视觉艺术语境中的“乌托邦”与“反乌托邦”

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 ART Zivot Umjetnosti Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.31664/zu.2022.110.03
Svjetlana Sumpor
{"title":"视觉艺术语境中的“乌托邦”与“反乌托邦”","authors":"Svjetlana Sumpor","doi":"10.31664/zu.2022.110.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the interdisciplinary trajectory of the terms \"utopian\" and \"dystopian\". It acknowledges the fact that \"utopia\" and \"dystopia\" are originally terms from literary theory that refer to specific literary genres. In the light of a recent crossover of the term \"dystopian\" into the vocabulary of art criticism (exhibition reviews and catalogues), as well as a current curatorial fashion of devising exhibitions on the basis of binary opposites of \"utopian\" and \"dystopian\", the paper aims to define the range of meanings, connotations and denotations of the terms \"utopian\" and \"dystopian\" in visual arts, by means of discussing the particular contexts in which they are used. The use of the term \"dystopian\" is discussed in the context of the following artists: Alexis Rockman, Michael Kerbow, Fabrice Monteiro, Kushal Tikle, Alice Tye, Jon Rafman, as well as in the context of Croatian artists Jasenko Rasol and Sebastijan Dračić. The term \"utopian\" is discussed in the context of theoretical discussions about avant-garde art, the socially engaged artistic actions of artists from the second half of the 20th century (in particular, Joseph Beuys), as well as in the context of Croatian art, specifically of Ivan Rabuzin's paintings. The paper argues that, though the terms \"utopian\" and \"dystopian\" are transmedia terms, their range of meaning differs in relation to a particular kind of art they refer to. During the approximately last one hundred years, the term \"utopian\" has been used in theoretical considerations as a means of describing art movements, practices and works. Sometimes it refers to a specific artistic principle, that is, an \"impulse\" or intention of art that implies a desire for social change through art; at other times, it refers to the visual aspect of an artwork, implying idealistic and/or idealising imagining and visualization. The term \"dystopian\" has been employed in the context of visual arts only recently, that is, approximately in the last ten years. It is used with the aim of describing a certain mood or atmosphere. It is usually related to the specific iconographical aspect of a work of art. Art works described as \"dystopian\" most often explore the themes of ecology, consumerism, oppressive social and political systems, power relations and inter-species dynamics. Both utopian and dystopian art is created as a critical response to social reality.","PeriodicalId":41082,"journal":{"name":"Zivot Umjetnosti","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Utopian” and “Dystopian” in the Context of Visual Arts\",\"authors\":\"Svjetlana Sumpor\",\"doi\":\"10.31664/zu.2022.110.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper explores the interdisciplinary trajectory of the terms \\\"utopian\\\" and \\\"dystopian\\\". It acknowledges the fact that \\\"utopia\\\" and \\\"dystopia\\\" are originally terms from literary theory that refer to specific literary genres. In the light of a recent crossover of the term \\\"dystopian\\\" into the vocabulary of art criticism (exhibition reviews and catalogues), as well as a current curatorial fashion of devising exhibitions on the basis of binary opposites of \\\"utopian\\\" and \\\"dystopian\\\", the paper aims to define the range of meanings, connotations and denotations of the terms \\\"utopian\\\" and \\\"dystopian\\\" in visual arts, by means of discussing the particular contexts in which they are used. The use of the term \\\"dystopian\\\" is discussed in the context of the following artists: Alexis Rockman, Michael Kerbow, Fabrice Monteiro, Kushal Tikle, Alice Tye, Jon Rafman, as well as in the context of Croatian artists Jasenko Rasol and Sebastijan Dračić. The term \\\"utopian\\\" is discussed in the context of theoretical discussions about avant-garde art, the socially engaged artistic actions of artists from the second half of the 20th century (in particular, Joseph Beuys), as well as in the context of Croatian art, specifically of Ivan Rabuzin's paintings. The paper argues that, though the terms \\\"utopian\\\" and \\\"dystopian\\\" are transmedia terms, their range of meaning differs in relation to a particular kind of art they refer to. During the approximately last one hundred years, the term \\\"utopian\\\" has been used in theoretical considerations as a means of describing art movements, practices and works. Sometimes it refers to a specific artistic principle, that is, an \\\"impulse\\\" or intention of art that implies a desire for social change through art; at other times, it refers to the visual aspect of an artwork, implying idealistic and/or idealising imagining and visualization. The term \\\"dystopian\\\" has been employed in the context of visual arts only recently, that is, approximately in the last ten years. It is used with the aim of describing a certain mood or atmosphere. It is usually related to the specific iconographical aspect of a work of art. Art works described as \\\"dystopian\\\" most often explore the themes of ecology, consumerism, oppressive social and political systems, power relations and inter-species dynamics. Both utopian and dystopian art is created as a critical response to social reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zivot Umjetnosti\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zivot Umjetnosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31664/zu.2022.110.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zivot Umjetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31664/zu.2022.110.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”这两个术语的交叉发展轨迹。它承认“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”最初是来自文学理论的术语,指的是特定的文学类型。鉴于最近“反乌托邦”一词在艺术批评词汇(展览评论和展览目录)中的交叉,以及当前以“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”二元对立为基础设计展览的策展时尚,本文旨在通过讨论“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”在视觉艺术中使用的特定语境,来定义“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”这两个术语的意义范围、内涵和外延。在以下艺术家的背景下讨论了“反乌托邦”一词的使用:Alexis Rockman, Michael Kerbow, Fabrice Monteiro, Kushal Tikle, Alice Tye, Jon Rafman,以及克罗地亚艺术家Jasenko Rasol和Sebastijan dra。“乌托邦”一词是在关于前卫艺术的理论讨论的背景下讨论的,前卫艺术是20世纪下半叶(特别是约瑟夫·博伊斯)艺术家的社会参与艺术行为,也是在克罗地亚艺术的背景下讨论的,特别是伊万·拉布津的绘画。本文认为,尽管“乌托邦”和“反乌托邦”这两个术语都是跨媒体术语,但它们的含义范围与它们所指的特定艺术类型有关。在过去的大约一百年里,“乌托邦”一词在理论考虑中被用作描述艺术运动、实践和作品的手段。有时它指的是一种特定的艺术原则,即一种艺术的“冲动”或意图,暗示着通过艺术改变社会的愿望;在其他时候,它指的是艺术作品的视觉方面,暗示理想主义和/或理想化的想象和可视化。“反乌托邦”这个词直到最近才在视觉艺术的语境中被使用,也就是说,大约在过去的十年里。它用于描述某种情绪或气氛。它通常与艺术作品的特定图像方面有关。被描述为“反乌托邦”的艺术作品通常探索的主题是生态、消费主义、压迫性的社会和政治制度、权力关系和物种间的动态。乌托邦和反乌托邦艺术都是作为对社会现实的批判性回应而创作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Utopian” and “Dystopian” in the Context of Visual Arts
The paper explores the interdisciplinary trajectory of the terms "utopian" and "dystopian". It acknowledges the fact that "utopia" and "dystopia" are originally terms from literary theory that refer to specific literary genres. In the light of a recent crossover of the term "dystopian" into the vocabulary of art criticism (exhibition reviews and catalogues), as well as a current curatorial fashion of devising exhibitions on the basis of binary opposites of "utopian" and "dystopian", the paper aims to define the range of meanings, connotations and denotations of the terms "utopian" and "dystopian" in visual arts, by means of discussing the particular contexts in which they are used. The use of the term "dystopian" is discussed in the context of the following artists: Alexis Rockman, Michael Kerbow, Fabrice Monteiro, Kushal Tikle, Alice Tye, Jon Rafman, as well as in the context of Croatian artists Jasenko Rasol and Sebastijan Dračić. The term "utopian" is discussed in the context of theoretical discussions about avant-garde art, the socially engaged artistic actions of artists from the second half of the 20th century (in particular, Joseph Beuys), as well as in the context of Croatian art, specifically of Ivan Rabuzin's paintings. The paper argues that, though the terms "utopian" and "dystopian" are transmedia terms, their range of meaning differs in relation to a particular kind of art they refer to. During the approximately last one hundred years, the term "utopian" has been used in theoretical considerations as a means of describing art movements, practices and works. Sometimes it refers to a specific artistic principle, that is, an "impulse" or intention of art that implies a desire for social change through art; at other times, it refers to the visual aspect of an artwork, implying idealistic and/or idealising imagining and visualization. The term "dystopian" has been employed in the context of visual arts only recently, that is, approximately in the last ten years. It is used with the aim of describing a certain mood or atmosphere. It is usually related to the specific iconographical aspect of a work of art. Art works described as "dystopian" most often explore the themes of ecology, consumerism, oppressive social and political systems, power relations and inter-species dynamics. Both utopian and dystopian art is created as a critical response to social reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-Based Photographic Archives and “Potential” Histories of the Cold War in Eastern Europe Field notes revisited Bringing Down the “Archive Fever” Archival Transformations and the Value of Photographic Objects Our Photographs, Old and New
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1