约克角半岛东南崖营地表散点和岩棚石质文物的技术分析

Q1 Arts and Humanities Queensland Archaeological Research Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI:10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139
W. Pearson
{"title":"约克角半岛东南崖营地表散点和岩棚石质文物的技术分析","authors":"W. Pearson","doi":"10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological analyses of stone artefacts in Australia (e.g. Hiscock 1982; 1984; 1989) and more generally (e.g. Flenniken 1985) have yielded insights into prehistoric human behaviour not obtained by analyses which are more typologically oriented.  To a large extent, previous work of this sort in S.E. Cape York Peninsula has been of the latter variety and have emphasized formal descriptions of assemblages over behavioural implications of technological change.  Nevertheless, major changes in raw material use and artefact size and range have been demonstrated (Flood and Horsfall 1986; Rosenfeld et al 1981; Wright 1971a).  By contrast, this paper targets aspects of two site assemblages in this region which were considered capable of yielding information concerning temporal changes in the way people have used stone for flaking.  These aspects include raw material and artefact size and form (see Hiscock 1984).","PeriodicalId":37597,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Archaeological Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A technical analysis of stone artefacts from Yam Camp surface scatter and rockshelter, S.E. Cape York Peninsula\",\"authors\":\"W. Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technological analyses of stone artefacts in Australia (e.g. Hiscock 1982; 1984; 1989) and more generally (e.g. Flenniken 1985) have yielded insights into prehistoric human behaviour not obtained by analyses which are more typologically oriented.  To a large extent, previous work of this sort in S.E. Cape York Peninsula has been of the latter variety and have emphasized formal descriptions of assemblages over behavioural implications of technological change.  Nevertheless, major changes in raw material use and artefact size and range have been demonstrated (Flood and Horsfall 1986; Rosenfeld et al 1981; Wright 1971a).  By contrast, this paper targets aspects of two site assemblages in this region which were considered capable of yielding information concerning temporal changes in the way people have used stone for flaking.  These aspects include raw material and artefact size and form (see Hiscock 1984).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"91-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

澳大利亚石质文物的技术分析(如Hiscock 1982;1984;1989)和更普遍的(如Flenniken 1985)已经产生了史前人类行为的见解,而不是通过更以类型学为导向的分析获得的。Â在很大程度上,以前在东南约克角半岛进行的这类工作属于后一种类型,并且强调对集合的正式描述,而不是技术变化的行为含义。Â尽管如此,原材料的使用和人工制品的大小和范围已经发生了重大变化(Flood和Horsfall 1986;Rosenfeld et al . 1981;1971年莱特)。Â相比之下,本文的目标是该地区的两个遗址组合,它们被认为能够提供有关人们使用石头剥落方式的时间变化的信息。Â这些方面包括原材料和人工制品的大小和形式(见Hiscock 1984)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A technical analysis of stone artefacts from Yam Camp surface scatter and rockshelter, S.E. Cape York Peninsula
Technological analyses of stone artefacts in Australia (e.g. Hiscock 1982; 1984; 1989) and more generally (e.g. Flenniken 1985) have yielded insights into prehistoric human behaviour not obtained by analyses which are more typologically oriented.  To a large extent, previous work of this sort in S.E. Cape York Peninsula has been of the latter variety and have emphasized formal descriptions of assemblages over behavioural implications of technological change.  Nevertheless, major changes in raw material use and artefact size and range have been demonstrated (Flood and Horsfall 1986; Rosenfeld et al 1981; Wright 1971a).  By contrast, this paper targets aspects of two site assemblages in this region which were considered capable of yielding information concerning temporal changes in the way people have used stone for flaking.  These aspects include raw material and artefact size and form (see Hiscock 1984).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Queensland Archaeological Research
Queensland Archaeological Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Queensland Archaeological Research is a peer-reviewed journal published since 1984 devoted to publishing substantive, original and high-quality archaeological research pertaining to Queensland, Australia and adjacent areas. Data-rich manuscripts are particularly welcome. Queensland Archaeological Research is published in English in one volume each year. Submission of articles to Queensland Archaeological Research is free. Access to articles in Queensland Archaeological Research is free.
期刊最新文献
Weapons of the frontier wars The distribution, chronology and significance of late Holocene aged stone-based structures on Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland Location of historic mass graves from the 1919 Spanish Influenza in the Aboriginal community of Cherbourg using geophysics Evidence of external contact between the Pacific Basin and the east coast of Australia during the Holocene: A review Beyond bridge and barrier: Reconceptualising Torres Strait as a co-constructed border zone in ethnographic object distributions between Queensland and New Guinea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1