引言:种族灭绝的非国家方面

Q3 Social Sciences Genocide Studies International Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.3138/GSI.10.2.01
H. Theriault, Hazel M. G. Cameron
{"title":"引言:种族灭绝的非国家方面","authors":"H. Theriault, Hazel M. G. Cameron","doi":"10.3138/GSI.10.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sixth issue of Genocide Studies International takes up the issue of non-state aspects of genocide. The editors originally conceived the topic as non-state actors and genocide, with the term ‘‘non-state actor’’ referring to non-governmental organizations and institutions; official and unofficial political organizations and groups; civic organizations; political and social movements; terrorist organizations; ‘‘deep state’’ networks; paramilitary or armed rebel groups; corporations; criminal organizations; educational, religious, spiritual, cultural, artistic, athletic institutions, organizations, and groups; and any other such entity that is not part of a national, regional, or local government or an international organization created by and comprised of state members, committing or complicit in genocide, bystanders to genocide, victims of genocide, interveners against genocide, or supporters of victims after genocide. GSI received excellent submissions within this range of issues, including a research note that considers the role of NGOs during the Rwanda Genocide and the functioning of the so-called Islamic State as a pseudo-state terrorist organization committing genocide in a war of conquest against various non-state minority groups, including the Yezidis, who have been relegated to the margins of twentieth and twenty-first century politics because of their non-state or low status even among minority groups. But, as we received submissions in response to the call for papers, it became clear to us that the term ‘‘non-state’’ is much more complex and far-reaching than we had previously considered, and refers not only to types of actors but also levels of impact and activity. This is demonstrated by a submission that is one of the first works to look at members of a post-genocide diaspora of perpetrator, rather than victim, group (Germany) and their role in Holocaust denial and identity construction, which is at variance with recognition of the genocide and contemporary notions of German identity in the home state. It then became apparent that even two manuscripts not originally intended for inclusion in this special issue are in fact of great relevance to non-state aspects of genocide. Contrary to the typical focus of victim group political self-advocacy, one of these highlights the means by which memory is transmitted across victim group generations in forms intentionally removed from state intrusion and control. The other sheds light on the complex and intricate process by which genocide has reshaped gender norms in Rwandan society, with both state and non-state forces being integral. With these varied articles in mind, the topic of this special issue evolved into ‘‘non-state aspects of genocide.’’ The first two articles in this issue, Fazil Moradi and Kjell Anderson’s ‘‘The Islamic State’s Êzı̂dı̂ Genocide in Iraq: The ‘Sinja #r Operations’ ’’ and Hannibal Travis’ ‘‘Why","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"10 1","pages":"115 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Non-State Aspects of Genocide\",\"authors\":\"H. Theriault, Hazel M. G. Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/GSI.10.2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sixth issue of Genocide Studies International takes up the issue of non-state aspects of genocide. The editors originally conceived the topic as non-state actors and genocide, with the term ‘‘non-state actor’’ referring to non-governmental organizations and institutions; official and unofficial political organizations and groups; civic organizations; political and social movements; terrorist organizations; ‘‘deep state’’ networks; paramilitary or armed rebel groups; corporations; criminal organizations; educational, religious, spiritual, cultural, artistic, athletic institutions, organizations, and groups; and any other such entity that is not part of a national, regional, or local government or an international organization created by and comprised of state members, committing or complicit in genocide, bystanders to genocide, victims of genocide, interveners against genocide, or supporters of victims after genocide. GSI received excellent submissions within this range of issues, including a research note that considers the role of NGOs during the Rwanda Genocide and the functioning of the so-called Islamic State as a pseudo-state terrorist organization committing genocide in a war of conquest against various non-state minority groups, including the Yezidis, who have been relegated to the margins of twentieth and twenty-first century politics because of their non-state or low status even among minority groups. But, as we received submissions in response to the call for papers, it became clear to us that the term ‘‘non-state’’ is much more complex and far-reaching than we had previously considered, and refers not only to types of actors but also levels of impact and activity. This is demonstrated by a submission that is one of the first works to look at members of a post-genocide diaspora of perpetrator, rather than victim, group (Germany) and their role in Holocaust denial and identity construction, which is at variance with recognition of the genocide and contemporary notions of German identity in the home state. It then became apparent that even two manuscripts not originally intended for inclusion in this special issue are in fact of great relevance to non-state aspects of genocide. Contrary to the typical focus of victim group political self-advocacy, one of these highlights the means by which memory is transmitted across victim group generations in forms intentionally removed from state intrusion and control. The other sheds light on the complex and intricate process by which genocide has reshaped gender norms in Rwandan society, with both state and non-state forces being integral. With these varied articles in mind, the topic of this special issue evolved into ‘‘non-state aspects of genocide.’’ The first two articles in this issue, Fazil Moradi and Kjell Anderson’s ‘‘The Islamic State’s Êzı̂dı̂ Genocide in Iraq: The ‘Sinja #r Operations’ ’’ and Hannibal Travis’ ‘‘Why\",\"PeriodicalId\":40844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.10.2.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.10.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《国际灭绝种族研究》第六期讨论了灭绝种族的非国家方面问题。编辑们最初设想的主题是“非国家行为者和种族灭绝”,“非国家行为者”一词是指非政府组织和机构;官方和非官方的政治组织和团体;民间组织;政治和社会运动;恐怖组织;“深层政府”网络;准军事或武装反叛集团;企业;犯罪组织;教育、宗教、精神、文化、艺术、体育机构、组织和团体;以及不属于国家、地区或地方政府或由成员国创建和组成的国际组织的任何其他此类实体,犯下或共谋种族灭绝,种族灭绝的旁观者,种族灭绝的受害者,反对种族灭绝的干预者或种族灭绝后受害者的支持者。GSI在这一系列问题中收到了优秀的意见书,其中包括一份研究说明,其中审议了非政府组织在卢旺达种族灭绝期间的作用,以及所谓的伊斯兰国作为一个伪国家恐怖主义组织在征服战争中对包括雅兹迪人在内的各种非国家少数群体实施种族灭绝的运作。他们在20世纪和21世纪的政治中被边缘化,因为他们的非国家地位或地位低下,甚至在少数群体中也是如此。但是,当我们收到响应论文征集的意见书时,我们清楚地认识到,“非国家”一词比我们以前考虑的要复杂和深远得多,它不仅指行为者的类型,还指影响和活动的水平。这一点在一份提交的作品中得到了证明,该作品是首批审视种族灭绝后流散的犯罪者(而不是受害者)群体(德国)成员及其在否认大屠杀和身份建构中的作用的作品之一,这与承认种族灭绝和当代德国身份在本国的概念是不一致的。后来很明显,即使是原本不打算列入本期特刊的两份手稿,实际上也与种族灭绝的非国家方面有很大关系。与受害者群体政治自我倡导的典型焦点相反,其中之一突出了记忆在受害者群体世代之间传播的方式,这种方式有意地从国家入侵和控制中移除。另一个则揭示了种族灭绝在国家和非国家力量不可或缺的情况下重塑卢旺达社会性别规范的复杂和错综复杂的过程。考虑到这些不同的文章,本期特刊的主题演变为“种族灭绝的非国家方面”。本期的前两篇文章,分别是Fazil Moradi和Kjell Anderson的《伊斯兰国在伊拉克的Êzı大屠杀:‘辛加#r行动’》和Hannibal Travis的《为什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: Non-State Aspects of Genocide
The sixth issue of Genocide Studies International takes up the issue of non-state aspects of genocide. The editors originally conceived the topic as non-state actors and genocide, with the term ‘‘non-state actor’’ referring to non-governmental organizations and institutions; official and unofficial political organizations and groups; civic organizations; political and social movements; terrorist organizations; ‘‘deep state’’ networks; paramilitary or armed rebel groups; corporations; criminal organizations; educational, religious, spiritual, cultural, artistic, athletic institutions, organizations, and groups; and any other such entity that is not part of a national, regional, or local government or an international organization created by and comprised of state members, committing or complicit in genocide, bystanders to genocide, victims of genocide, interveners against genocide, or supporters of victims after genocide. GSI received excellent submissions within this range of issues, including a research note that considers the role of NGOs during the Rwanda Genocide and the functioning of the so-called Islamic State as a pseudo-state terrorist organization committing genocide in a war of conquest against various non-state minority groups, including the Yezidis, who have been relegated to the margins of twentieth and twenty-first century politics because of their non-state or low status even among minority groups. But, as we received submissions in response to the call for papers, it became clear to us that the term ‘‘non-state’’ is much more complex and far-reaching than we had previously considered, and refers not only to types of actors but also levels of impact and activity. This is demonstrated by a submission that is one of the first works to look at members of a post-genocide diaspora of perpetrator, rather than victim, group (Germany) and their role in Holocaust denial and identity construction, which is at variance with recognition of the genocide and contemporary notions of German identity in the home state. It then became apparent that even two manuscripts not originally intended for inclusion in this special issue are in fact of great relevance to non-state aspects of genocide. Contrary to the typical focus of victim group political self-advocacy, one of these highlights the means by which memory is transmitted across victim group generations in forms intentionally removed from state intrusion and control. The other sheds light on the complex and intricate process by which genocide has reshaped gender norms in Rwandan society, with both state and non-state forces being integral. With these varied articles in mind, the topic of this special issue evolved into ‘‘non-state aspects of genocide.’’ The first two articles in this issue, Fazil Moradi and Kjell Anderson’s ‘‘The Islamic State’s Êzı̂dı̂ Genocide in Iraq: The ‘Sinja #r Operations’ ’’ and Hannibal Travis’ ‘‘Why
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Armenian Genocide Studies: Development as a Field, Historiographic Appraisal, and the Road Ahead Penal Battalions and Genocidal Warfare: History's Warnings, Wagner's Global Footprint, and Ukraine What Obligation Does the Global Community Have to Prevent Genocide, and What Form(s) Should these Prevention Efforts Take? Quality Genocide Education in American Schools: An Armenian Lens for Hope From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1