试图衡量巴基斯坦的女性地位及其对生殖行为的影响。

Q4 Social Sciences Pakistan Development Review Pub Date : 1993-01-01 DOI:10.30541/V32I4IIPP.917-930
K. Manzoor
{"title":"试图衡量巴基斯坦的女性地位及其对生殖行为的影响。","authors":"K. Manzoor","doi":"10.30541/V32I4IIPP.917-930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data from the 1991 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey is used to examine the bivariate relationship between female status and fertility, female status and sex preference for the next child, female status and current contraceptive use, and female status and discussion by couples of family planning and family size. Female status is measured by educational level of females, husband's educational level, current work status, each occupation level of spouses, exposure to media, and mobility. High, medium, and low variants are the status groupings. There are 69% in low status, 29% in medium, and 2% in high status groups. 57% of urban and 80% of rural women were low status. 40% of urban and 20% of rural were medium status. 3% urban and 1% rural were high status. Fertility among low status women was 34% with under 4 children, 28% with 4-7 children, and 6% with 8 or more children. 16% of medium status women had under 4 children, 12% had 4-7 children, and 2% had 8 or more children. 1% of high status women had under 4 children, and 1% had 4-7 children. 51% of all women did not want more children. 65% of low status women did not currently use contraception. 5% of medium status women were nonusers; 1% of high status women, 4% of low status women, and 25% of medium status women were users. There was a negative relationship between female status and number of living children. Increased status also was related to declines in the sex preference. The sign was positive for low status women and negative for medium status women. In general, it was suggested that increased female status was related to increased contraceptive use at earlier parity and decreased fertility. There was a negative relationship between female status and frequency of couple discussion about family planning for low and medium status women and a positive one for high status women. The relationship with family size showed the reverse pattern whereby increased status led to discussion of family size among low and medium status couples and not high status couples. The implication was that fertility cannot be explained solely by female status.","PeriodicalId":35921,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Development Review","volume":"32 4 Pt 2 1","pages":"917-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An attempt to measure female status in Pakistan and its impact on reproductive behaviour.\",\"authors\":\"K. Manzoor\",\"doi\":\"10.30541/V32I4IIPP.917-930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data from the 1991 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey is used to examine the bivariate relationship between female status and fertility, female status and sex preference for the next child, female status and current contraceptive use, and female status and discussion by couples of family planning and family size. Female status is measured by educational level of females, husband's educational level, current work status, each occupation level of spouses, exposure to media, and mobility. High, medium, and low variants are the status groupings. There are 69% in low status, 29% in medium, and 2% in high status groups. 57% of urban and 80% of rural women were low status. 40% of urban and 20% of rural were medium status. 3% urban and 1% rural were high status. Fertility among low status women was 34% with under 4 children, 28% with 4-7 children, and 6% with 8 or more children. 16% of medium status women had under 4 children, 12% had 4-7 children, and 2% had 8 or more children. 1% of high status women had under 4 children, and 1% had 4-7 children. 51% of all women did not want more children. 65% of low status women did not currently use contraception. 5% of medium status women were nonusers; 1% of high status women, 4% of low status women, and 25% of medium status women were users. There was a negative relationship between female status and number of living children. Increased status also was related to declines in the sex preference. The sign was positive for low status women and negative for medium status women. In general, it was suggested that increased female status was related to increased contraceptive use at earlier parity and decreased fertility. There was a negative relationship between female status and frequency of couple discussion about family planning for low and medium status women and a positive one for high status women. The relationship with family size showed the reverse pattern whereby increased status led to discussion of family size among low and medium status couples and not high status couples. The implication was that fertility cannot be explained solely by female status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Development Review\",\"volume\":\"32 4 Pt 2 1\",\"pages\":\"917-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30541/V32I4IIPP.917-930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30541/V32I4IIPP.917-930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

1991年巴基斯坦人口与健康调查的数据用于研究女性地位与生育率、女性地位与下一个孩子的性别偏好、女性地位与目前避孕药具的使用、以及女性地位与夫妇对计划生育和家庭规模的讨论之间的双变量关系。女性地位的衡量标准包括女性的受教育程度、丈夫的受教育程度、目前的工作状况、配偶的各职业水平、媒体曝光率和流动性。高、中、低变体是状态分组。地位低的占69%,中等的占29%,地位高的占2%。57%的城市妇女和80%的农村妇女地位低下。40%的城市和20%的农村处于中等地位。3%的城市和1%的农村是高地位。低地位妇女的生育率为34%,生育4个以下子女,28%生育4-7个子女,6%生育8个或更多子女。16%的中等地位妇女有4个以下的孩子,12%有4-7个孩子,2%有8个或更多的孩子。1%的高地位女性有4个以下的孩子,1%有4-7个孩子。51%的女性不想要更多的孩子。65%的低地位妇女目前没有采取避孕措施。5%的中等地位女性不吸毒;1%的高地位女性、4%的低地位女性和25%的中等地位女性是用户。女性地位与活子女数呈负相关。地位的提高也与性别偏好的下降有关。这个信号对地位低的女性是积极的,对地位中等的女性是消极的。一般来说,认为女性地位的提高与较早产次使用避孕药具的增加和生育率的下降有关。女性地位与夫妻讨论计划生育频率之间存在负相关关系,而女性地位与夫妻讨论计划生育频率之间存在正相关关系。与家庭规模的关系显示出相反的模式,即地位的提高导致中等和低地位夫妇讨论家庭规模,而不是高地位夫妇。言下之意是,生育率不能仅仅用女性地位来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An attempt to measure female status in Pakistan and its impact on reproductive behaviour.
Data from the 1991 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey is used to examine the bivariate relationship between female status and fertility, female status and sex preference for the next child, female status and current contraceptive use, and female status and discussion by couples of family planning and family size. Female status is measured by educational level of females, husband's educational level, current work status, each occupation level of spouses, exposure to media, and mobility. High, medium, and low variants are the status groupings. There are 69% in low status, 29% in medium, and 2% in high status groups. 57% of urban and 80% of rural women were low status. 40% of urban and 20% of rural were medium status. 3% urban and 1% rural were high status. Fertility among low status women was 34% with under 4 children, 28% with 4-7 children, and 6% with 8 or more children. 16% of medium status women had under 4 children, 12% had 4-7 children, and 2% had 8 or more children. 1% of high status women had under 4 children, and 1% had 4-7 children. 51% of all women did not want more children. 65% of low status women did not currently use contraception. 5% of medium status women were nonusers; 1% of high status women, 4% of low status women, and 25% of medium status women were users. There was a negative relationship between female status and number of living children. Increased status also was related to declines in the sex preference. The sign was positive for low status women and negative for medium status women. In general, it was suggested that increased female status was related to increased contraceptive use at earlier parity and decreased fertility. There was a negative relationship between female status and frequency of couple discussion about family planning for low and medium status women and a positive one for high status women. The relationship with family size showed the reverse pattern whereby increased status led to discussion of family size among low and medium status couples and not high status couples. The implication was that fertility cannot be explained solely by female status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Development Review
Pakistan Development Review Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to encourage original scholarly contributions that focus on a broad spectrum of development issues using empirical and theoretical approaches to scientific enquiry. With a view to generating scholarly debate on public policy issues, the journal particularly encourages scientific contributions that explore policy relevant issues pertaining to developing economies in general and Pakistan’s economy in particular.
期刊最新文献
Correlates of child mortality in Pakistan: a hazards model analysis. Correlates of child mortality in Pakistan: a hazards model analysis. Reintegration of Pakistani return migrants from the Middle East in the domestic labour market. Reproductive goals and family planning attitudes in Pakistan: a couple-level analysis. Reproductive goals and family planning attitudes in Pakistan: a couple-level analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1