Dong Jung Kim, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. Lim, Kay-Hyun Park, H. Chang
{"title":"静脉体外膜氧合支持患者无肝素策略的安全性","authors":"Dong Jung Kim, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. Lim, Kay-Hyun Park, H. Chang","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The necessity of heparinization during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well documented. However, heparinization can increase the risk of bleeding in certain situations. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of a heparin-free strategy in patients on VA-ECMO. Methods: Data for 90 adult patients on VA-ECMO, wherein cannulation and maintenance were performed by cardiothoracic surgeons and support was provided for >24 h (2018–2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: heparin-free group, without heparinization for ≥ 24 h during VA-ECMO support (n = 66), and control group (n = 24). Clinical outcomes including hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The reasons for VA-ECMO support included post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 37 patients (41.1%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44 patients (48.9%). The total duration of VA-ECMO was not significantly different between the two groups (132.3±106.1 vs. 141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734). In the heparin-free group, the duration of VA-ECMO without heparinization was 79.8±60.7 h, and 26 patients (39.4%) were completely heparin-free during the support period. No significant difference was found in the frequency of oxygenator changes due to thrombosis between the two groups (8.3 vs. 10.6%, P>0.999). Pump malfunction was not observed in any group. The overall incidence of thromboembolic complications was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: No additional risk of thromboembolic complications was observed with the use of a heparin-free strategy during VA-ECMO support. Appropriate discontinuation of heparinization could be a safe strategy for VA-ECMO patients with active bleeding or a high hemorrhagic risk.","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Safety of Heparin-Free Strategy in Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation\",\"authors\":\"Dong Jung Kim, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. Lim, Kay-Hyun Park, H. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/fccm.92920339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The necessity of heparinization during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well documented. However, heparinization can increase the risk of bleeding in certain situations. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of a heparin-free strategy in patients on VA-ECMO. Methods: Data for 90 adult patients on VA-ECMO, wherein cannulation and maintenance were performed by cardiothoracic surgeons and support was provided for >24 h (2018–2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: heparin-free group, without heparinization for ≥ 24 h during VA-ECMO support (n = 66), and control group (n = 24). Clinical outcomes including hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The reasons for VA-ECMO support included post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 37 patients (41.1%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44 patients (48.9%). The total duration of VA-ECMO was not significantly different between the two groups (132.3±106.1 vs. 141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734). In the heparin-free group, the duration of VA-ECMO without heparinization was 79.8±60.7 h, and 26 patients (39.4%) were completely heparin-free during the support period. No significant difference was found in the frequency of oxygenator changes due to thrombosis between the two groups (8.3 vs. 10.6%, P>0.999). Pump malfunction was not observed in any group. The overall incidence of thromboembolic complications was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: No additional risk of thromboembolic complications was observed with the use of a heparin-free strategy during VA-ECMO support. Appropriate discontinuation of heparinization could be a safe strategy for VA-ECMO patients with active bleeding or a high hemorrhagic risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)过程中肝素化的必要性已得到充分证明。然而,在某些情况下,肝素化会增加出血的风险。本研究的目的是调查无肝素策略在VA-ECMO患者中的安全性。方法:回顾性分析90例成人VA-ECMO患者的数据,这些患者由心胸外科医生进行插管和维持,并提供bbbb24 h(2018-2021)的支持。将患者分为两组:无肝素组(66例)和对照组(24例)。无肝素组在VA-ECMO支持期间不进行肝素化治疗≥24 h。比较两组的临床结果,包括出血和血栓栓塞并发症。结果:采用VA-ECMO支持的原因包括开心术后心源性休克37例(41.1%),体外心肺复苏44例(48.9%)。VA-ECMO总持续时间两组比较差异无统计学意义(132.3±106.1∶141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734)。无肝素组未肝素化的VA-ECMO持续时间为79.8±60.7 h, 26例(39.4%)患者在支持期内完全无肝素。两组患者因血栓形成而改变氧合器的频率差异无统计学意义(8.3 vs 10.6%, P < 0.05 0.999)。各组均未见泵故障。两组血栓栓塞并发症的总发生率无显著差异。结论:在VA-ECMO支持期间,使用无肝素策略未观察到血栓栓塞并发症的额外风险。对于有活动性出血或高出血风险的VA-ECMO患者,适当停止肝素化可能是一种安全的策略。
The Safety of Heparin-Free Strategy in Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Background: The necessity of heparinization during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well documented. However, heparinization can increase the risk of bleeding in certain situations. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of a heparin-free strategy in patients on VA-ECMO. Methods: Data for 90 adult patients on VA-ECMO, wherein cannulation and maintenance were performed by cardiothoracic surgeons and support was provided for >24 h (2018–2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: heparin-free group, without heparinization for ≥ 24 h during VA-ECMO support (n = 66), and control group (n = 24). Clinical outcomes including hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The reasons for VA-ECMO support included post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 37 patients (41.1%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44 patients (48.9%). The total duration of VA-ECMO was not significantly different between the two groups (132.3±106.1 vs. 141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734). In the heparin-free group, the duration of VA-ECMO without heparinization was 79.8±60.7 h, and 26 patients (39.4%) were completely heparin-free during the support period. No significant difference was found in the frequency of oxygenator changes due to thrombosis between the two groups (8.3 vs. 10.6%, P>0.999). Pump malfunction was not observed in any group. The overall incidence of thromboembolic complications was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: No additional risk of thromboembolic complications was observed with the use of a heparin-free strategy during VA-ECMO support. Appropriate discontinuation of heparinization could be a safe strategy for VA-ECMO patients with active bleeding or a high hemorrhagic risk.