incidence of postoperative sagittal malalignment. (2020ESJ219)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2021.65846.1174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2021.65846.1174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景资料:虽然长节段脊柱融合术在脊柱侧凸畸形患者实现冠状面平衡方面已经建立,但其实现矢状面平衡的能力是可变的。在一些患者中,融合需要延伸到骶骨/骨盆,这可能具有挑战性。目的:本研究旨在比较青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)和先天性脊柱侧凸(CS)患者后路脊柱融合术后的矢状位平衡,并评估将融合延伸至骶骨/骨盆对矢状位平衡的影响。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。患者和方法:研究方案经我们的机构审查委员会批准。所有可行的AIS和CS患者均接受了长节段后路脊柱融合术。在术前、术后2个月和随访2年三个时间点拍摄全脊柱x线片。在侧位视图上测量脊柱参数。骶骨/骨盆融合也被记录。比较AIS和CS患者与骶骨/骨盆融合和未融合患者在三个时间点的放射学参数。结果:骶骨/骨盆融合的CS患者(术后53.4 mm,随访54.4 mm)的矢状垂直轴明显高于未融合的患者(术后14.8 mm,随访11.9 mm)和骶骨/骨盆融合或未融合的AIS患者。在需要骶骨/骨盆融合的CS患者中,腰椎前凸(LL)术后显著降低至31°,随访时为34.1°。结论:AIS患者比CS患者有更好的机会实现正常矢状位对齐,特别是当融合扩展到骶骨时。腰椎区的CS患者有骨盆后倾,仅靠后路脊柱融合术难以矫正,可能需要额外的后路截骨术来创造一个与骨盆发生率相匹配的足量腰椎。保留远端可活动节段保留代偿机制,减少术后矢状面不对中发生率。(2020 esj219)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sagittal Balance After Posterior Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Versus Congenital Scoliosis
Background Data: Although long-segment spinal fusion is well-established in achieving coronal balance in scoliotic deformities, its ability to achieve sagittal balance is variable. In some patients, the fusion needs to be extended to the sacrum/pelvis, which could be challenging. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the sagittal balance of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and congenital scoliosis (CS) patients after posterior spinal fusion and to assess the effect of extending the fusion to the sacrum/pelvis on sagittal balance. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: The study protocol was approved by our institution review board. All available AIS and CS patients who underwent long-segment posterior spinal fusion were included in this study. Whole spine radiographs were taken at three time points: preoperative, 2-months postoperative, and at 2-year follow-up. The spinopelvic parameters were measured in lateral views. The fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was also recorded. Comparison of the radiological parameters at the three time points between the AIS and CS patients and those with and without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis was performed. Results: The sagittal vertical axis was significantly higher in CS patients with fusion to the sacrum/pelvis (53.4 mm postoperatively and 54.4 mm at follow-up) than in those without fusion (14.8 mm postoperatively and 11.9 mm at follow-up) and AIS patients with or without fusion to the sacrum/pelvis. In CS patients who needed fusion to the sacrum/pelvis, lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased significantly to 31° postoperatively and 34.1° at follow-up. Conclusion: AIS patients have a better chance to achieve a normal sagittal alignment than CS patients, especially if the fusion was extended to the sacrum. Patients with CS at the lumbar region have a retroverted pelvis, which is difficult to correct by posterior spinal fusion alone, and an additional posterior osteotomy may be needed to create an adequate LL matching their pelvic incidence. Saving a distal mobile segment preserves a compensatory mechanism and decreases the incidence of postoperative sagittal malalignment. (2020ESJ219)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1