《枕头堡,内战大屠杀》和《公众记忆/红河:美国内战中的枕头堡大屠杀》

Mark K. Christ
{"title":"《枕头堡,内战大屠杀》和《公众记忆/红河:美国内战中的枕头堡大屠杀》","authors":"Mark K. Christ","doi":"10.2307/40028100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory. By John Cimprich. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2005. Pp. ix, 193. Preface, maps, tables, appendices, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War. By Andrew Ward. (New York: Viking, 2005. Pp. xxiii, 531. Preface, acknowledgments, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) Few subjects will raise the ire of Lost Cause traditionalists as much as the April 12, 1864, battle at Fort Pillow, Tennessee. Nathan Bedford Forrest's Confederate cavalry overwhelmed an outpost on bluffs overlooking the Mississippi River that was manned by unionist Tennesseans and black artillerists, many of them former slaves. What followed is probably the Civil War's best-known atrocity, eclipsing similar incidents such as the killing of black troops at Poison Spring, Arkansas, six days later. Fort Pillow remains a bone of contention between those who consider it a massacre and others who deny that interpretation. Were surrendered troops killed on Forrest's orders? Those questions and others are answered in two recent books that explore the events surrounding the fighting at Fort Pillow and its bloody aftermath. John Cimprich's Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory is analytical in its approach, while Andrew Ward's passionate River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War is filled with small details, many of them culled from the statements of participants both immediately after the fight and years later when they were applying for veterans' pensions. While both books discuss the establishment of Fort Pillow, Cimprich's provides more details, including some that will be of particular interest to Arkansawyers. He notes, for instance, that the first garrison at Fort Pillow consisted of Arkansas troops commanded by Patrick Cleburne and that the buildings erected by the first Union garrison were constructed of wood taken from houses the soldiers had torn down in Osceola, Arkansas. Cimprich also devotes a chapter to the naval maneuvers that caused the Confederates to abandon the fort, which Ward does not cover at all. Cimprich, in a crisp, methodical style, scrutinizes the post-battle testimony of survivors of the garrison, the results of a congressional probe of the battle, and postwar southern efforts to portray the fighting at Fort Pillow in a softer light. He offers a detailed historiography that reaches into the 1980s, showing that both the massacre view and the apologist view still have often passionate proponents. …","PeriodicalId":51953,"journal":{"name":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"65 1","pages":"457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40028100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory/River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War\",\"authors\":\"Mark K. Christ\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40028100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory. By John Cimprich. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2005. Pp. ix, 193. Preface, maps, tables, appendices, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War. By Andrew Ward. (New York: Viking, 2005. Pp. xxiii, 531. Preface, acknowledgments, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) Few subjects will raise the ire of Lost Cause traditionalists as much as the April 12, 1864, battle at Fort Pillow, Tennessee. Nathan Bedford Forrest's Confederate cavalry overwhelmed an outpost on bluffs overlooking the Mississippi River that was manned by unionist Tennesseans and black artillerists, many of them former slaves. What followed is probably the Civil War's best-known atrocity, eclipsing similar incidents such as the killing of black troops at Poison Spring, Arkansas, six days later. Fort Pillow remains a bone of contention between those who consider it a massacre and others who deny that interpretation. Were surrendered troops killed on Forrest's orders? Those questions and others are answered in two recent books that explore the events surrounding the fighting at Fort Pillow and its bloody aftermath. John Cimprich's Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory is analytical in its approach, while Andrew Ward's passionate River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War is filled with small details, many of them culled from the statements of participants both immediately after the fight and years later when they were applying for veterans' pensions. While both books discuss the establishment of Fort Pillow, Cimprich's provides more details, including some that will be of particular interest to Arkansawyers. He notes, for instance, that the first garrison at Fort Pillow consisted of Arkansas troops commanded by Patrick Cleburne and that the buildings erected by the first Union garrison were constructed of wood taken from houses the soldiers had torn down in Osceola, Arkansas. Cimprich also devotes a chapter to the naval maneuvers that caused the Confederates to abandon the fort, which Ward does not cover at all. Cimprich, in a crisp, methodical style, scrutinizes the post-battle testimony of survivors of the garrison, the results of a congressional probe of the battle, and postwar southern efforts to portray the fighting at Fort Pillow in a softer light. He offers a detailed historiography that reaches into the 1980s, showing that both the massacre view and the apologist view still have often passionate proponents. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":51953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40028100\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40028100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40028100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

枕头堡,内战大屠杀和公众记忆。约翰·辛普里希著。巴吞鲁日:路易斯安那州立大学出版社,2005。第9页,193。前言、地图、表格、附录、注释、参考书目、索引。29.95美元)。《红河奔流:美国内战中的枕头堡大屠杀》。安德鲁·沃德著。(纽约:维京出版社,2005年)第23页,第531页。前言、致谢、地图、注释、参考书目、索引。29.95美元)。没有什么事情能像1864年4月12日发生在田纳西州枕头堡的战役那样,让失败的传统主义者如此愤怒。内森·贝德福德·福雷斯特(Nathan Bedford Forrest)的邦联骑兵攻占了一个位于悬崖上俯瞰密西西比河的前哨站,该前哨站由田纳西州的联邦主义者和黑人炮兵控制,其中许多人以前是奴隶。接下来发生的可能是南北战争中最著名的暴行,使类似的事件黯然失色,比如六天后在阿肯色州毒泉(Poison Spring)杀害黑人士兵的事件。在认为这是一场大屠杀的人和否认这一解释的人之间,枕头堡仍然是争论的焦点。投降的士兵是按照福雷斯特的命令被杀的吗?这些问题和其他问题在最近出版的两本书中得到了解答,这两本书探讨了围绕在枕头堡的战斗及其血腥后果的事件。John Cimprich的《Pillow堡,内战大屠杀》和《公共记忆》在方法上是分析性的,而Andrew Ward充满激情的《River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre》则充满了小细节,其中许多细节都是从参与者在战斗结束后和几年后申请退伍军人养老金时的陈述中挑选出来的。虽然两本书都讨论了Fort Pillow的建立,但Cimprich提供了更多细节,包括阿肯色州律师特别感兴趣的一些细节。例如,他指出,在皮尤堡的第一批驻军是由帕特里克·克莱本(Patrick cleburn)指挥的阿肯色军队组成的,而第一批联邦驻军建造的房屋是用士兵们从阿肯色奥西奥拉(Osceola)拆除的房屋中取出的木材建造的。辛普里希还专门用了一章来描述导致邦联军放弃堡垒的海军演习,这一点沃德根本没有提到。辛普里希以一种简洁、有条理的风格,仔细研究了守军幸存者的战后证词、国会对这场战斗的调查结果,以及战后南方以更柔和的方式描绘枕头堡战斗的努力。他提供了一份深入到20世纪80年代的详细历史记录,表明大屠杀观点和辩护者观点仍然经常有热情的支持者。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory/River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War
Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory. By John Cimprich. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2005. Pp. ix, 193. Preface, maps, tables, appendices, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War. By Andrew Ward. (New York: Viking, 2005. Pp. xxiii, 531. Preface, acknowledgments, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $29.95.) Few subjects will raise the ire of Lost Cause traditionalists as much as the April 12, 1864, battle at Fort Pillow, Tennessee. Nathan Bedford Forrest's Confederate cavalry overwhelmed an outpost on bluffs overlooking the Mississippi River that was manned by unionist Tennesseans and black artillerists, many of them former slaves. What followed is probably the Civil War's best-known atrocity, eclipsing similar incidents such as the killing of black troops at Poison Spring, Arkansas, six days later. Fort Pillow remains a bone of contention between those who consider it a massacre and others who deny that interpretation. Were surrendered troops killed on Forrest's orders? Those questions and others are answered in two recent books that explore the events surrounding the fighting at Fort Pillow and its bloody aftermath. John Cimprich's Fort Pillow, a Civil War Massacre, and Public Memory is analytical in its approach, while Andrew Ward's passionate River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War is filled with small details, many of them culled from the statements of participants both immediately after the fight and years later when they were applying for veterans' pensions. While both books discuss the establishment of Fort Pillow, Cimprich's provides more details, including some that will be of particular interest to Arkansawyers. He notes, for instance, that the first garrison at Fort Pillow consisted of Arkansas troops commanded by Patrick Cleburne and that the buildings erected by the first Union garrison were constructed of wood taken from houses the soldiers had torn down in Osceola, Arkansas. Cimprich also devotes a chapter to the naval maneuvers that caused the Confederates to abandon the fort, which Ward does not cover at all. Cimprich, in a crisp, methodical style, scrutinizes the post-battle testimony of survivors of the garrison, the results of a congressional probe of the battle, and postwar southern efforts to portray the fighting at Fort Pillow in a softer light. He offers a detailed historiography that reaches into the 1980s, showing that both the massacre view and the apologist view still have often passionate proponents. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cotton Plantation South since the Civil War “Dedicated People” Little Rock Central High School’s Teachers during the Integration Crisis of 1957–1958 Prosperity and Peril: Arkansas in the New South, 1880–1900 “Between the Hawk & Buzzard”:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1