S. Otaka, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Ryuhei Igeta, T. Chiba, S. Ikeda, T. Shiga
{"title":"儿科院外心脏骤停期间医生参与与患者预后之间的关系:一项日本全国范围的观察性研究","authors":"S. Otaka, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Ryuhei Igeta, T. Chiba, S. Ikeda, T. Shiga","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effectiveness of physician involvement during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has been shown in adults but remains unknown in pediatric patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patient outcomes. Methods: Using a Japanese nationwide database, we identified pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2005 to September 2017. We used a generalized linear model to compare outcomes between patients with and without physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurologically favourable survival after 1 month. Secondary outcomes were the return of spontaneous circulation and 1-month survival. Results: In total, 24,684 patients were included in this study. In the adjusted analyses, a ‘physician-present’ group showed a lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rate compared with a ‘physician-absent’ group (difference, -0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7–-0.2; P = 0.02). The physician-present group had a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation than the physician-absent group (difference, 1.4%; 95% CI 0.2–2.5; P = 0.02), but no difference in 1-month survival was observed between the groups (difference, -0.9%; 95% CI -2.0–0.2; P = 0.09). Conclusions: Physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rates, although it was associated with a better return of spontaneous circulation than that in the physician-absent group.","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Physician Involvement During Pediatric Out-of- Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Patient Outcomes: a Japanese Nation-Wide Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Otaka, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Ryuhei Igeta, T. Chiba, S. Ikeda, T. Shiga\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/fccm.92920279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The effectiveness of physician involvement during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has been shown in adults but remains unknown in pediatric patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patient outcomes. Methods: Using a Japanese nationwide database, we identified pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2005 to September 2017. We used a generalized linear model to compare outcomes between patients with and without physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurologically favourable survival after 1 month. Secondary outcomes were the return of spontaneous circulation and 1-month survival. Results: In total, 24,684 patients were included in this study. In the adjusted analyses, a ‘physician-present’ group showed a lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rate compared with a ‘physician-absent’ group (difference, -0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7–-0.2; P = 0.02). The physician-present group had a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation than the physician-absent group (difference, 1.4%; 95% CI 0.2–2.5; P = 0.02), but no difference in 1-month survival was observed between the groups (difference, -0.9%; 95% CI -2.0–0.2; P = 0.09). Conclusions: Physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rates, although it was associated with a better return of spontaneous circulation than that in the physician-absent group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:院外心脏骤停期间医生介入的有效性已在成人中得到证实,但在儿科患者中尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨儿科院外心脏骤停与患者预后之间的关系。方法:使用日本全国数据库,我们确定了2005年1月至2017年9月期间院外心脏骤停的儿科患者。我们使用广义线性模型来比较有医生参与和没有医生参与的儿童院外心脏骤停患者的结果。主要结局是1个月后神经系统有利的生存。次要结局是自发循环的恢复和1个月的生存。结果:共纳入24684例患者。在调整后的分析中,“有医生在场”组的1个月神经系统有利生存率低于“没有医生在场”组(差异为-0.9%;95%置信区间[CI] -1.7—0.2;P = 0.02)。医生在场组的自发循环恢复率高于没有医生在场组(差异为1.4%;95% ci 0.2-2.5;P = 0.02),但组间1个月生存率无差异(差异-0.9%;95% ci -2.0-0.2;P = 0.09)。结论:在儿科院外心脏骤停期间,医生参与与较低的1个月神经系统有利生存率相关,尽管与没有医生的组相比,它与更好的自然循环恢复相关。
The Association between Physician Involvement During Pediatric Out-of- Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Patient Outcomes: a Japanese Nation-Wide Observational Study
Background: The effectiveness of physician involvement during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has been shown in adults but remains unknown in pediatric patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patient outcomes. Methods: Using a Japanese nationwide database, we identified pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2005 to September 2017. We used a generalized linear model to compare outcomes between patients with and without physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurologically favourable survival after 1 month. Secondary outcomes were the return of spontaneous circulation and 1-month survival. Results: In total, 24,684 patients were included in this study. In the adjusted analyses, a ‘physician-present’ group showed a lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rate compared with a ‘physician-absent’ group (difference, -0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7–-0.2; P = 0.02). The physician-present group had a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation than the physician-absent group (difference, 1.4%; 95% CI 0.2–2.5; P = 0.02), but no difference in 1-month survival was observed between the groups (difference, -0.9%; 95% CI -2.0–0.2; P = 0.09). Conclusions: Physician involvement during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 1-month neurologically favourable survival rates, although it was associated with a better return of spontaneous circulation than that in the physician-absent group.