{"title":"延安之道的生态起源","authors":"Pauline B. Keating","doi":"10.2307/2949830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 'Yan'an Way' is commonly understood as the set of mobilization strategies which emerged from the Chinese Communist Party's rectification drive of 1941-42. In the view of many analysts, these strategies laid the foundation for the Communists' victory in 1949. Mark Selden's pathbreaking 1971 study argued that the Yan'an Way had its origins in a populist 'impulse' within the Communist movement, an impulse which resurfaced among the Party leadership in response to the crises of 1940-41: it was an approach to rural development 'built on egalitarian foundations of participation and community' and was designed to create 'new forms of community'; itwas a strategy epitomized by the 'mass line' a 'mobilization style of leadership' which rejected elitism and bureaucratism.1 The Yan'an Way, Selden argued, was embodied in a series of mass campaigns launched by the Party after 1942, especially the great production drive of 1943-44. More recent scholarship challenges this interpretation on two fronts. The first is its heavy emphasis on the populist features of the Party's post-1942 mobilization methods. Most scholars now agree that any populism in the Yan'an Way was, at best, just one side of a multi-faceted strategy, and that he authoritarianism and state-strengthening ambitions of Communist mobilizers, even in the halcyon Yan'an years, are fairly obvious.2 Secondly, Selden's","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"123 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949830","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ecological Origins of the Yan'an Way\",\"authors\":\"Pauline B. Keating\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2949830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 'Yan'an Way' is commonly understood as the set of mobilization strategies which emerged from the Chinese Communist Party's rectification drive of 1941-42. In the view of many analysts, these strategies laid the foundation for the Communists' victory in 1949. Mark Selden's pathbreaking 1971 study argued that the Yan'an Way had its origins in a populist 'impulse' within the Communist movement, an impulse which resurfaced among the Party leadership in response to the crises of 1940-41: it was an approach to rural development 'built on egalitarian foundations of participation and community' and was designed to create 'new forms of community'; itwas a strategy epitomized by the 'mass line' a 'mobilization style of leadership' which rejected elitism and bureaucratism.1 The Yan'an Way, Selden argued, was embodied in a series of mass campaigns launched by the Party after 1942, especially the great production drive of 1943-44. More recent scholarship challenges this interpretation on two fronts. The first is its heavy emphasis on the populist features of the Party's post-1942 mobilization methods. Most scholars now agree that any populism in the Yan'an Way was, at best, just one side of a multi-faceted strategy, and that he authoritarianism and state-strengthening ambitions of Communist mobilizers, even in the halcyon Yan'an years, are fairly obvious.2 Secondly, Selden's\",\"PeriodicalId\":85646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2949830\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2949830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 'Yan'an Way' is commonly understood as the set of mobilization strategies which emerged from the Chinese Communist Party's rectification drive of 1941-42. In the view of many analysts, these strategies laid the foundation for the Communists' victory in 1949. Mark Selden's pathbreaking 1971 study argued that the Yan'an Way had its origins in a populist 'impulse' within the Communist movement, an impulse which resurfaced among the Party leadership in response to the crises of 1940-41: it was an approach to rural development 'built on egalitarian foundations of participation and community' and was designed to create 'new forms of community'; itwas a strategy epitomized by the 'mass line' a 'mobilization style of leadership' which rejected elitism and bureaucratism.1 The Yan'an Way, Selden argued, was embodied in a series of mass campaigns launched by the Party after 1942, especially the great production drive of 1943-44. More recent scholarship challenges this interpretation on two fronts. The first is its heavy emphasis on the populist features of the Party's post-1942 mobilization methods. Most scholars now agree that any populism in the Yan'an Way was, at best, just one side of a multi-faceted strategy, and that he authoritarianism and state-strengthening ambitions of Communist mobilizers, even in the halcyon Yan'an years, are fairly obvious.2 Secondly, Selden's