重新审视中国农民社会中的大家庭:来自福建一个村庄的调查结果

Huang Shu-min
{"title":"重新审视中国农民社会中的大家庭:来自福建一个村庄的调查结果","authors":"Huang Shu-min","doi":"10.2307/2950025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new consensus eems to be emerging recently among social scientists studying the Chinese peasant family system. By re-examining controversies urrounding the size and composition of the Chinese family and by examining ethnographic data collected in Taiwan over long time spans, Myron Cohen, Li Yih-yuan, and Arthur Wolf took a dramatic departure from the previously dominant line of thought., They argued that the existence of the ideal extended family in China is","PeriodicalId":85646,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","volume":"1 1","pages":"25 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2950025","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Examining the Extended Family in Chinese Peasant Society: Findings from a Fujian Village\",\"authors\":\"Huang Shu-min\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2950025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new consensus eems to be emerging recently among social scientists studying the Chinese peasant family system. By re-examining controversies urrounding the size and composition of the Chinese family and by examining ethnographic data collected in Taiwan over long time spans, Myron Cohen, Li Yih-yuan, and Arthur Wolf took a dramatic departure from the previously dominant line of thought., They argued that the existence of the ideal extended family in China is\",\"PeriodicalId\":85646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2950025\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2950025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of Chinese affairs = Ao chung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2950025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

最近,研究中国农民家庭制度的社会科学家似乎形成了新的共识。通过重新审视围绕中国家庭的规模和组成的争议,以及研究在台湾长期收集的人种学数据,迈伦·科恩、李义远和亚瑟·沃尔夫戏剧性地偏离了之前占主导地位的思想路线。他们认为在中国理想大家庭的存在是不存在的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-Examining the Extended Family in Chinese Peasant Society: Findings from a Fujian Village
A new consensus eems to be emerging recently among social scientists studying the Chinese peasant family system. By re-examining controversies urrounding the size and composition of the Chinese family and by examining ethnographic data collected in Taiwan over long time spans, Myron Cohen, Li Yih-yuan, and Arthur Wolf took a dramatic departure from the previously dominant line of thought., They argued that the existence of the ideal extended family in China is
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back Matter Intersectoral Resource Flows and China's Economic Development.Yuming Sheng Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China.Kenneth Dean The Changing World of Mongolia's Nomads.Melvyn C. Goldstein , Cynthia M. Beall China Turned On: Television, Reform, and Resistance.James Lull
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1