{"title":"她不重,她是我妹妹","authors":"Linda L. Barkacs, Craig B. Barkacs","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvzcz5f5.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The lead plaintiff in the Hooters weight bias case is Cassandra Smith, who interestingly measures out at 5'8\" tall and 132.5 pounds. (Roth, 2010). One popular measure of fitness that has gained currency in recent years is the so-called Body Mass Index (BMI). According to the BMI, which is determined by a combination of height and weight, Smith has a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, which is considered to be in the normal range. How normal? Well, that range is characterized as follows: \"People whose BMI is within 18.5 to 24.9 possess the ideal amount of body weight, associated with living longest, the lowest incidence of serious illness, as well as being perceived as more physically attractive than people with BMI in higher or lower ranges.\" (BMI Calculator, 2010). As a caveat, however, since Body Fat Percentage calculations use total body weight and not estimates of lean muscle mass and fat, BMI cannot determine between the overweight and the more muscular (in other words, you could be incredibly fit and muscular and your BMI would indicate you are overweight). Hooters has never made a secret of the fact that they hire attractive women as waitresses in their chain. In fact, the Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement explicitly establishes that such woman are a part of their identity: We are committed to providing an environment of employee growth and development so that we can provide every guest a unique, entertaining dining experience in a fun and casual atmosphere delivered by attractive, vivacious Hooters Girls while making positive contributions to the communities in which we live [emphasis added]. (Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement, 2008). According to the Hooters website, \"[T]he element of female sex appeal is prevalent in the restaurants, and the company believes the Hooters Girl is as socially acceptable as a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader, a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, or a Radio City Rockette.\" (About Hooters, 2010). NO MALES NEED APPLY The Cassandra Smith case is not the first time Hooters has faced a legal issue involving their practice of featuring only attractive females as servers in their restaurants. In 1991, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) began an investigation of Hooters for discriminatory hiring practices against men. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment based on gender. The EEOC's investigation into this issue lasted for several years. In 1995, Hooters of America struck back: . . . probably the greatest marketing coup came in 1995 when Hooters of America hired a hairy male actor and dressed him in a Hooters waitress outfit to poke fun at allegations that Hooters restaurants discriminated against men. Hooters of America ran full-page advertisements showing \"Vince\" in USA Today and the Washington Post. But more importantly, according to then vicepresident of marketing Michael McNeil, television camera crews showed up at every Hooters restaurant in the United States the same day to do local stories. (See Appendix A, Vince Gigliotti, the Hooters Guy). Moreover, on November 15, 1995, the chain took the EEOC's charge public with a 100 Hooters Girl march on Washington D.C. Hooters received support from the nation's media, calling the charge \"another example of ridiculous government waste,\" and some 500,000 Hooters customers supported the chain by sending postcards to Congress. (About Hooters, 2010). Nevertheless, in 1996, three male plaintiffs launched a lawsuit as representatives of a class action against Hooters \"because of defendant's refusal to hire men to work the 'front of house' positions of wait staff, bartender or host.\" (Latuga v. Hooters). In 1997 the case resulted in a settlement that required no change in policy, acknowledging that \"being female is reasonably necessary\" to the performance of the Hooters Girl's job duties. The most recent challenge to Hooters gender-specific hiring policies came in 2009 when a Texas man brought a class action lawsuit for Hooters' refusal to hire males as waiters. …","PeriodicalId":39163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues","volume":"14 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"She’s Not Heavy, She’s My Sister\",\"authors\":\"Linda L. Barkacs, Craig B. Barkacs\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvzcz5f5.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The lead plaintiff in the Hooters weight bias case is Cassandra Smith, who interestingly measures out at 5'8\\\" tall and 132.5 pounds. (Roth, 2010). One popular measure of fitness that has gained currency in recent years is the so-called Body Mass Index (BMI). According to the BMI, which is determined by a combination of height and weight, Smith has a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, which is considered to be in the normal range. How normal? Well, that range is characterized as follows: \\\"People whose BMI is within 18.5 to 24.9 possess the ideal amount of body weight, associated with living longest, the lowest incidence of serious illness, as well as being perceived as more physically attractive than people with BMI in higher or lower ranges.\\\" (BMI Calculator, 2010). As a caveat, however, since Body Fat Percentage calculations use total body weight and not estimates of lean muscle mass and fat, BMI cannot determine between the overweight and the more muscular (in other words, you could be incredibly fit and muscular and your BMI would indicate you are overweight). Hooters has never made a secret of the fact that they hire attractive women as waitresses in their chain. In fact, the Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement explicitly establishes that such woman are a part of their identity: We are committed to providing an environment of employee growth and development so that we can provide every guest a unique, entertaining dining experience in a fun and casual atmosphere delivered by attractive, vivacious Hooters Girls while making positive contributions to the communities in which we live [emphasis added]. (Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement, 2008). According to the Hooters website, \\\"[T]he element of female sex appeal is prevalent in the restaurants, and the company believes the Hooters Girl is as socially acceptable as a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader, a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, or a Radio City Rockette.\\\" (About Hooters, 2010). NO MALES NEED APPLY The Cassandra Smith case is not the first time Hooters has faced a legal issue involving their practice of featuring only attractive females as servers in their restaurants. In 1991, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) began an investigation of Hooters for discriminatory hiring practices against men. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment based on gender. The EEOC's investigation into this issue lasted for several years. In 1995, Hooters of America struck back: . . . probably the greatest marketing coup came in 1995 when Hooters of America hired a hairy male actor and dressed him in a Hooters waitress outfit to poke fun at allegations that Hooters restaurants discriminated against men. Hooters of America ran full-page advertisements showing \\\"Vince\\\" in USA Today and the Washington Post. But more importantly, according to then vicepresident of marketing Michael McNeil, television camera crews showed up at every Hooters restaurant in the United States the same day to do local stories. (See Appendix A, Vince Gigliotti, the Hooters Guy). Moreover, on November 15, 1995, the chain took the EEOC's charge public with a 100 Hooters Girl march on Washington D.C. Hooters received support from the nation's media, calling the charge \\\"another example of ridiculous government waste,\\\" and some 500,000 Hooters customers supported the chain by sending postcards to Congress. (About Hooters, 2010). Nevertheless, in 1996, three male plaintiffs launched a lawsuit as representatives of a class action against Hooters \\\"because of defendant's refusal to hire men to work the 'front of house' positions of wait staff, bartender or host.\\\" (Latuga v. Hooters). In 1997 the case resulted in a settlement that required no change in policy, acknowledging that \\\"being female is reasonably necessary\\\" to the performance of the Hooters Girl's job duties. The most recent challenge to Hooters gender-specific hiring policies came in 2009 when a Texas man brought a class action lawsuit for Hooters' refusal to hire males as waiters. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzcz5f5.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzcz5f5.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
在猫头鹰餐厅体重歧视一案中,首席原告是卡桑德拉·史密斯,她身高5英尺8英寸,体重132.5磅。(罗斯,2010)。近年来流行的一种健康衡量标准是所谓的身体质量指数(BMI)。根据由身高和体重共同决定的BMI指数,史密斯的BMI在18.5到24.9之间,这被认为是在正常范围内。如何正常吗?这个范围的特征如下:“BMI在18.5到24.9之间的人拥有理想的体重,与寿命最长、患重病的几率最低有关,而且比BMI在更高或更低范围内的人更有吸引力。”(BMI计算器,2010)。然而,需要注意的是,由于体脂百分比的计算使用的是整体体重,而不是对瘦肌肉质量和脂肪的估计,因此BMI不能确定超重和肌肉更发达之间的区别(换句话说,你可能非常健康,肌肉发达,但你的BMI表明你超重)。猫头鹰餐厅从不隐瞒他们雇佣美女做服务员的事实。事实上,《猫头鹰餐厅使命宣言》明确规定,这样的女性是他们身份的一部分:我们致力于提供一个员工成长和发展的环境,这样我们就可以为每一位客人提供一个独特的、有趣的用餐体验,在一个有趣和随意的氛围中,由有吸引力的、活泼的猫头鹰女郎提供,同时为我们所生活的社区做出积极的贡献。(《猫头鹰餐厅使命宣言》,2008)。据Hooters网站称,“女性性感元素在餐厅里很普遍,公司认为Hooters Girl就像达拉斯牛仔队的啦啦队长、体育画报的泳装模特或无线电城的火箭女郎一样被社会所接受。”(关于猫头鹰餐厅,2010)。卡珊德拉·史密斯一案并不是猫头鹰餐厅第一次因为只招漂亮的女性服务员而面临法律问题。1991年,平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)开始调查猫头鹰对男性的歧视性雇佣行为。1964年《民权法案》(CRA)第七章禁止基于性别的就业歧视。平等就业机会委员会对这个问题的调查持续了好几年。1995年,美国猫头鹰餐厅反击:……1995年,美国猫头鹰餐厅(Hooters of America)聘请了一位毛发浓密的男演员,让他穿上了猫头鹰餐厅服务员的服装,以此来取笑人们对猫头鹰餐厅歧视男性的指控。美国猫头鹰在《今日美国》和《华盛顿邮报》上刊登了“文斯”的整版广告。但更重要的是,据当时的营销副总裁迈克尔·麦克尼尔(Michael McNeil)说,电视摄制组在同一天出现在美国的每家猫头鹰餐厅,做当地的报道。(参见附录A, Vince Gigliotti, Hooters Guy)。此外,1995年11月15日,该连锁店将平等就业机会委员会的指控公之于众,在华盛顿特区举行了100名猫头鹰女郎游行。猫头鹰得到了全国媒体的支持,称这项指控是“政府荒谬浪费的又一个例子”,大约50万名猫头鹰顾客通过向国会寄明信片来支持该连锁店。(关于猫头鹰餐厅,2010)。然而,在1996年,三名男性原告作为集体诉讼的代表对猫头鹰餐厅提起诉讼,“因为被告拒绝雇佣男性在前台工作,如服务员、调酒师或主持人。”(Latuga诉Hooters案)。1997年,该案件最终达成和解,不需要改变政策,承认“作为女性是合理必要的”,以履行猫头鹰女郎的工作职责。最近一次针对Hooters性别歧视招聘政策的挑战发生在2009年,当时一名德克萨斯州男子对Hooters拒绝雇佣男性服务员提起集体诉讼。…
INTRODUCTION The lead plaintiff in the Hooters weight bias case is Cassandra Smith, who interestingly measures out at 5'8" tall and 132.5 pounds. (Roth, 2010). One popular measure of fitness that has gained currency in recent years is the so-called Body Mass Index (BMI). According to the BMI, which is determined by a combination of height and weight, Smith has a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, which is considered to be in the normal range. How normal? Well, that range is characterized as follows: "People whose BMI is within 18.5 to 24.9 possess the ideal amount of body weight, associated with living longest, the lowest incidence of serious illness, as well as being perceived as more physically attractive than people with BMI in higher or lower ranges." (BMI Calculator, 2010). As a caveat, however, since Body Fat Percentage calculations use total body weight and not estimates of lean muscle mass and fat, BMI cannot determine between the overweight and the more muscular (in other words, you could be incredibly fit and muscular and your BMI would indicate you are overweight). Hooters has never made a secret of the fact that they hire attractive women as waitresses in their chain. In fact, the Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement explicitly establishes that such woman are a part of their identity: We are committed to providing an environment of employee growth and development so that we can provide every guest a unique, entertaining dining experience in a fun and casual atmosphere delivered by attractive, vivacious Hooters Girls while making positive contributions to the communities in which we live [emphasis added]. (Hooters Restaurant Mission Statement, 2008). According to the Hooters website, "[T]he element of female sex appeal is prevalent in the restaurants, and the company believes the Hooters Girl is as socially acceptable as a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader, a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, or a Radio City Rockette." (About Hooters, 2010). NO MALES NEED APPLY The Cassandra Smith case is not the first time Hooters has faced a legal issue involving their practice of featuring only attractive females as servers in their restaurants. In 1991, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) began an investigation of Hooters for discriminatory hiring practices against men. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment based on gender. The EEOC's investigation into this issue lasted for several years. In 1995, Hooters of America struck back: . . . probably the greatest marketing coup came in 1995 when Hooters of America hired a hairy male actor and dressed him in a Hooters waitress outfit to poke fun at allegations that Hooters restaurants discriminated against men. Hooters of America ran full-page advertisements showing "Vince" in USA Today and the Washington Post. But more importantly, according to then vicepresident of marketing Michael McNeil, television camera crews showed up at every Hooters restaurant in the United States the same day to do local stories. (See Appendix A, Vince Gigliotti, the Hooters Guy). Moreover, on November 15, 1995, the chain took the EEOC's charge public with a 100 Hooters Girl march on Washington D.C. Hooters received support from the nation's media, calling the charge "another example of ridiculous government waste," and some 500,000 Hooters customers supported the chain by sending postcards to Congress. (About Hooters, 2010). Nevertheless, in 1996, three male plaintiffs launched a lawsuit as representatives of a class action against Hooters "because of defendant's refusal to hire men to work the 'front of house' positions of wait staff, bartender or host." (Latuga v. Hooters). In 1997 the case resulted in a settlement that required no change in policy, acknowledging that "being female is reasonably necessary" to the performance of the Hooters Girl's job duties. The most recent challenge to Hooters gender-specific hiring policies came in 2009 when a Texas man brought a class action lawsuit for Hooters' refusal to hire males as waiters. …
期刊介绍:
Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues (JLERI) is an open access publication affiliated to the Allied Business Academies. The Editorial Board of the JLERI exercises complete control over the editorial content and the Journal publishes Bi-Monthly. JLERI invites authors to submit manuscripts throughout the year to get accommodated in any of these editions. The Journal welcomes participants in its associated conferences to submit their manuscripts for accelerated review. JLERI encourages theoretical and empirical research on the ethical decision making process and ethics in business, trade and commerce and focuses on diversified topics related to business laws and ethics. All the manuscripts submitted for publication are subjected to a thorough double blind peer review process. The journal aims to expand the horizon of this scientific discipline by knowledge sharing to further the reader’s understanding of Regulatory Compliances.