{"title":"老年原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤 (PCNSL) 患者的全因死亡率和肿瘤特异性死亡率趋势:监测、流行病学和最终结果 (SEER) 分析。","authors":"Taylor Furst, Haydn Hoffman, Lawrence S Chin","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Furst, Haydn Hoffman, Lawrence S Chin\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04785-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
All-cause and tumor-specific mortality trends in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis.
Background: Recent primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) literature indicates that younger patients benefit from improved survival; however, this benefit is not shared by those 70+ years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine mortality trends in PCNSL patients 70+ years of age to better understand why improved prognosis has not yet reached this rapidly growing population subset.
Methods: Two thousand seventy-five cases (1973-2012, age at diagnosis 70+ years) within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox Regression analyses. Variables include age at diagnosis, decade of diagnosis (1=1973-1982, 2=1983-1992, 3=1993-2002, 4=2003-2012), sex, race and surgery.
Results: Before stratification, both univariate and multivariate analyses agreed that patients aged 70-74 years at diagnosis lived the longest, while those 85+ years lived the shortest (median±SD; 6.0±0.5 months vs. 2.0±0.2 months, respectively, P<0.0005); women lived longer than men (5.0±0.3 months vs. 4.0±0.3 months, respectively, P=0.01); patients who received surgery (6.0±0.5 months) lived longer than those who did not (contraindicated=1.0±0.5 months, P<0.0005; not performed=4.0±0.3 months, P<0.0005). Univariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than only decade 3 (4.0±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.5, respectively, P=0.008), while multivariate analysis showed decade 4 lived longer than both 2 (5.0±0.8 months, P=0.03) and 3 (P<0.0005). Following stratification, decade and sex no longer influenced survival. Race did not influence survival.
Conclusions: Minimal clinically meaningful improvements in elderly PCNSL patient all-cause and tumor-specific mortality have been made since 1973, while the best predictors of longevity include younger age and surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.