核燃料设施地震风险评估的简化混合方法改进

K. Mori
{"title":"核燃料设施地震风险评估的简化混合方法改进","authors":"K. Mori","doi":"10.3327/taesj.j18.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"hybrid method proposed by Kennedy is referred to ( e.g., in the Atomic Energy Society of Japan standard ( draft ) on the risk assessment method for nuclear fuel facilities ) as one of the seismic probabilistic risk assessment methods for nuclear fuel facilities. Although this method enables us to easily evaluate a plant ʼ s annual probability of failure, the evaluated probability may occasionally be overestimated or underestimated depending on the analysis case. Such a tenden-cy is a major obstacle to judging the appropriateness of the evaluation results of the method. In this paper, the cause of overestimation and underestimation is analyzed, and ways to improve the simplified hybrid method are studied and proposed to enable evaluation results within an acceptable range, which is defined in this paper, to be obtained.","PeriodicalId":55893,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of the Simplified Hybrid Method for Seismic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Fuel Facilities\",\"authors\":\"K. Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.3327/taesj.j18.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"hybrid method proposed by Kennedy is referred to ( e.g., in the Atomic Energy Society of Japan standard ( draft ) on the risk assessment method for nuclear fuel facilities ) as one of the seismic probabilistic risk assessment methods for nuclear fuel facilities. Although this method enables us to easily evaluate a plant ʼ s annual probability of failure, the evaluated probability may occasionally be overestimated or underestimated depending on the analysis case. Such a tenden-cy is a major obstacle to judging the appropriateness of the evaluation results of the method. In this paper, the cause of overestimation and underestimation is analyzed, and ways to improve the simplified hybrid method are studied and proposed to enable evaluation results within an acceptable range, which is defined in this paper, to be obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3327/taesj.j18.037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3327/taesj.j18.037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Kennedy提出的混合方法(如日本原子能学会关于核燃料设施风险评估方法的标准(草案))是核燃料设施地震概率风险评估方法之一。虽然这种方法使我们能够很容易地评估一个工厂的年故障概率,但根据分析案例的不同,评估的概率有时会被高估或低估。这种倾向是判断该方法评价结果是否适当的主要障碍。本文分析了高估和低估的原因,研究并提出了改进简化混合方法的方法,使评估结果在本文定义的可接受范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement of the Simplified Hybrid Method for Seismic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Fuel Facilities
hybrid method proposed by Kennedy is referred to ( e.g., in the Atomic Energy Society of Japan standard ( draft ) on the risk assessment method for nuclear fuel facilities ) as one of the seismic probabilistic risk assessment methods for nuclear fuel facilities. Although this method enables us to easily evaluate a plant ʼ s annual probability of failure, the evaluated probability may occasionally be overestimated or underestimated depending on the analysis case. Such a tenden-cy is a major obstacle to judging the appropriateness of the evaluation results of the method. In this paper, the cause of overestimation and underestimation is analyzed, and ways to improve the simplified hybrid method are studied and proposed to enable evaluation results within an acceptable range, which is defined in this paper, to be obtained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan Energy-Nuclear Energy and Engineering
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Promotive Effects of Siltfence on Deposition of Suspended Particles: Evaluations of Diffusion Suppression of Radionuclides in Rectangular Open Channel via Numerical Simulations Circulation of Radioactive Cesium in Deciduous Broad-leaved Forests due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident Machine Learning Sintering Density Prediction Model for MOX Fuel Pellet マイナーアクチノイド核変換用窒化物燃料の乾式再処理における崩壊熱の影響 Evaluation of external dose exposure of workers during house demolition and dose reduction work in a difficult-to-return zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1