采访游击队女孩,堤坝行动机器(DAM!)和有毒的奶子

K. Raizada, Guerrilla Girls (Group of artists), DAM! : Dyke Action Machine (Organization), Toxic Titties (Group of artists)
{"title":"采访游击队女孩,堤坝行动机器(DAM!)和有毒的奶子","authors":"K. Raizada, Guerrilla Girls (Group of artists), DAM! : Dyke Action Machine (Organization), Toxic Titties (Group of artists)","doi":"10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1970, in an unsuspecting rural community in central California, Judy Chicago married feminist studies with art-making at Fresno State University, promising future generations of women new, expressive forms of art with activist aims. Since then, activist strategies and aesthetic concerns have metamorphosed as each new generation of feminist artists puts feminist theory into practice. Recently, I had the pleasure of engaging three feminist activist art groups-the Guerrilla Girls, Dyke Action Machine (DAM!), and the Toxic Titties-in a discussion regarding their practices. In this interview, the women addressed their methodologies, the challenges each collective faces today, and the future of feminist activist art practices. For all three groups, a strong visual language, subversive wit, and collective identity serve as key weapons for their interventions into the worlds of art, politics, and the media, exposing domains where gender, racial, and sexual injustice still lurk. Of the three groups, the Guerrilla Girls has the longest history, bursting onto the art scene in the early 1980s. By that time, the headiness of the first wave of the feminist art movement was long gone; feminism was no longer \"in,\" if it ever had been in commercial galleries and museums. Instead, the 1980s were characterized by record-breaking prices for works created by a select group of young, male art stars, effectively marginalizing the conceptual and activist practices that dominated the previous decade. And, despite years of feminist agitation, museums continued to organize large, group exhibitions of contemporary art with virtually no women artists represented. In June 1984, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) opened one such blockbuster exhibition in which only ten percent of the 169 artists chosen were women (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 13). The message was clear: the art world was still a male-dominated arena of culture. MoMA's gross oversight was the impetus for the Guerrilla Girls' most famous campaign on the streets of New York City, where the group surreptitiously plastered the walls, kiosks, and construction fences of SoHo and the East Village with provocative posters that exposed the sexist practices of the art world. In straightforward, bold, block letters, the posters questioned What do these artists have in common? and blatantly listed every prestigious art gallery that showed less than ten percent of women artists' work along with the names of the male artists whom the galleries represented (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 8) (Fig. 1). Over the ensuing two decades, the Guerrilla Girls have continued to unabashedly parry and thrust with the art world, wielding their sassy","PeriodicalId":88071,"journal":{"name":"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association","volume":"19 1","pages":"39 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Interview with the Guerrilla Girls, Dyke Action Machine (DAM!), and the Toxic Titties\",\"authors\":\"K. Raizada, Guerrilla Girls (Group of artists), DAM! : Dyke Action Machine (Organization), Toxic Titties (Group of artists)\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1970, in an unsuspecting rural community in central California, Judy Chicago married feminist studies with art-making at Fresno State University, promising future generations of women new, expressive forms of art with activist aims. Since then, activist strategies and aesthetic concerns have metamorphosed as each new generation of feminist artists puts feminist theory into practice. Recently, I had the pleasure of engaging three feminist activist art groups-the Guerrilla Girls, Dyke Action Machine (DAM!), and the Toxic Titties-in a discussion regarding their practices. In this interview, the women addressed their methodologies, the challenges each collective faces today, and the future of feminist activist art practices. For all three groups, a strong visual language, subversive wit, and collective identity serve as key weapons for their interventions into the worlds of art, politics, and the media, exposing domains where gender, racial, and sexual injustice still lurk. Of the three groups, the Guerrilla Girls has the longest history, bursting onto the art scene in the early 1980s. By that time, the headiness of the first wave of the feminist art movement was long gone; feminism was no longer \\\"in,\\\" if it ever had been in commercial galleries and museums. Instead, the 1980s were characterized by record-breaking prices for works created by a select group of young, male art stars, effectively marginalizing the conceptual and activist practices that dominated the previous decade. And, despite years of feminist agitation, museums continued to organize large, group exhibitions of contemporary art with virtually no women artists represented. In June 1984, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) opened one such blockbuster exhibition in which only ten percent of the 169 artists chosen were women (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 13). The message was clear: the art world was still a male-dominated arena of culture. MoMA's gross oversight was the impetus for the Guerrilla Girls' most famous campaign on the streets of New York City, where the group surreptitiously plastered the walls, kiosks, and construction fences of SoHo and the East Village with provocative posters that exposed the sexist practices of the art world. In straightforward, bold, block letters, the posters questioned What do these artists have in common? and blatantly listed every prestigious art gallery that showed less than ten percent of women artists' work along with the names of the male artists whom the galleries represented (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 8) (Fig. 1). Over the ensuing two decades, the Guerrilla Girls have continued to unabashedly parry and thrust with the art world, wielding their sassy\",\"PeriodicalId\":88071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

1970年,在加州中部一个毫不知情的乡村社区,朱迪·芝加哥(Judy Chicago)在弗雷斯诺州立大学(Fresno State University)将女权主义研究与艺术创作结合起来,向未来几代女性承诺,将以激进主义为目标的新颖、富有表现力的艺术形式。从那时起,随着每一代新女性主义艺术家将女性主义理论付诸实践,活动家的策略和审美关注也发生了变化。最近,我很高兴地与三个女权主义激进艺术团体——游击队女孩、堤坝行动机器(DAM!)和有毒乳头——就他们的做法进行了讨论。在这次采访中,她们谈到了她们的方法,每个集体今天面临的挑战,以及女权主义活动家艺术实践的未来。对于这三个群体来说,强烈的视觉语言、颠覆性的智慧和集体认同是他们介入艺术、政治和媒体世界的关键武器,揭露了性别、种族和性别不公正的领域。在这三个组合中,“游击队女孩”的历史最悠久,于20世纪80年代初闯入艺术舞台。到那时,女权主义艺术运动第一波浪潮的狂热早已远去;女权主义不再“流行”,即使它曾经出现在商业画廊和博物馆里。相反,20世纪80年代的特点是,由一群精选的年轻男性艺术明星创作的作品价格破纪录,有效地边缘化了主导前十年的概念和激进主义实践。而且,尽管女权主义运动持续了多年,但博物馆仍在组织大型的当代艺术群展,几乎没有女性艺术家的代表。1984年6月,现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)举办了一场这样的轰动展览,169名入选艺术家中只有10%是女性(Guerrilla Girls 1995,13)。传达的信息很明确:艺术界仍然是男性主导的文化舞台。MoMA的严重疏忽是游击队女孩在纽约街头最著名的活动的动力,在那里,该组织秘密地在SoHo和东村的墙壁、亭和建筑围栏上贴满了挑衅性的海报,揭露了艺术界的性别歧视行为。这些海报用直白、粗体、大写的字体问:这些艺术家有什么共同之处?并公然列出了每一家展示女性艺术家作品少于10%的著名艺术画廊,以及画廊所代理的男性艺术家的名字(游击女孩1995,8)(图1)。在随后的20年里,游击女孩继续肆无忌惮地与艺术界进行派对和冲击,挥舞着她们的时髦
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Interview with the Guerrilla Girls, Dyke Action Machine (DAM!), and the Toxic Titties
In 1970, in an unsuspecting rural community in central California, Judy Chicago married feminist studies with art-making at Fresno State University, promising future generations of women new, expressive forms of art with activist aims. Since then, activist strategies and aesthetic concerns have metamorphosed as each new generation of feminist artists puts feminist theory into practice. Recently, I had the pleasure of engaging three feminist activist art groups-the Guerrilla Girls, Dyke Action Machine (DAM!), and the Toxic Titties-in a discussion regarding their practices. In this interview, the women addressed their methodologies, the challenges each collective faces today, and the future of feminist activist art practices. For all three groups, a strong visual language, subversive wit, and collective identity serve as key weapons for their interventions into the worlds of art, politics, and the media, exposing domains where gender, racial, and sexual injustice still lurk. Of the three groups, the Guerrilla Girls has the longest history, bursting onto the art scene in the early 1980s. By that time, the headiness of the first wave of the feminist art movement was long gone; feminism was no longer "in," if it ever had been in commercial galleries and museums. Instead, the 1980s were characterized by record-breaking prices for works created by a select group of young, male art stars, effectively marginalizing the conceptual and activist practices that dominated the previous decade. And, despite years of feminist agitation, museums continued to organize large, group exhibitions of contemporary art with virtually no women artists represented. In June 1984, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) opened one such blockbuster exhibition in which only ten percent of the 169 artists chosen were women (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 13). The message was clear: the art world was still a male-dominated arena of culture. MoMA's gross oversight was the impetus for the Guerrilla Girls' most famous campaign on the streets of New York City, where the group surreptitiously plastered the walls, kiosks, and construction fences of SoHo and the East Village with provocative posters that exposed the sexist practices of the art world. In straightforward, bold, block letters, the posters questioned What do these artists have in common? and blatantly listed every prestigious art gallery that showed less than ten percent of women artists' work along with the names of the male artists whom the galleries represented (Guerrilla Girls 1995, 8) (Fig. 1). Over the ensuing two decades, the Guerrilla Girls have continued to unabashedly parry and thrust with the art world, wielding their sassy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
반복적 경력단절에 관한 연구 노동시장 내 지체 및 뇌병변 장애여성의 건강변화 인식과 대처 전략에 관한 연구 주제어 연결망 분석을 활용한 국내 여성리더십 연구 동향 여성창업기업과 남성창업기업의 생존특성 비교연구 산재근로자의 직업복귀 성과와 젠더 특성에 관한 종단 연구
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1