家庭、私有财产和国家:狄昂夫妇和多伦多鹤德比

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES Pub Date : 1995-01-01 DOI:10.3138/JCS.29.4.15
Mariana Valverde
{"title":"家庭、私有财产和国家:狄昂夫妇和多伦多鹤德比","authors":"Mariana Valverde","doi":"10.3138/JCS.29.4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the middle of the Great Depression, a number of state institutions in Ontario (the legislature, the judiciary, the Attorney - General's office) felt called upon to administer two sets of \"problem\" families. One was the Dionnes, the other those competing in the Toronto Stork Derby. The former \"group\" was perceived by the Hepburn government as two distinct families: the Quintuplets on the one hand, and their five siblings and parents on the other. In 1934, the Ontario government declared itself the true parent of the newborn Quintuplets and made a complete physical as well as legal separation between them and their kin. Eventually the Quints were legally and physically reunited with the other Dionnes, at a time when their fame and fortune had in any case been rather exhausted, and control over their trust fund was no longer a source of wages to many retainers and of tourist revenue to the province. A close analysis of the government documents on the Dionne case reveals that the Quintuplets were not dealt with as children in need of state protection: the Children's Aid Society was not involved.(f.1) Rather, they were managed as natural resources or scenic wonders requiring nationalization. In other words, the guardianship of the five little girls had very little to do with child welfare or family policy; rather, it became an aspect of provincial economic policy. Just as the \"natural beauty\" of Niagara Falls has been sold to tourists and exploited by Ontario Hydro, so too the apparently priceless Quintuplets were economically exploited by their legal father, the government of Ontario.The unusual degree of government intervention in the Dionne case stands in contrast to the more laissez - faire position taken by the same government in another regulatory dilemma, namely the so - called Toronto Stork Derby of 1926 - 38. The Stork Derby was occasioned by an eccentric lawyer's will leaving a very large amount of money to the Toronto woman giving birth to the largest number of children over the subsequent 10 years. Immediately after the will was probated, in December of 1926, the Conservative government at Queen's Park attempted to declare the Stork Derby clause invalid on the grounds that it was \"disgusting\" and against the public interest. However a public outcry, mostly from women's groups, managed to reverse the government's decision: both Premier George Henry's government and the subsequent Hepburn government let the various mothers and other potential heirs fight the case out in the courts, with little political interference. The courts, concerned with safeguarding the principle of the autonomy of property owners, decided to uphold the will against the claims of distant relatives, but only after resolving tricky issues regarding the moral and legal status of both children and mothers.A comparison of these two cases raises some interesting questions about the role of the state in the administration of reproduction. The relationship between the state and mothers and children is always analyzed under the rubric of family policy or social policy, but the present study shows that at least some children and mothers were managed and administered through processes normally associated with the regulation of the economy. Property, rather than family, is the central category in both the Dionne and the Stork Derby cases, casting some doubt on historians' generalizations about the 20th century's view of childhood as a sentimental, non - economic category. At a theoretical level, this study shows that instead of assuming the family and the economy to be fixed realms with unchanging boundaries, they might be better regarded as categories in flux, which the state can invoke with astonishing flexibility.(f.2) What is and is not a family question and, even more surprising, what is or is not a child, turns out to be largely a matter of which administrative techniques are brought to bear on a particular situation.A Human Goldmine to their Province\": The Paternal State and the Dionne QuintupletsElzire Dionne, a 25 - year - old francophone farm woman living in the village of Corbeil near North Bay, Ontario gave birth to five identical girls in May of 1934. …","PeriodicalId":45057,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","volume":"29 1","pages":"15-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Families, Private Property, and the State: The Dionnes and the Toronto Stork Derby\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Valverde\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/JCS.29.4.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the middle of the Great Depression, a number of state institutions in Ontario (the legislature, the judiciary, the Attorney - General's office) felt called upon to administer two sets of \\\"problem\\\" families. One was the Dionnes, the other those competing in the Toronto Stork Derby. The former \\\"group\\\" was perceived by the Hepburn government as two distinct families: the Quintuplets on the one hand, and their five siblings and parents on the other. In 1934, the Ontario government declared itself the true parent of the newborn Quintuplets and made a complete physical as well as legal separation between them and their kin. Eventually the Quints were legally and physically reunited with the other Dionnes, at a time when their fame and fortune had in any case been rather exhausted, and control over their trust fund was no longer a source of wages to many retainers and of tourist revenue to the province. A close analysis of the government documents on the Dionne case reveals that the Quintuplets were not dealt with as children in need of state protection: the Children's Aid Society was not involved.(f.1) Rather, they were managed as natural resources or scenic wonders requiring nationalization. In other words, the guardianship of the five little girls had very little to do with child welfare or family policy; rather, it became an aspect of provincial economic policy. Just as the \\\"natural beauty\\\" of Niagara Falls has been sold to tourists and exploited by Ontario Hydro, so too the apparently priceless Quintuplets were economically exploited by their legal father, the government of Ontario.The unusual degree of government intervention in the Dionne case stands in contrast to the more laissez - faire position taken by the same government in another regulatory dilemma, namely the so - called Toronto Stork Derby of 1926 - 38. The Stork Derby was occasioned by an eccentric lawyer's will leaving a very large amount of money to the Toronto woman giving birth to the largest number of children over the subsequent 10 years. Immediately after the will was probated, in December of 1926, the Conservative government at Queen's Park attempted to declare the Stork Derby clause invalid on the grounds that it was \\\"disgusting\\\" and against the public interest. However a public outcry, mostly from women's groups, managed to reverse the government's decision: both Premier George Henry's government and the subsequent Hepburn government let the various mothers and other potential heirs fight the case out in the courts, with little political interference. The courts, concerned with safeguarding the principle of the autonomy of property owners, decided to uphold the will against the claims of distant relatives, but only after resolving tricky issues regarding the moral and legal status of both children and mothers.A comparison of these two cases raises some interesting questions about the role of the state in the administration of reproduction. The relationship between the state and mothers and children is always analyzed under the rubric of family policy or social policy, but the present study shows that at least some children and mothers were managed and administered through processes normally associated with the regulation of the economy. Property, rather than family, is the central category in both the Dionne and the Stork Derby cases, casting some doubt on historians' generalizations about the 20th century's view of childhood as a sentimental, non - economic category. At a theoretical level, this study shows that instead of assuming the family and the economy to be fixed realms with unchanging boundaries, they might be better regarded as categories in flux, which the state can invoke with astonishing flexibility.(f.2) What is and is not a family question and, even more surprising, what is or is not a child, turns out to be largely a matter of which administrative techniques are brought to bear on a particular situation.A Human Goldmine to their Province\\\": The Paternal State and the Dionne QuintupletsElzire Dionne, a 25 - year - old francophone farm woman living in the village of Corbeil near North Bay, Ontario gave birth to five identical girls in May of 1934. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":45057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"15-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/JCS.29.4.15\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JCS.29.4.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在大萧条中期,安大略省的一些州立机构(立法机关、司法机关、总检察长办公室)感到有责任管理两类“问题”家庭。一个是戴奥尼斯,另一个是参加多伦多鹤德比的。赫本政府认为,前一个“群体”是两个不同的家庭:一方面是五胞胎,另一方面是他们的五个兄弟姐妹和父母。1934年,安大略省政府宣布自己是新生五胞胎的真正父母,并在身体上和法律上将他们与他们的亲属完全分离。最终,昆特家族在法律上和实体上与其他狄奥涅家族团聚,当时他们的名声和财富无论如何都已耗尽,对他们信托基金的控制不再是许多雇佣者的工资来源,也不再是该省旅游收入的来源。对Dionne案的政府文件的仔细分析表明,五胞胎并没有作为需要国家保护的儿童来处理:儿童援助协会没有参与其中。(f.1)相反,他们被当作需要国有化的自然资源或风景名胜来管理。换句话说,五个小女孩的监护权与儿童福利或家庭政策几乎没有关系;相反,它成为省级经济政策的一个方面。正如尼亚加拉瀑布的“自然美”被出售给游客并被安大略省水电公司利用一样,这对看似无价的五胞胎也被他们的合法父亲安大略省政府在经济上剥削了。政府在迪翁案中异乎寻常的干预程度,与同一政府在另一场监管困境(即1926 - 38年所谓的多伦多鹤德比)中采取的更为自由放任的立场形成了鲜明对比。鹳德比是由一个古怪的律师的遗嘱引起的,遗嘱中留下了一大笔钱给多伦多的一名妇女,她在随后的10年里生了最多的孩子。1926年12月,在遗嘱被认证后,女王公园的保守党政府立即试图宣布鹳德比条款无效,理由是它“令人厌恶”,违背了公众利益。然而,公众的强烈抗议,主要来自妇女团体,成功地改变了政府的决定:乔治·亨利总理的政府和后来的赫本政府都让不同的母亲和其他潜在继承人在法庭上打官司,几乎没有政治干预。法院考虑到维护财产所有者的自主权原则,决定支持遗嘱,反对远亲的要求,但只有在解决了有关儿童和母亲的道德和法律地位的棘手问题之后。对这两种情况的比较提出了一些关于国家在生育管理中的作用的有趣问题。国家与母亲和儿童之间的关系总是在家庭政策或社会政策的标题下进行分析,但目前的研究表明,至少有一些儿童和母亲是通过通常与经济监管相关的过程来管理和管理的。在迪翁和斯托克·德比的案例中,财产而不是家庭是核心范畴,这让人们对历史学家关于20世纪童年是感性的、非经济范畴的观点的概括产生了一些怀疑。在理论层面,本研究显示,而不是假设固定的家庭和经济领域与不变的界限,他们会更好的被视为类别在不断变化,国家可以调用以惊人的灵活性。(f.2)是什么和不是一个家庭的问题,更令人吃惊的是,什么是或不是一个孩子,是主要的问题,管理技术是依赖于一个特定的情况。“他们省的人类金矿”:父亲的状态和迪翁的五胞胎塞尔齐尔·迪翁是一位25岁的讲法语的农家妇女,住在安大略省北湾附近的科贝尔村,1934年5月,她生下了五个一模一样的女孩。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Families, Private Property, and the State: The Dionnes and the Toronto Stork Derby
In the middle of the Great Depression, a number of state institutions in Ontario (the legislature, the judiciary, the Attorney - General's office) felt called upon to administer two sets of "problem" families. One was the Dionnes, the other those competing in the Toronto Stork Derby. The former "group" was perceived by the Hepburn government as two distinct families: the Quintuplets on the one hand, and their five siblings and parents on the other. In 1934, the Ontario government declared itself the true parent of the newborn Quintuplets and made a complete physical as well as legal separation between them and their kin. Eventually the Quints were legally and physically reunited with the other Dionnes, at a time when their fame and fortune had in any case been rather exhausted, and control over their trust fund was no longer a source of wages to many retainers and of tourist revenue to the province. A close analysis of the government documents on the Dionne case reveals that the Quintuplets were not dealt with as children in need of state protection: the Children's Aid Society was not involved.(f.1) Rather, they were managed as natural resources or scenic wonders requiring nationalization. In other words, the guardianship of the five little girls had very little to do with child welfare or family policy; rather, it became an aspect of provincial economic policy. Just as the "natural beauty" of Niagara Falls has been sold to tourists and exploited by Ontario Hydro, so too the apparently priceless Quintuplets were economically exploited by their legal father, the government of Ontario.The unusual degree of government intervention in the Dionne case stands in contrast to the more laissez - faire position taken by the same government in another regulatory dilemma, namely the so - called Toronto Stork Derby of 1926 - 38. The Stork Derby was occasioned by an eccentric lawyer's will leaving a very large amount of money to the Toronto woman giving birth to the largest number of children over the subsequent 10 years. Immediately after the will was probated, in December of 1926, the Conservative government at Queen's Park attempted to declare the Stork Derby clause invalid on the grounds that it was "disgusting" and against the public interest. However a public outcry, mostly from women's groups, managed to reverse the government's decision: both Premier George Henry's government and the subsequent Hepburn government let the various mothers and other potential heirs fight the case out in the courts, with little political interference. The courts, concerned with safeguarding the principle of the autonomy of property owners, decided to uphold the will against the claims of distant relatives, but only after resolving tricky issues regarding the moral and legal status of both children and mothers.A comparison of these two cases raises some interesting questions about the role of the state in the administration of reproduction. The relationship between the state and mothers and children is always analyzed under the rubric of family policy or social policy, but the present study shows that at least some children and mothers were managed and administered through processes normally associated with the regulation of the economy. Property, rather than family, is the central category in both the Dionne and the Stork Derby cases, casting some doubt on historians' generalizations about the 20th century's view of childhood as a sentimental, non - economic category. At a theoretical level, this study shows that instead of assuming the family and the economy to be fixed realms with unchanging boundaries, they might be better regarded as categories in flux, which the state can invoke with astonishing flexibility.(f.2) What is and is not a family question and, even more surprising, what is or is not a child, turns out to be largely a matter of which administrative techniques are brought to bear on a particular situation.A Human Goldmine to their Province": The Paternal State and the Dionne QuintupletsElzire Dionne, a 25 - year - old francophone farm woman living in the village of Corbeil near North Bay, Ontario gave birth to five identical girls in May of 1934. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Making Markets out of Vice: Gambling, Cannabis, and Processes of State Legitimation and Formation in Canada Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873 From Pride to Lies: English-Language Print Media Coverage of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions on Women’s Defensive Violence When Victims Look like Criminals: Rehumanizing Victim Representation in the Bruce McArthur Serial Killer Case A Message from the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1