撒丁岛和意大利南部考古,1983 - 1988

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Archaeological Reports-London Pub Date : 1989-11-01 DOI:10.2307/581082
D. Ridgway
{"title":"撒丁岛和意大利南部考古,1983 - 1988","authors":"D. Ridgway","doi":"10.2307/581082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The two sections of this report have not been combined before in AR. In compiling them, I have been acutely aware that it would have been possible and probably easier to devote the space I have for six years' work in two areas to every year in each area. I have, to put it mildly, been highly selective; and where selection is the result of human frailty, whether my own or that of others, I have not hesitated to bow to the inevitable. The two treatments I have prepared below are very different in character. SARDINIA is still essentially terra incognita to all but the most enterprising classical archaeologists. I have therefore paid particular attention to recent advances that illustrate the island's crucial role in episodes hitherto regarded as the exclusive preserve of Aegean specialists—notably the activities of the Bronze Age entrepreneurs from Cyprus and the Levant who (I believe) paved the way for the first Western Greeks of the 8th century. Greek SOUTH ITALY, on the other hand, has long been basically familiar in the outside world—and is more so now than it was when Professor Trendall inaugurated these Reports a generation ago. Accordingly, in the reduced space that I have allowed myself for the flourishing classical scene in Campania, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria, I have usually refrained from summarizing information that is already published: abstracts can never be a substitute for the real thing, and least of all for scholars and students whose institutions (particularly in Britain) can no longer afford to subscribe to even the main journals. Where I have had a choice, I have opted for news of projects that illustrate the methodological kinship that is increasingly being sought between classical and non-classical archaeology: hence the pictures of urban rescue in Naples and notes on field survey around Croton.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581082","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archaeology in Sardinia and South Italy, 1983–88\",\"authors\":\"D. Ridgway\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/581082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The two sections of this report have not been combined before in AR. In compiling them, I have been acutely aware that it would have been possible and probably easier to devote the space I have for six years' work in two areas to every year in each area. I have, to put it mildly, been highly selective; and where selection is the result of human frailty, whether my own or that of others, I have not hesitated to bow to the inevitable. The two treatments I have prepared below are very different in character. SARDINIA is still essentially terra incognita to all but the most enterprising classical archaeologists. I have therefore paid particular attention to recent advances that illustrate the island's crucial role in episodes hitherto regarded as the exclusive preserve of Aegean specialists—notably the activities of the Bronze Age entrepreneurs from Cyprus and the Levant who (I believe) paved the way for the first Western Greeks of the 8th century. Greek SOUTH ITALY, on the other hand, has long been basically familiar in the outside world—and is more so now than it was when Professor Trendall inaugurated these Reports a generation ago. Accordingly, in the reduced space that I have allowed myself for the flourishing classical scene in Campania, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria, I have usually refrained from summarizing information that is already published: abstracts can never be a substitute for the real thing, and least of all for scholars and students whose institutions (particularly in Britain) can no longer afford to subscribe to even the main journals. Where I have had a choice, I have opted for news of projects that illustrate the methodological kinship that is increasingly being sought between classical and non-classical archaeology: hence the pictures of urban rescue in Naples and notes on field survey around Croton.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological Reports-London\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581082\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological Reports-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/581082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Reports-London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本报告的两个部分在AR中从未合并过。在编写它们的过程中,我敏锐地意识到,将我在两个领域工作了六年的空间用于每个领域的每一年,可能是可能的,而且可能更容易。说得委婉点,我是有高度选择性的;如果选择是人类弱点的结果,不管是我自己的还是别人的,我都毫不犹豫地向不可避免的结果低头。下面我准备的两种治疗方法在性质上是非常不同的。除了最有进取心的古典考古学家,撒丁岛基本上仍然是一个未知的领域。因此,我特别关注最近的进展,这些进展说明了该岛在迄今为止被认为是爱琴海专家专属的事件中的关键作用-特别是来自塞浦路斯和黎凡特的青铜器时代企业家的活动(我相信)为8世纪第一个西希腊人铺平了道路。另一方面,希腊南意大利长期以来基本上为外界所熟悉,现在比一代人之前Trendall教授发表这些报告时更为熟悉。因此,在我留给自己的坎帕尼亚、阿普利亚、巴西利卡塔和卡拉布里亚蓬勃发展的古典场景的有限空间里,我通常避免总结已经发表的信息:摘要永远不能代替真实的东西,尤其是对于那些甚至连主要期刊都买不起的机构(特别是在英国)的学者和学生来说。在我有选择的地方,我选择了一些项目的新闻,这些项目说明了古典和非古典考古学之间越来越多地寻求方法论上的亲近感:因此,那不勒斯城市救援的图片和克罗顿周围实地调查的笔记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Archaeology in Sardinia and South Italy, 1983–88
INTRODUCTION The two sections of this report have not been combined before in AR. In compiling them, I have been acutely aware that it would have been possible and probably easier to devote the space I have for six years' work in two areas to every year in each area. I have, to put it mildly, been highly selective; and where selection is the result of human frailty, whether my own or that of others, I have not hesitated to bow to the inevitable. The two treatments I have prepared below are very different in character. SARDINIA is still essentially terra incognita to all but the most enterprising classical archaeologists. I have therefore paid particular attention to recent advances that illustrate the island's crucial role in episodes hitherto regarded as the exclusive preserve of Aegean specialists—notably the activities of the Bronze Age entrepreneurs from Cyprus and the Levant who (I believe) paved the way for the first Western Greeks of the 8th century. Greek SOUTH ITALY, on the other hand, has long been basically familiar in the outside world—and is more so now than it was when Professor Trendall inaugurated these Reports a generation ago. Accordingly, in the reduced space that I have allowed myself for the flourishing classical scene in Campania, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria, I have usually refrained from summarizing information that is already published: abstracts can never be a substitute for the real thing, and least of all for scholars and students whose institutions (particularly in Britain) can no longer afford to subscribe to even the main journals. Where I have had a choice, I have opted for news of projects that illustrate the methodological kinship that is increasingly being sought between classical and non-classical archaeology: hence the pictures of urban rescue in Naples and notes on field survey around Croton.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3 Newsround 2 The work of the British School at Athens, 2021–2022 1 Introduction and overview 5 Recent developments in archaeometallurgical research: the Bronze Age Greek Mainland, Crete, and the Cyclades 8 Recent archaeological work in the Cyclades (Geometric to Hellenistic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1