积极,消极还是根本没有?是什么驱使消费者发布(准确的)产品评论?

Wendy W. Moe, David A. Schweidel
{"title":"积极,消极还是根本没有?是什么驱使消费者发布(准确的)产品评论?","authors":"Wendy W. Moe, David A. Schweidel","doi":"10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online consumer reviews are a convenient, valuable pool of information for potential buyers as well as for marketers. But how reliable is this information? A closer look at the motives behind posted product reviews shows that online opinions should indeed be interpreted with care. The study results reveal that the composition of the customer base can exert a substantial influence on the posted online opinion. Due to selection bias and adjustment effects over time, the content posted may not necessarily reflect the customer base’s overall opinion of the product. Individuals were more likely to submit ratings when they were either very satisfied or not satisfied. In addition, consumers were more likely to post an opinion when the ratings already posted were more positive. Highly engaged consumers who frequently post their opinions tend to be more negative than less-engaged individuals. Even though decision-makers can gain valuable insights from the analysis of this pool of information, they should not rely on this source exclusively.","PeriodicalId":30678,"journal":{"name":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"8 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive, Negative or Not at All? What Drives Consumers to Post (Accurate) Product Reviews?\",\"authors\":\"Wendy W. Moe, David A. Schweidel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Online consumer reviews are a convenient, valuable pool of information for potential buyers as well as for marketers. But how reliable is this information? A closer look at the motives behind posted product reviews shows that online opinions should indeed be interpreted with care. The study results reveal that the composition of the customer base can exert a substantial influence on the posted online opinion. Due to selection bias and adjustment effects over time, the content posted may not necessarily reflect the customer base’s overall opinion of the product. Individuals were more likely to submit ratings when they were either very satisfied or not satisfied. In addition, consumers were more likely to post an opinion when the ratings already posted were more positive. Highly engaged consumers who frequently post their opinions tend to be more negative than less-engaged individuals. Even though decision-makers can gain valuable insights from the analysis of this pool of information, they should not rely on this source exclusively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"8 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GfK Marketing Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在线消费者评论对潜在买家和营销人员来说都是一个方便、有价值的信息库。但是这些信息有多可靠呢?仔细研究一下发布的产品评论背后的动机就会发现,网上的意见确实应该谨慎解读。研究结果显示,顾客基础的构成对网上发表的意见有实质性的影响。由于选择偏差和随时间的调整效应,发布的内容不一定反映客户群对产品的总体看法。当个人非常满意或不满意时,他们更有可能提交评分。此外,当已经发布的评价更正面时,消费者更有可能发表意见。经常发表意见的高度投入的消费者往往比不太投入的人更消极。尽管决策者可以从对这些信息库的分析中获得有价值的见解,但他们不应该完全依赖这些信息源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positive, Negative or Not at All? What Drives Consumers to Post (Accurate) Product Reviews?
Abstract Online consumer reviews are a convenient, valuable pool of information for potential buyers as well as for marketers. But how reliable is this information? A closer look at the motives behind posted product reviews shows that online opinions should indeed be interpreted with care. The study results reveal that the composition of the customer base can exert a substantial influence on the posted online opinion. Due to selection bias and adjustment effects over time, the content posted may not necessarily reflect the customer base’s overall opinion of the product. Individuals were more likely to submit ratings when they were either very satisfied or not satisfied. In addition, consumers were more likely to post an opinion when the ratings already posted were more positive. Highly engaged consumers who frequently post their opinions tend to be more negative than less-engaged individuals. Even though decision-makers can gain valuable insights from the analysis of this pool of information, they should not rely on this source exclusively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Recreating Intimacy With Connected Consumers Seeding on Moving Ground: How Understanding Network Instability Can Improve Message Dissemination Business Model Innovation: How to Create Value in a Digital World From Corporate Philanthropy to Creating Shared Value: Big Pharma’s New Business Models in Developing Markets Branding Raw Material to Improve Human Rights: Intel’s Ban on Conflict Minerals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1