甲烷标准气体的大气测量在核磁共振和JMA和相互比较实验

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91
H. Matsueda, Y. Sawa, A. Wada, H. Inoue, K. Suda, Yoshiaki Hirano, K. Tsuboi, S. Nishioka
{"title":"甲烷标准气体的大气测量在核磁共振和JMA和相互比较实验","authors":"H. Matsueda, Y. Sawa, A. Wada, H. Inoue, K. Suda, Yoshiaki Hirano, K. Tsuboi, S. Nishioka","doi":"10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A calibration system of standard gases for atmospheric methane measurements using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was developed at the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) in 1993 and later at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) in 2000. Calibration results for the two systems exhibited good agreement. Although the primary standard gases of the MRI and JMA were prepared independently using the gravimetric method, their methane standard scales were quite similar, (a difference of less than 1 ppb). A comparison of gravimetric standards prepared by several Japanese gas companies showed a methane scale difference within ∼5 ppb relative to the primary standards of the MRI. These gravimetric-scale differences were primarily caused by methane impurities in the diluent air used for standard gas preparation. Long-term storage experiments indicated that the methane contents of standard gases were stable in high-pressure cylinders for 8-9 years. No significant drift of methane was found in any of the standard gases in the MRI; however, to evaluate the stability of the JMA standards, data collected over a longer period of time is required. We evaluated the differences between the methane scales of the MRI and other laboratories based on the previous intercomparison experiments. The differences found in the standard scales used by different laboratories were largely due to the diverse origins of the primary standard gases.","PeriodicalId":39821,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics","volume":"54 1","pages":"91-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methane standard gases for atmospheric measurements at the MRI and JMA and intercomparison experiments\",\"authors\":\"H. Matsueda, Y. Sawa, A. Wada, H. Inoue, K. Suda, Yoshiaki Hirano, K. Tsuboi, S. Nishioka\",\"doi\":\"10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A calibration system of standard gases for atmospheric methane measurements using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was developed at the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) in 1993 and later at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) in 2000. Calibration results for the two systems exhibited good agreement. Although the primary standard gases of the MRI and JMA were prepared independently using the gravimetric method, their methane standard scales were quite similar, (a difference of less than 1 ppb). A comparison of gravimetric standards prepared by several Japanese gas companies showed a methane scale difference within ∼5 ppb relative to the primary standards of the MRI. These gravimetric-scale differences were primarily caused by methane impurities in the diluent air used for standard gas preparation. Long-term storage experiments indicated that the methane contents of standard gases were stable in high-pressure cylinders for 8-9 years. No significant drift of methane was found in any of the standard gases in the MRI; however, to evaluate the stability of the JMA standards, data collected over a longer period of time is required. We evaluated the differences between the methane scales of the MRI and other laboratories based on the previous intercomparison experiments. The differences found in the standard scales used by different laboratories were largely due to the diverse origins of the primary standard gases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"91-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

气象学研究所(MRI)于1993年开发了一套标准气体校准系统,用于使用配备火焰电离检测器的气相色谱仪进行大气甲烷测量,后来在2000年由日本气象厅(JMA)开发。两种系统的标定结果吻合良好。虽然MRI和JMA的主要标准气体是使用重量法独立制备的,但它们的甲烷标准尺度非常相似(差异小于1 ppb)。由几家日本天然气公司准备的重量标准的比较显示,相对于MRI的主要标准,甲烷尺度差异在~ 5 ppb内。这些重量尺度的差异主要是由用于标准气体制备的稀释空气中的甲烷杂质引起的。长期储存实验表明,标准气体甲烷含量在高压气瓶中可保持8 ~ 9年的稳定。在核磁共振成像的任何标准气体中都没有发现明显的甲烷漂移;然而,为了评估JMA标准的稳定性,需要在较长一段时间内收集数据。在前人对比实验的基础上,我们评估了MRI与其他实验室甲烷尺度的差异。在不同实验室使用的标准尺度中发现的差异主要是由于主要标准气体的来源不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methane standard gases for atmospheric measurements at the MRI and JMA and intercomparison experiments
A calibration system of standard gases for atmospheric methane measurements using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was developed at the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) in 1993 and later at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) in 2000. Calibration results for the two systems exhibited good agreement. Although the primary standard gases of the MRI and JMA were prepared independently using the gravimetric method, their methane standard scales were quite similar, (a difference of less than 1 ppb). A comparison of gravimetric standards prepared by several Japanese gas companies showed a methane scale difference within ∼5 ppb relative to the primary standards of the MRI. These gravimetric-scale differences were primarily caused by methane impurities in the diluent air used for standard gas preparation. Long-term storage experiments indicated that the methane contents of standard gases were stable in high-pressure cylinders for 8-9 years. No significant drift of methane was found in any of the standard gases in the MRI; however, to evaluate the stability of the JMA standards, data collected over a longer period of time is required. We evaluated the differences between the methane scales of the MRI and other laboratories based on the previous intercomparison experiments. The differences found in the standard scales used by different laboratories were largely due to the diverse origins of the primary standard gases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics
Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Estimation of JMA-Magnitude for Slow Tsunami Earthquakes Application of an Objective Detection Method of Long-Term Slow Slip Events using GNSS Data: Detection of Short-Term Slow Slip Events and Estimation of Moment Magnitude of Long-Term Slow Slip Events Deepening and Evolution of a Low over the Sea of Japan in Late August in 2016: Interaction of Midlatitude Flows and Typhoon Lionrock (1610) An improved equation for estimating diurnal atmospheric radiation near the surface in Japan Tropical cyclone forecasts for the Western North Pacific with high-resolution atmosphere and coupled atmosphere-ocean models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1