{"title":"肯辛顿石的方言","authors":"S. Fridell, M. Larsson","doi":"10.33063/DIVA-384660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rune-carved block known as the Kensington stone came to light in the year 1898 on a farm in the vicinity of Kensington, Minnesota. Although the inscription dates itself to 1362, it is in many ways extremely difficult to reconcile a medieval origin with the runes and the language of the inscription. The inscription has the following content in a transliterated form in bold-face type (following Williams 2012, 5 f., but with our translation; note that an alternate reading for the first word in the third-to-last line is har):","PeriodicalId":30193,"journal":{"name":"Futhark International Journal of Runic Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dialect of the Kensington Stone\",\"authors\":\"S. Fridell, M. Larsson\",\"doi\":\"10.33063/DIVA-384660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rune-carved block known as the Kensington stone came to light in the year 1898 on a farm in the vicinity of Kensington, Minnesota. Although the inscription dates itself to 1362, it is in many ways extremely difficult to reconcile a medieval origin with the runes and the language of the inscription. The inscription has the following content in a transliterated form in bold-face type (following Williams 2012, 5 f., but with our translation; note that an alternate reading for the first word in the third-to-last line is har):\",\"PeriodicalId\":30193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futhark International Journal of Runic Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futhark International Journal of Runic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33063/DIVA-384660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futhark International Journal of Runic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33063/DIVA-384660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The rune-carved block known as the Kensington stone came to light in the year 1898 on a farm in the vicinity of Kensington, Minnesota. Although the inscription dates itself to 1362, it is in many ways extremely difficult to reconcile a medieval origin with the runes and the language of the inscription. The inscription has the following content in a transliterated form in bold-face type (following Williams 2012, 5 f., but with our translation; note that an alternate reading for the first word in the third-to-last line is har):