找回被盗艺术品?澳大利亚、英国和美国诉讼时效法

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW University of Western Australia Law Review Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.307980

A. Kenyon, Simon Mackenzie

{"title":"找回被盗艺术品?澳大利亚、英国和美国诉讼时效法","authors":"A. Kenyon, Simon Mackenzie","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.307980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statutory limitations periods can bar claims to recover stolen artworks. In doing this, Australian limitations law generally does not consider the conduct of either a dispossessed owner or current possessor of a stolen work. This paper compares Australian, English and US law on the issue and argues that recent reform suggestions should be extended so Australian law does encourage all art market actors to be diligent in their dealings with works that may have been stolen.","PeriodicalId":41927,"journal":{"name":"University of Western Australia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering Stolen Art ? Australian, English and Us Law on Limitations of Action\",\"authors\":\"A. Kenyon, Simon Mackenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.307980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statutory limitations periods can bar claims to recover stolen artworks. In doing this, Australian limitations law generally does not consider the conduct of either a dispossessed owner or current possessor of a stolen work. This paper compares Australian, English and US law on the issue and argues that recent reform suggestions should be extended so Australian law does encourage all art market actors to be diligent in their dealings with works that may have been stolen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Western Australia Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Western Australia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.307980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Western Australia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.307980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

法定时效期间可以阻止追回被盗艺术品的索赔。在这样做时，澳大利亚的时效法通常不考虑被剥夺所有权的所有者或被盗作品的当前所有者的行为。这篇论文比较了澳大利亚、英国和美国在这个问题上的法律，并认为最近的改革建议应该扩展，这样澳大利亚的法律就会鼓励所有艺术市场参与者在处理可能被盗的作品时更加勤奋。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Recovering Stolen Art ? Australian, English and Us Law on Limitations of Action

Statutory limitations periods can bar claims to recover stolen artworks. In doing this, Australian limitations law generally does not consider the conduct of either a dispossessed owner or current possessor of a stolen work. This paper compares Australian, English and US law on the issue and argues that recent reform suggestions should be extended so Australian law does encourage all art market actors to be diligent in their dealings with works that may have been stolen.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊