{"title":"教牧关怀中的罪恶感处理","authors":"J. Kiss","doi":"10.24193/subbtref.67.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This study starts from the current experiential reality of the family, described by sociologist Peter V. Zima as follows: The family, as a victim of society as an alienating structure, becomes itself an alienating structure, which makes it impossible to establish intimate and supportive relationships between family members and the future of the family. The family therefore fails to fulfil its original role of being a place of embeddedness and a resource for society. It is also hampered by transgressions while hindering the search for fairness towards each other. Pastoral care can help families to recognize the essence of guilt and then seek effective resources of help. The paper, therefore, highlights the fundamental relational nature of human existence and the existential nature of guilt through philosophical, theological, and biblical anthropology (1). It then highlights the importance of the notion of existential guilt in contextual perspectives, therapy, and pastoral care (2). Finally, following a theological interpretation of the concept of guilt, it identifies in four points the areas in which the use of the concept of existential guilt in pastoral care is helpful (3). Keywords: relational existence, multiple belonging, heteronomous existence, coexistence as divine discomfort, existential guilt, indebtedness (debitum), actual indebtedness (culpa), order of being, monologic stance, contextual pastoral care \"","PeriodicalId":36470,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dealing with Guilt in Pastoral Care\",\"authors\":\"J. Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/subbtref.67.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This study starts from the current experiential reality of the family, described by sociologist Peter V. Zima as follows: The family, as a victim of society as an alienating structure, becomes itself an alienating structure, which makes it impossible to establish intimate and supportive relationships between family members and the future of the family. The family therefore fails to fulfil its original role of being a place of embeddedness and a resource for society. It is also hampered by transgressions while hindering the search for fairness towards each other. Pastoral care can help families to recognize the essence of guilt and then seek effective resources of help. The paper, therefore, highlights the fundamental relational nature of human existence and the existential nature of guilt through philosophical, theological, and biblical anthropology (1). It then highlights the importance of the notion of existential guilt in contextual perspectives, therapy, and pastoral care (2). Finally, following a theological interpretation of the concept of guilt, it identifies in four points the areas in which the use of the concept of existential guilt in pastoral care is helpful (3). Keywords: relational existence, multiple belonging, heteronomous existence, coexistence as divine discomfort, existential guilt, indebtedness (debitum), actual indebtedness (culpa), order of being, monologic stance, contextual pastoral care \\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":36470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbtref.67.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbtref.67.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究从目前家庭的经验现实出发,社会学家彼得·齐玛(Peter V. Zima)这样描述:家庭作为社会的受害者,作为一种异化的结构,它本身也成为一种异化的结构,这使得家庭成员和家庭的未来之间不可能建立亲密和支持的关系。因此,家庭未能履行其作为嵌入社会的场所和社会资源的最初作用。它还受到越轨行为的阻碍,同时妨碍寻求彼此之间的公平。教牧关怀可以帮助家庭认识到内疚的本质,进而寻求有效的帮助资源。因此,本文通过哲学、神学和圣经人类学强调了人类存在的基本关系本质和内疚的存在性本质(1)。然后强调了存在性内疚概念在语境视角、治疗和教牧关怀中的重要性(2)。最后,根据对内疚概念的神学解释,它在四个方面确定了在教牧关怀中使用存在主义内疚概念的帮助(3)。关键词:关系存在,多重归属,他律存在,作为神圣不适的共存,存在主义内疚,负债(debitum),实际负债(culpa),存在秩序,单一立场,情境教牧关怀。”
"This study starts from the current experiential reality of the family, described by sociologist Peter V. Zima as follows: The family, as a victim of society as an alienating structure, becomes itself an alienating structure, which makes it impossible to establish intimate and supportive relationships between family members and the future of the family. The family therefore fails to fulfil its original role of being a place of embeddedness and a resource for society. It is also hampered by transgressions while hindering the search for fairness towards each other. Pastoral care can help families to recognize the essence of guilt and then seek effective resources of help. The paper, therefore, highlights the fundamental relational nature of human existence and the existential nature of guilt through philosophical, theological, and biblical anthropology (1). It then highlights the importance of the notion of existential guilt in contextual perspectives, therapy, and pastoral care (2). Finally, following a theological interpretation of the concept of guilt, it identifies in four points the areas in which the use of the concept of existential guilt in pastoral care is helpful (3). Keywords: relational existence, multiple belonging, heteronomous existence, coexistence as divine discomfort, existential guilt, indebtedness (debitum), actual indebtedness (culpa), order of being, monologic stance, contextual pastoral care "