菲律宾吕宋岛南部雨滴大小分布对雷达QPE的评价

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3319/tao.2021.02.22.01
Jonathan Macuroy, Wei-Yu Chang, D. Faustino-Eslava, Patricia Ann J. Sanchez, Cristino L. Tiburan Jr., B. Jou
{"title":"菲律宾吕宋岛南部雨滴大小分布对雷达QPE的评价","authors":"Jonathan Macuroy, Wei-Yu Chang, D. Faustino-Eslava, Patricia Ann J. Sanchez, Cristino L. Tiburan Jr., B. Jou","doi":"10.3319/tao.2021.02.22.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyzed the raindrop size distribution (DSD) measured by an optical Parsivel disdrometer in Southern Luzon, Philippines and utilized it to generate dual-pol relations for the nearby Tagaytay radar. The relations were generated using two methods (Method 1 - gamma-based and Method 2 - linear fitting), four time-integration steps (1, 2-, 5, and 10-min) and datasets from two periods (wet season and single event). The resulting quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) calculated from the generated R(Z) relations were compared to rain gauge stations near the disdrometer and were evaluated for the Tropical Storm Yagi Monsoon event of 10 August (2200 UTC) to 11 August (0400 UTC) 2018 using six statistics: Pearson’s correlation; mean error, percent bias, Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, mean absolute error, and root-mean-square error. Results show that the area’s DSD demonstrates relatively larger average raindrop diameters than some of its Asian counterparts, albeit a smaller number in the total number of raindrops when compared with the same areas. In terms of QPE evaluation, results showed a consistent pattern observed wherein the R(Z) relations using finer time steps (1-and 2-min) generally performed better than the longer ones. Moreover, Method 1 dominated Method 2 in terms of error statistics. As expected, Method 2 outperformed Method 1 in terms of r (as Method 2 itself is derived through linear fit). The best derived R(Z) relations were able to outperform other relations in terms of r, NSE, and RMSE. On the other hand, R(K DP ) was able to perform the best in terms of ME, MAE, and pBIAS, reducing the bias of current standard method by up to 74%.","PeriodicalId":22259,"journal":{"name":"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluations on Radar QPE using raindrop size distribution in Southern Luzon, Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Macuroy, Wei-Yu Chang, D. Faustino-Eslava, Patricia Ann J. Sanchez, Cristino L. Tiburan Jr., B. Jou\",\"doi\":\"10.3319/tao.2021.02.22.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study analyzed the raindrop size distribution (DSD) measured by an optical Parsivel disdrometer in Southern Luzon, Philippines and utilized it to generate dual-pol relations for the nearby Tagaytay radar. The relations were generated using two methods (Method 1 - gamma-based and Method 2 - linear fitting), four time-integration steps (1, 2-, 5, and 10-min) and datasets from two periods (wet season and single event). The resulting quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) calculated from the generated R(Z) relations were compared to rain gauge stations near the disdrometer and were evaluated for the Tropical Storm Yagi Monsoon event of 10 August (2200 UTC) to 11 August (0400 UTC) 2018 using six statistics: Pearson’s correlation; mean error, percent bias, Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, mean absolute error, and root-mean-square error. Results show that the area’s DSD demonstrates relatively larger average raindrop diameters than some of its Asian counterparts, albeit a smaller number in the total number of raindrops when compared with the same areas. In terms of QPE evaluation, results showed a consistent pattern observed wherein the R(Z) relations using finer time steps (1-and 2-min) generally performed better than the longer ones. Moreover, Method 1 dominated Method 2 in terms of error statistics. As expected, Method 2 outperformed Method 1 in terms of r (as Method 2 itself is derived through linear fit). The best derived R(Z) relations were able to outperform other relations in terms of r, NSE, and RMSE. On the other hand, R(K DP ) was able to perform the best in terms of ME, MAE, and pBIAS, reducing the bias of current standard method by up to 74%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3319/tao.2021.02.22.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3319/tao.2021.02.22.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

该研究分析了菲律宾吕宋岛南部由光学Parsivel disdrometer测量的雨滴大小分布(DSD),并利用它为附近的Tagaytay雷达生成双极关系。使用两种方法(方法1 -基于伽马的方法和方法2-线性拟合),四个时间积分步骤(1、2、5和10分钟)和来自两个时期(雨季和单一事件)的数据集生成关系。根据生成的R(Z)关系计算得到的定量降水估计值(qpe)与分差仪附近的雨量站进行了比较,并使用六种统计量对2018年8月10日(2200 UTC)至8月11日(0400 UTC)的热带风暴八木季风事件进行了评估:Pearson相关;平均误差、百分比偏差、纳什-萨特克利夫效率、平均绝对误差和均方根误差。结果显示,该地区的DSD平均雨滴直径比亚洲的一些地区要大,尽管与相同地区相比,雨滴总数较少。在QPE评估方面,结果显示了观察到的一致模式,其中使用较细时间步骤(1-和2分钟)的R(Z)关系通常比较长的时间步骤表现更好。在误差统计方面,方法1优于方法2。正如预期的那样,方法2在r方面优于方法1(因为方法2本身是通过线性拟合得出的)。得到的最佳R(Z)关系在R、NSE和RMSE方面优于其他关系。另一方面,R(K DP)在ME、MAE和pBIAS方面表现最好,将当前标准方法的偏差降低了74%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluations on Radar QPE using raindrop size distribution in Southern Luzon, Philippines
The study analyzed the raindrop size distribution (DSD) measured by an optical Parsivel disdrometer in Southern Luzon, Philippines and utilized it to generate dual-pol relations for the nearby Tagaytay radar. The relations were generated using two methods (Method 1 - gamma-based and Method 2 - linear fitting), four time-integration steps (1, 2-, 5, and 10-min) and datasets from two periods (wet season and single event). The resulting quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) calculated from the generated R(Z) relations were compared to rain gauge stations near the disdrometer and were evaluated for the Tropical Storm Yagi Monsoon event of 10 August (2200 UTC) to 11 August (0400 UTC) 2018 using six statistics: Pearson’s correlation; mean error, percent bias, Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, mean absolute error, and root-mean-square error. Results show that the area’s DSD demonstrates relatively larger average raindrop diameters than some of its Asian counterparts, albeit a smaller number in the total number of raindrops when compared with the same areas. In terms of QPE evaluation, results showed a consistent pattern observed wherein the R(Z) relations using finer time steps (1-and 2-min) generally performed better than the longer ones. Moreover, Method 1 dominated Method 2 in terms of error statistics. As expected, Method 2 outperformed Method 1 in terms of r (as Method 2 itself is derived through linear fit). The best derived R(Z) relations were able to outperform other relations in terms of r, NSE, and RMSE. On the other hand, R(K DP ) was able to perform the best in terms of ME, MAE, and pBIAS, reducing the bias of current standard method by up to 74%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The major publication of the Chinese Geoscience Union (located in Taipei) since 1990, the journal of Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (TAO) publishes bi-monthly scientific research articles, notes, correspondences and reviews in all disciplines of the Earth sciences. It is the amalgamation of the following journals: Papers in Meteorological Research (published by the Meteorological Society of the ROC) since Vol. 12, No. 2 Bulletin of Geophysics (published by the Institute of Geophysics, National Central University) since No. 27 Acta Oceanographica Taiwanica (published by the Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University) since Vol. 42.
期刊最新文献
Calibration of satellite typhoon data based on attitude modified buoy A conjugated structure discloses interaction between two fault systems in eastern Taiwan during 2022 Guangfu earthquake Response of ion velocities of daytime ionospheric wavenumber-4 to solar activity observed by ROCSAT-1 and DEMETER Exploring changes in building strength using seismic wave deconvolution An efficient forward semi-Lagrangian model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1