2017年密苏里州地表水质量

Q4 Environmental Science U.S. Geological Survey Data Series Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.3133/DS1108
Miya N. Barr, Katherine A. Bartels
{"title":"2017年密苏里州地表水质量","authors":"Miya N. Barr, Katherine A. Bartels","doi":"10.3133/DS1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, designed and operates a network of monitoring stations on streams and springs throughout Missouri known as the Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. During water year 2017 (October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017), data presented in this report were collected at 72 stations: 70 Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network stations and 2 U.S. Geological Survey National Stream Quality Assessment Network stations. Among the 72 stations in this report, 4 stations have data presented from additional sampling performed in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Summaries of the concentrations of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, water temperature, suspended solids, suspended sediment, Escherichia coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved and total recoverable lead and zinc, and selected pesticide compounds are presented. Most of the stations have been classified based on the physiographic province or primary land use in the watershed represented by the station. Some stations have been classified based on the unique hydrology of the waterbodies they monitor. A summary of hydrologic conditions in the State including peak streamflows, monthly mean streamflows, and 7-day low flows also are presented. Introduction The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) is responsible for the implementation of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.) in Missouri. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that each State develop a water-quality monitoring program and periodically report the status of its water quality (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997). Water-quality status is described in terms of the suitability of the water for various uses, such as drinking, fishing, swimming, and supporting aquatic life; these uses formally were defined as “designated uses” in State and Federal regulations. Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires States to identify impaired waters and determine the total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) of pollutants that can be present in these waters and still meet applicable water-quality standards for their designated uses (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2018). A TMDL addresses a single pollutant for each waterbody. Missouri has an area of about 69,000 square miles and an estimated population of 6.09 million people (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). Within Missouri, 115,772 miles (mi) of classified streams support a variety of uses including wildlife, recreation, agriculture, industry, transportation, and public utilities, but only 24,761 mi (or about 21 percent) were monitored, evaluated, and assessed in the State’s most recent waterquality report (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). Of these assessed stream miles, an estimated 5,307 mi fully support the designated uses, and an estimated 5,549 mi are impaired by various physical changes or chemical contaminants to the point that criteria for at least one of the designated uses no longer can be met (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). The purpose of this report is to summarize surface-water quality data collected for the MDNR–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) cooperative Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network (AWQMN) for water year 2017. The annual summary of select constituents provides MDNR with current information to assess the quality of surface water within the State and ensure the objectives of the AWQMN are being met. This report is one in a series of annual summaries (Otero-Benitez and Davis, 2009a, 2009b; Barr, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015; Barr and Schneider, 2014; Barr and Heimann, 2016; Barr and Bartels, 2018). Data on the physical characteristics and waterquality constituents in samples collected during the 2017 water year are presented in figures and tables for 72 surface-water stations located throughout the State. The Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network The USGS, in cooperation with the MDNR, collects surface-water quality data pertaining to water resources in Missouri each water year (October 1 through September 30). These data, stored and maintained in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017), are collected as part of the Missouri AWQMN. The data collected for the AQWMN constitute a permanent source of accessible, accurate, impartial, and timely information for 2 Quality of Surface Water in Missouri, Water Year 2017 developing an enhanced understanding of the State’s water resources. Historical surface-water quality data were published annually in the Water-Data Report series from water years 1964 through 2005 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1964–2005). Published data for the 2006 through 2010 water years can be accessed at https://wdr.water.usgs.gov/ (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006b–2010). Beginning in water year 2011, discrete water-quality data were no longer published annually but can be accessed in the NWIS database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017). The objectives of the AWQMN are to (1) obtain data on the quality and quantity of surface water within the State; (2) provide a database of historical water-quality information that can be used by the State planning and management agencies to make informed decisions about anthropogenic effects (such as agriculture, mining, and urban) on the State’s surface waters; and (3) provide for consistent methodology in data collection, laboratory analysis, and data reporting. Constituent concentration data from the AWQMN have been used to determine statewide water-quality status and long-term trends (Barr and Davis, 2010) to meet information needs of State agencies involved in water-quality planning and management. The data collected also provide support for the design, implementation, and evaluation of preventive and remediation programs. The MDNR and the USGS established a fixed-station AWQMN in 1964 with 18 stations, 5 of which are being sampled currently (2018). The number of stations within the AWQMN has varied since its inception because of changes in the State’s needs. During water year 2017, the AWQMN program consisted of 70 stations (69 primary stations and 1 alternate station). Alternate sampling stations have been established at streamflow-gaging stations near some primary AWQMN stations, and one such station, Drywood Creek near Deerfield, Missouri (06917680), was sampled in September 2017 because of dry conditions at East Drywood Creek at Prairie State Park, Mo. (06917630). Sampling frequency at each station is determined by several factors, including drainage basin size, potential effects from anthropogenic activities (such as agriculture, mining, and urban), history of chemical change, need for annual data, and cost. Each of the streams in the AWQMN is classified for one or more designated uses. For specific information on the designated uses applicable to the streams sampled in the AWQMN, refer to Missouri Department of Natural Resources (2016a; 2016b). The unique eight-digit number used by the USGS to identify each surface-water station is assigned when a station is first established. The complete eight-digit number for each station includes a two-digit prefix that designates the primary river system (05 is the upper Mississippi River, 06 is the Missouri River, and 07 is the lower Mississippi River) plus a six-digit downstream-order number; for example, the station number 05587455 indicates the station is in the upper Mississippi River system (05), and the remaining six digits (587455) locate the station in downstream order. In this system, the station numbers increase downstream along the main stem. A station on a tributary that enters between two main stem stations is assigned a station number between them. Constituents collected within the AWQMN have been established by the MDNR based on their data needs at each station. Samples were collected by USGS personnel; collection methods and techniques followed USGS protocol (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006a). Onsite measurements of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, and water temperature were collected at each station according to procedures described in Wilde (variously dated). Water samples were collected and processed for fecal indicator bacteria [Escherichia coli (E. coli) and fecal coliform] densities using the membrane filtration procedure described in Myers and others (2014). Methods used by the USGS for collecting and processing representative samples for nutrients, primary chemical constituents, trace elements, suspended solids, suspended sediment, and pesticide analyses are presented in detail in U.S. Geological Survey (2006a), Guy (1969), Wilde and others (2004), and Sandstrom and Wilde (2014). All laboratory analyses were done by the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) in Lakewood, Colorado, according to procedures described in Garbarino and others (2006), Fishman (1993), Patton and Kryskalla (2011), Patton and Truitt (1992), Sandstrom and others (2001 and 2015), and Zaugg and others (1995). Suspended-sediment concentrations were computed according to procedures described in Guy (1969). In addition to the surface-water quality data collected from the 70 stations that form the AWQMN, selected data collected as part of other cooperative efforts are included in this report to help summarize water-quality conditions across the State. Water samples also are collected by the USGS at two USGS National Stream Quality Assessment Network (NASQAN; a national water-quality sampling network operated by the USGS, see https://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/ home) stations. Sediment samples collected at four USGS streamflow-gaging stations are presented in this report. These samples are collected as part of a larger monitoring effort in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The suspended-sediment concentration data in this report ar","PeriodicalId":52356,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Geological Survey Data Series","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of surface water in Missouri, water year 2017\",\"authors\":\"Miya N. Barr, Katherine A. Bartels\",\"doi\":\"10.3133/DS1108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, designed and operates a network of monitoring stations on streams and springs throughout Missouri known as the Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. During water year 2017 (October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017), data presented in this report were collected at 72 stations: 70 Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network stations and 2 U.S. Geological Survey National Stream Quality Assessment Network stations. Among the 72 stations in this report, 4 stations have data presented from additional sampling performed in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Summaries of the concentrations of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, water temperature, suspended solids, suspended sediment, Escherichia coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved and total recoverable lead and zinc, and selected pesticide compounds are presented. Most of the stations have been classified based on the physiographic province or primary land use in the watershed represented by the station. Some stations have been classified based on the unique hydrology of the waterbodies they monitor. A summary of hydrologic conditions in the State including peak streamflows, monthly mean streamflows, and 7-day low flows also are presented. Introduction The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) is responsible for the implementation of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.) in Missouri. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that each State develop a water-quality monitoring program and periodically report the status of its water quality (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997). Water-quality status is described in terms of the suitability of the water for various uses, such as drinking, fishing, swimming, and supporting aquatic life; these uses formally were defined as “designated uses” in State and Federal regulations. Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires States to identify impaired waters and determine the total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) of pollutants that can be present in these waters and still meet applicable water-quality standards for their designated uses (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2018). A TMDL addresses a single pollutant for each waterbody. Missouri has an area of about 69,000 square miles and an estimated population of 6.09 million people (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). Within Missouri, 115,772 miles (mi) of classified streams support a variety of uses including wildlife, recreation, agriculture, industry, transportation, and public utilities, but only 24,761 mi (or about 21 percent) were monitored, evaluated, and assessed in the State’s most recent waterquality report (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). Of these assessed stream miles, an estimated 5,307 mi fully support the designated uses, and an estimated 5,549 mi are impaired by various physical changes or chemical contaminants to the point that criteria for at least one of the designated uses no longer can be met (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). The purpose of this report is to summarize surface-water quality data collected for the MDNR–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) cooperative Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network (AWQMN) for water year 2017. The annual summary of select constituents provides MDNR with current information to assess the quality of surface water within the State and ensure the objectives of the AWQMN are being met. This report is one in a series of annual summaries (Otero-Benitez and Davis, 2009a, 2009b; Barr, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015; Barr and Schneider, 2014; Barr and Heimann, 2016; Barr and Bartels, 2018). Data on the physical characteristics and waterquality constituents in samples collected during the 2017 water year are presented in figures and tables for 72 surface-water stations located throughout the State. The Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network The USGS, in cooperation with the MDNR, collects surface-water quality data pertaining to water resources in Missouri each water year (October 1 through September 30). These data, stored and maintained in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017), are collected as part of the Missouri AWQMN. The data collected for the AQWMN constitute a permanent source of accessible, accurate, impartial, and timely information for 2 Quality of Surface Water in Missouri, Water Year 2017 developing an enhanced understanding of the State’s water resources. Historical surface-water quality data were published annually in the Water-Data Report series from water years 1964 through 2005 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1964–2005). Published data for the 2006 through 2010 water years can be accessed at https://wdr.water.usgs.gov/ (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006b–2010). Beginning in water year 2011, discrete water-quality data were no longer published annually but can be accessed in the NWIS database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017). The objectives of the AWQMN are to (1) obtain data on the quality and quantity of surface water within the State; (2) provide a database of historical water-quality information that can be used by the State planning and management agencies to make informed decisions about anthropogenic effects (such as agriculture, mining, and urban) on the State’s surface waters; and (3) provide for consistent methodology in data collection, laboratory analysis, and data reporting. Constituent concentration data from the AWQMN have been used to determine statewide water-quality status and long-term trends (Barr and Davis, 2010) to meet information needs of State agencies involved in water-quality planning and management. The data collected also provide support for the design, implementation, and evaluation of preventive and remediation programs. The MDNR and the USGS established a fixed-station AWQMN in 1964 with 18 stations, 5 of which are being sampled currently (2018). The number of stations within the AWQMN has varied since its inception because of changes in the State’s needs. During water year 2017, the AWQMN program consisted of 70 stations (69 primary stations and 1 alternate station). Alternate sampling stations have been established at streamflow-gaging stations near some primary AWQMN stations, and one such station, Drywood Creek near Deerfield, Missouri (06917680), was sampled in September 2017 because of dry conditions at East Drywood Creek at Prairie State Park, Mo. (06917630). Sampling frequency at each station is determined by several factors, including drainage basin size, potential effects from anthropogenic activities (such as agriculture, mining, and urban), history of chemical change, need for annual data, and cost. Each of the streams in the AWQMN is classified for one or more designated uses. For specific information on the designated uses applicable to the streams sampled in the AWQMN, refer to Missouri Department of Natural Resources (2016a; 2016b). The unique eight-digit number used by the USGS to identify each surface-water station is assigned when a station is first established. The complete eight-digit number for each station includes a two-digit prefix that designates the primary river system (05 is the upper Mississippi River, 06 is the Missouri River, and 07 is the lower Mississippi River) plus a six-digit downstream-order number; for example, the station number 05587455 indicates the station is in the upper Mississippi River system (05), and the remaining six digits (587455) locate the station in downstream order. In this system, the station numbers increase downstream along the main stem. A station on a tributary that enters between two main stem stations is assigned a station number between them. Constituents collected within the AWQMN have been established by the MDNR based on their data needs at each station. Samples were collected by USGS personnel; collection methods and techniques followed USGS protocol (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006a). Onsite measurements of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, and water temperature were collected at each station according to procedures described in Wilde (variously dated). Water samples were collected and processed for fecal indicator bacteria [Escherichia coli (E. coli) and fecal coliform] densities using the membrane filtration procedure described in Myers and others (2014). Methods used by the USGS for collecting and processing representative samples for nutrients, primary chemical constituents, trace elements, suspended solids, suspended sediment, and pesticide analyses are presented in detail in U.S. Geological Survey (2006a), Guy (1969), Wilde and others (2004), and Sandstrom and Wilde (2014). All laboratory analyses were done by the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) in Lakewood, Colorado, according to procedures described in Garbarino and others (2006), Fishman (1993), Patton and Kryskalla (2011), Patton and Truitt (1992), Sandstrom and others (2001 and 2015), and Zaugg and others (1995). Suspended-sediment concentrations were computed according to procedures described in Guy (1969). In addition to the surface-water quality data collected from the 70 stations that form the AWQMN, selected data collected as part of other cooperative efforts are included in this report to help summarize water-quality conditions across the State. Water samples also are collected by the USGS at two USGS National Stream Quality Assessment Network (NASQAN; a national water-quality sampling network operated by the USGS, see https://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/ home) stations. Sediment samples collected at four USGS streamflow-gaging stations are presented in this report. These samples are collected as part of a larger monitoring effort in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The suspended-sediment concentration data in this report ar\",\"PeriodicalId\":52356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"U.S. Geological Survey Data Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"U.S. Geological Survey Data Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3133/DS1108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Geological Survey Data Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/DS1108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国地质调查局与密苏里州自然资源部合作,设计并运行了一个遍布密苏里州的河流和泉水监测站网络,即环境水质监测网。在2017年水年(2016年10月1日至2017年9月30日)期间,本报告中提供的数据收集于72个站点:70个环境水质监测网络站点和2个美国地质调查局国家溪流质量评估网络站点。在本报告的72个站点中,有4个站点的数据来自与美国陆军工程兵团合作进行的额外抽样。概述了溶解氧、比电导、水温、悬浮物、悬浮物、大肠杆菌、粪便大肠菌群、溶态硝酸盐加亚硝酸盐氮、总磷、溶态铅和总可回收锌以及选定农药化合物的浓度。大多数台站的分类是基于地理省份或台站所代表的流域的主要土地利用。有些监测站根据其监测的水体的独特水文特征进行分类。此外,还介绍了该州的水文条件,包括峰值流量、月平均流量和7天低流量。密苏里州自然资源部(mddr)负责在密苏里州实施《联邦清洁水法》(33 U.S.C.§1251 et seq.)。《清洁水法》第305(b)条要求各州制定水质监测计划并定期报告其水质状况(美国环境保护署,1997年)。水质状况是根据水是否适合各种用途来描述的,例如饮用、捕鱼、游泳和支持水生生物;这些用途在州和联邦法规中被正式定义为“指定用途”。《清洁水法》第303(d)条要求各州确定受损水域,并确定这些水域中可能存在的污染物的总最大日负荷(tmdl),但仍符合其指定用途的适用水质标准(美国环境保护署,2018)。TMDL针对每个水体的一种污染物。密苏里州面积约69000平方英里,人口约609万(美国人口普查局,2016年)。在密苏里州,115,772英里(英里)的分类溪流支持各种用途,包括野生动物,娱乐,农业,工业,运输和公用事业,但在该州最新的水质报告中,只有24,761英里(约21%)进行了监测,评估和评估(密苏里州自然资源部,2016a)。在这些评估的河流里程中,估计有5307英里完全支持指定用途,估计有5549英里受到各种物理变化或化学污染物的损害,达到至少一种指定用途的标准不再能够满足(密苏里州自然资源部,2016a)。本报告的目的是总结为mdnr - us收集的地表水质量数据。美国地质调查局(USGS) 2017水年环境水质监测合作网络(AWQMN)。精选组成部分的年度摘要为MDNR提供了评估州内地表水质量的最新信息,并确保实现了AWQMN的目标。本报告是一系列年度总结之一(Otero-Benitez and Davis, 2009a, 2009b;巴尔,2010年,2011年,2013年,2014年,2015年;Barr and Schneider, 2014;Barr and Heimann, 2016;Barr and Bartels, 2018)。2017年水年期间收集的样品的物理特征和水质成分数据以图表和表格的形式呈现,这些数据来自全州72个地表水站。环境水质监测网美国地质勘探局与mdrr合作,在每个水年(10月1日至9月30日)收集密苏里州水资源的地表水质量数据。这些数据存储和维护在美国地质调查局国家水信息系统(NWIS)数据库中(美国地质调查局,2017年),作为密苏里州AWQMN的一部分收集。为AQWMN收集的数据构成了可访问、准确、公正和及时的2密苏里州地表水质量信息的永久来源,2017年水年加深了对该州水资源的了解。从1964年到2005年,地表水水质的历史数据每年都会在《水数据报告》系列中公布(美国地质调查局,1964 - 2005)。2006年至2010年水年的公布数据可在https://wdr.water.usgs.gov/上访问(美国地质调查局,2006b-2010)。 美国地质调查局与密苏里州自然资源部合作,设计并运行了一个遍布密苏里州的河流和泉水监测站网络,即环境水质监测网。在2017年水年(2016年10月1日至2017年9月30日)期间,本报告中提供的数据收集于72个站点:70个环境水质监测网络站点和2个美国地质调查局国家溪流质量评估网络站点。在本报告的72个站点中,有4个站点的数据来自与美国陆军工程兵团合作进行的额外抽样。概述了溶解氧、比电导、水温、悬浮物、悬浮物、大肠杆菌、粪便大肠菌群、溶态硝酸盐加亚硝酸盐氮、总磷、溶态铅和总可回收锌以及选定农药化合物的浓度。大多数台站的分类是基于地理省份或台站所代表的流域的主要土地利用。有些监测站根据其监测的水体的独特水文特征进行分类。此外,还介绍了该州的水文条件,包括峰值流量、月平均流量和7天低流量。密苏里州自然资源部(mddr)负责在密苏里州实施《联邦清洁水法》(33 U.S.C.§1251 et seq.)。《清洁水法》第305(b)条要求各州制定水质监测计划并定期报告其水质状况(美国环境保护署,1997年)。水质状况是根据水是否适合各种用途来描述的,例如饮用、捕鱼、游泳和支持水生生物;这些用途在州和联邦法规中被正式定义为“指定用途”。《清洁水法》第303(d)条要求各州确定受损水域,并确定这些水域中可能存在的污染物的总最大日负荷(tmdl),但仍符合其指定用途的适用水质标准(美国环境保护署,2018)。TMDL针对每个水体的一种污染物。密苏里州面积约69000平方英里,人口约609万(美国人口普查局,2016年)。在密苏里州,115,772英里(英里)的分类溪流支持各种用途,包括野生动物,娱乐,农业,工业,运输和公用事业,但在该州最新的水质报告中,只有24,761英里(约21%)进行了监测,评估和评估(密苏里州自然资源部,2016a)。在这些评估的河流里程中,估计有5307英里完全支持指定用途,估计有5549英里受到各种物理变化或化学污染物的损害,达到至少一种指定用途的标准不再能够满足(密苏里州自然资源部,2016a)。本报告的目的是总结为mdnr - us收集的地表水质量数据。美国地质调查局(USGS) 2017水年环境水质监测合作网络(AWQMN)。精选组成部分的年度摘要为MDNR提供了评估州内地表水质量的最新信息,并确保实现了AWQMN的目标。本报告是一系列年度总结之一(Otero-Benitez and Davis, 2009a, 2009b;巴尔,2010年,2011年,2013年,2014年,2015年;Barr and Schneider, 2014;Barr and Heimann, 2016;Barr and Bartels, 2018)。2017年水年期间收集的样品的物理特征和水质成分数据以图表和表格的形式呈现,这些数据来自全州72个地表水站。环境水质监测网美国地质勘探局与mdrr合作,在每个水年(10月1日至9月30日)收集密苏里州水资源的地表水质量数据。这些数据存储和维护在美国地质调查局国家水信息系统(NWIS)数据库中(美国地质调查局,2017年),作为密苏里州AWQMN的一部分收集。为AQWMN收集的数据构成了可访问、准确、公正和及时的2密苏里州地表水质量信息的永久来源,2017年水年加深了对该州水资源的了解。从1964年到2005年,地表水水质的历史数据每年都会在《水数据报告》系列中公布(美国地质调查局,1964 - 2005)。2006年至2010年水年的公布数据可在https://wdr.water.usgs.gov/上访问(美国地质调查局,2006b-2010)。 从2011年水年开始,离散的水质数据不再每年发布,但可以在NWIS数据库中访问(美国地质调查局,2017)。AWQMN的目标是:(1)获取该州地表水质量和数量的数据;(2)提供历史水质信息数据库,供国家规划和管理机构使用,以便就人为影响(如农业、矿业和城市)对国家地表水的影响做出明智的决策;(3)在数据收集、实验室分析和数据报告中提供一致的方法。AWQMN的成分浓度数据被用来确定全州的水质状况和长期趋势(Barr和Davis, 2010),以满足参与水质规划和管理的州机构的信息需求。收集的数据还为预防和补救方案的设计、实施和评估提供支持。mdrr和USGS于1964年建立了固定站AWQMN,共有18个站点,目前(2018年)正在对其中5个站点进行采样。由于国家需要的变化,AWQMN内的电台数量自成立以来一直有所变化。在2017水年,AWQMN项目由70个站点组成(69个主站和1个备用站点)。在一些主要AWQMN站附近的流量测量站建立了备用采样站,其中一个这样的站点,密苏里州迪尔菲尔德附近的Drywood Creek(06917680),由于密苏里州草原州立公园East Drywood Creek(06917630)的干燥条件,于2017年9月采样。每个站点的采样频率由几个因素决定,包括流域大小、人为活动(如农业、采矿和城市)的潜在影响、化学变化的历史、对年度数据的需求和成本。AWQMN中的每个流都被分类为一个或多个指定用途。有关适用于AWQMN中采样溪流的指定用途的具体信息,请参阅密苏里州自然资源部(2016a;2016 b)。美国地质勘探局用来识别每个地表水站的唯一八位数字是在第一次建立站时分配的。每个站点完整的八位数号码包括一个两位数字的前缀,用来指定主要的河流系统(05是密西西比河上游,06是密苏里河,07是密西西比河下游)加上一个六位数字的下游顺序号码;例如,站点号05587455表示该站点位于密西西比河上游系统(05),其余六位数字(587455)表示该站点位于下游顺序。在这个系统中,站数沿着主系统下游增加。支流上进入两个主干流站之间的站被分配一个站号。在AWQMN中收集的成分是由MDNR根据每个站点的数据需求建立的。样本由美国地质勘探局人员采集;收集方法和技术遵循美国地质调查局的规程(美国地质调查局,2006a)。现场测量溶解氧,比电导,和水温收集在每个站根据程序描述的王尔德(各种日期)。使用Myers等人(2014)描述的膜过滤程序收集水样并处理粪便指示细菌[大肠杆菌(E. coli)和粪便大肠菌]密度。美国地质调查局用于收集和处理营养物质、主要化学成分、微量元素、悬浮固体、悬浮沉积物和农药分析的代表性样品的方法,在美国地质调查局(2006a)、Guy(1969)、Wilde等(2004)和Sandstrom和Wilde(2014)中有详细介绍。根据Garbarino等人(2006年)、Fishman(1993年)、Patton和Kryskalla(2011年)、Patton和Truitt(1992年)、Sandstrom等人(2001年和2015年)以及Zaugg等人(1995年)所描述的程序,所有实验室分析均由科罗拉多州Lakewood的美国地质调查局国家水质实验室(NWQL)完成。根据Guy(1969)中描述的程序计算悬浮沉积物浓度。除了从组成AWQMN的70个站点收集的地表水质量数据外,本报告还包括作为其他合作努力的一部分收集的精选数据,以帮助总结全州的水质状况。水样也由美国地质勘探局在两个美国地质勘探局国家溪流质量评估网络(NASQAN;一个由美国地质勘探局运营的国家水质采样网络,参见https://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/ home)站。本报告介绍了在美国地质勘探局四个流量测量站收集的沉积物样本。这些样本是与美国合作开展的更大规模监测工作的一部分 从2011年水年开始,离散的水质数据不再每年发布,但可以在NWIS数据库中访问(美国地质调查局,2017)。AWQMN的目标是:(1)获取该州地表水质量和数量的数据;(2)提供历史水质信息数据库,供国家规划和管理机构使用,以便就人为影响(如农业、矿业和城市)对国家地表水的影响做出明智的决策;(3)在数据收集、实验室分析和数据报告中提供一致的方法。AWQMN的成分浓度数据被用来确定全州的水质状况和长期趋势(Barr和Davis, 2010),以满足参与水质规划和管理的州机构的信息需求。收集的数据还为预防和补救方案的设计、实施和评估提供支持。mdrr和USGS于1964年建立了固定站AWQMN,共有18个站点,目前(2018年)正在对其中5个站点进行采样。由于国家需要的变化,AWQMN内的电台数量自成立以来一直有所变化。在2017水年,AWQMN项目由70个站点组成(69个主站和1个备用站点)。在一些主要AWQMN站附近的流量测量站建立了备用采样站,其中一个这样的站点,密苏里州迪尔菲尔德附近的Drywood Creek(06917680),由于密苏里州草原州立公园East Drywood Creek(06917630)的干燥条件,于2017年9月采样。每个站点的采样频率由几个因素决定,包括流域大小、人为活动(如农业、采矿和城市)的潜在影响、化学变化的历史、对年度数据的需求和成本。AWQMN中的每个流都被分类为一个或多个指定用途。有关适用于AWQMN中采样溪流的指定用途的具体信息,请参阅密苏里州自然资源部(2016a;2016 b)。美国地质勘探局用来识别每个地表水站的唯一八位数字是在第一次建立站时分配的。每个站点完整的八位数号码包括一个两位数字的前缀,用来指定主要的河流系统(05是密西西比河上游,06是密苏里河,07是密西西比河下游)加上一个六位数字的下游顺序号码;例如,站点号05587455表示该站点位于密西西比河上游系统(05),其余六位数字(587455)表示该站点位于下游顺序。在这个系统中,站数沿着主系统下游增加。支流上进入两个主干流站之间的站被分配一个站号。在AWQMN中收集的成分是由MDNR根据每个站点的数据需求建立的。样本由美国地质勘探局人员采集;收集方法和技术遵循美国地质调查局的规程(美国地质调查局,2006a)。现场测量溶解氧,比电导,和水温收集在每个站根据程序描述的王尔德(各种日期)。使用Myers等人(2014)描述的膜过滤程序收集水样并处理粪便指示细菌[大肠杆菌(E. coli)和粪便大肠菌]密度。美国地质调查局用于收集和处理营养物质、主要化学成分、微量元素、悬浮固体、悬浮沉积物和农药分析的代表性样品的方法,在美国地质调查局(2006a)、Guy(1969)、Wilde等(2004)和Sandstrom和Wilde(2014)中有详细介绍。根据Garbarino等人(2006年)、Fishman(1993年)、Patton和Kryskalla(2011年)、Patton和Truitt(1992年)、Sandstrom等人(2001年和2015年)以及Zaugg等人(1995年)所描述的程序,所有实验室分析均由科罗拉多州Lakewood的美国地质调查局国家水质实验室(NWQL)完成。根据Guy(1969)中描述的程序计算悬浮沉积物浓度。除了从组成AWQMN的70个站点收集的地表水质量数据外,本报告还包括作为其他合作努力的一部分收集的精选数据,以帮助总结全州的水质状况。水样也由美国地质勘探局在两个美国地质勘探局国家溪流质量评估网络(NASQAN;一个由美国地质勘探局运营的国家水质采样网络,参见https://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/ home)站。本报告介绍了在美国地质勘探局四个流量测量站收集的沉积物样本。这些样本是与美国合作开展的更大规模监测工作的一部分 陆军工程兵团。本报告中的悬浮泥沙浓度数据为 陆军工程兵团。本报告中的悬浮泥沙浓度数据为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of surface water in Missouri, water year 2017
The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, designed and operates a network of monitoring stations on streams and springs throughout Missouri known as the Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. During water year 2017 (October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017), data presented in this report were collected at 72 stations: 70 Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network stations and 2 U.S. Geological Survey National Stream Quality Assessment Network stations. Among the 72 stations in this report, 4 stations have data presented from additional sampling performed in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Summaries of the concentrations of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, water temperature, suspended solids, suspended sediment, Escherichia coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved and total recoverable lead and zinc, and selected pesticide compounds are presented. Most of the stations have been classified based on the physiographic province or primary land use in the watershed represented by the station. Some stations have been classified based on the unique hydrology of the waterbodies they monitor. A summary of hydrologic conditions in the State including peak streamflows, monthly mean streamflows, and 7-day low flows also are presented. Introduction The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) is responsible for the implementation of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.) in Missouri. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that each State develop a water-quality monitoring program and periodically report the status of its water quality (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997). Water-quality status is described in terms of the suitability of the water for various uses, such as drinking, fishing, swimming, and supporting aquatic life; these uses formally were defined as “designated uses” in State and Federal regulations. Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires States to identify impaired waters and determine the total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) of pollutants that can be present in these waters and still meet applicable water-quality standards for their designated uses (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2018). A TMDL addresses a single pollutant for each waterbody. Missouri has an area of about 69,000 square miles and an estimated population of 6.09 million people (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). Within Missouri, 115,772 miles (mi) of classified streams support a variety of uses including wildlife, recreation, agriculture, industry, transportation, and public utilities, but only 24,761 mi (or about 21 percent) were monitored, evaluated, and assessed in the State’s most recent waterquality report (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). Of these assessed stream miles, an estimated 5,307 mi fully support the designated uses, and an estimated 5,549 mi are impaired by various physical changes or chemical contaminants to the point that criteria for at least one of the designated uses no longer can be met (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 2016a). The purpose of this report is to summarize surface-water quality data collected for the MDNR–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) cooperative Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network (AWQMN) for water year 2017. The annual summary of select constituents provides MDNR with current information to assess the quality of surface water within the State and ensure the objectives of the AWQMN are being met. This report is one in a series of annual summaries (Otero-Benitez and Davis, 2009a, 2009b; Barr, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015; Barr and Schneider, 2014; Barr and Heimann, 2016; Barr and Bartels, 2018). Data on the physical characteristics and waterquality constituents in samples collected during the 2017 water year are presented in figures and tables for 72 surface-water stations located throughout the State. The Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network The USGS, in cooperation with the MDNR, collects surface-water quality data pertaining to water resources in Missouri each water year (October 1 through September 30). These data, stored and maintained in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017), are collected as part of the Missouri AWQMN. The data collected for the AQWMN constitute a permanent source of accessible, accurate, impartial, and timely information for 2 Quality of Surface Water in Missouri, Water Year 2017 developing an enhanced understanding of the State’s water resources. Historical surface-water quality data were published annually in the Water-Data Report series from water years 1964 through 2005 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1964–2005). Published data for the 2006 through 2010 water years can be accessed at https://wdr.water.usgs.gov/ (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006b–2010). Beginning in water year 2011, discrete water-quality data were no longer published annually but can be accessed in the NWIS database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017). The objectives of the AWQMN are to (1) obtain data on the quality and quantity of surface water within the State; (2) provide a database of historical water-quality information that can be used by the State planning and management agencies to make informed decisions about anthropogenic effects (such as agriculture, mining, and urban) on the State’s surface waters; and (3) provide for consistent methodology in data collection, laboratory analysis, and data reporting. Constituent concentration data from the AWQMN have been used to determine statewide water-quality status and long-term trends (Barr and Davis, 2010) to meet information needs of State agencies involved in water-quality planning and management. The data collected also provide support for the design, implementation, and evaluation of preventive and remediation programs. The MDNR and the USGS established a fixed-station AWQMN in 1964 with 18 stations, 5 of which are being sampled currently (2018). The number of stations within the AWQMN has varied since its inception because of changes in the State’s needs. During water year 2017, the AWQMN program consisted of 70 stations (69 primary stations and 1 alternate station). Alternate sampling stations have been established at streamflow-gaging stations near some primary AWQMN stations, and one such station, Drywood Creek near Deerfield, Missouri (06917680), was sampled in September 2017 because of dry conditions at East Drywood Creek at Prairie State Park, Mo. (06917630). Sampling frequency at each station is determined by several factors, including drainage basin size, potential effects from anthropogenic activities (such as agriculture, mining, and urban), history of chemical change, need for annual data, and cost. Each of the streams in the AWQMN is classified for one or more designated uses. For specific information on the designated uses applicable to the streams sampled in the AWQMN, refer to Missouri Department of Natural Resources (2016a; 2016b). The unique eight-digit number used by the USGS to identify each surface-water station is assigned when a station is first established. The complete eight-digit number for each station includes a two-digit prefix that designates the primary river system (05 is the upper Mississippi River, 06 is the Missouri River, and 07 is the lower Mississippi River) plus a six-digit downstream-order number; for example, the station number 05587455 indicates the station is in the upper Mississippi River system (05), and the remaining six digits (587455) locate the station in downstream order. In this system, the station numbers increase downstream along the main stem. A station on a tributary that enters between two main stem stations is assigned a station number between them. Constituents collected within the AWQMN have been established by the MDNR based on their data needs at each station. Samples were collected by USGS personnel; collection methods and techniques followed USGS protocol (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006a). Onsite measurements of dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, and water temperature were collected at each station according to procedures described in Wilde (variously dated). Water samples were collected and processed for fecal indicator bacteria [Escherichia coli (E. coli) and fecal coliform] densities using the membrane filtration procedure described in Myers and others (2014). Methods used by the USGS for collecting and processing representative samples for nutrients, primary chemical constituents, trace elements, suspended solids, suspended sediment, and pesticide analyses are presented in detail in U.S. Geological Survey (2006a), Guy (1969), Wilde and others (2004), and Sandstrom and Wilde (2014). All laboratory analyses were done by the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) in Lakewood, Colorado, according to procedures described in Garbarino and others (2006), Fishman (1993), Patton and Kryskalla (2011), Patton and Truitt (1992), Sandstrom and others (2001 and 2015), and Zaugg and others (1995). Suspended-sediment concentrations were computed according to procedures described in Guy (1969). In addition to the surface-water quality data collected from the 70 stations that form the AWQMN, selected data collected as part of other cooperative efforts are included in this report to help summarize water-quality conditions across the State. Water samples also are collected by the USGS at two USGS National Stream Quality Assessment Network (NASQAN; a national water-quality sampling network operated by the USGS, see https://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/ home) stations. Sediment samples collected at four USGS streamflow-gaging stations are presented in this report. These samples are collected as part of a larger monitoring effort in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The suspended-sediment concentration data in this report ar
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Survey of fish assemblages in the upper Neversink River and upper Rondout Creek, New York, 2017–19 Distribution and demography of coastal cactus wrens (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) in southern San Diego County, California—2020 data summary Water-level data for the Albuquerque Basin and adjacent areas, central New Mexico, period of record through September 30, 2020 Distribution and abundance of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the upper San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California—2020 data summary Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Middle San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, southern California—2019 data summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1