异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒:再激活还是再感染?

М.V. Demin, D. C. Tikhomirov, B. Biderman, О.А. Glinschikova, М.Yu. Drokov, А. Sudarikov, Т.А. Tupoleva, Е.N. Parovitchnikova, F. P. Filatov
{"title":"异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒:再激活还是再感染?","authors":"М.V. Demin, D. C. Tikhomirov, B. Biderman, О.А. Glinschikova, М.Yu. Drokov, А. Sudarikov, Т.А. Tupoleva, Е.N. Parovitchnikova, F. P. Filatov","doi":"10.36488/cmac.2021.2.138-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To determine type of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (reactivation of a virus strain that was present before transplantation or re-infection with another virus strain) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients by sequencing. Materials and Methods. Clinical and laboratory data of 179 recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells collected from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed for CMV DNA in clinical specimens before and after transplantation. A total of 14 patients (28 samples) were included in the study. The CMV UL139 gene encoding viral glycoprotein was chosen for virus genotyping and sequence alignment. The primers complementary to its conservative sites were used. The resulting DNA sequence was analyzed using nucleotide BLAST software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and Genome compiler (https://designer.genomecompiler.com). The type of infection was determined by comparing DNA sequences before and after transplantation. Results. All enrolled patients were anti-CMV-positive prior to transplantation, which indicates the presence of CMV infection. Therefore, none of the patients had a primary infection as a result of transplantation. Of 14 patients, high percentage of sequence alignment (~100%) was observed in 8 patients. For the other 6 patients, substantial differences in sequences which indicate the different genotypes and the different type of infection were found. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to viral DNA appearance after transplantation in patients with re-infection and reactivation (p > 0.05), nor was there a statistically significant correlation between the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) and the main diagnosis or transfusion load. Conclusions. Reactivation of the previously registered viral strain and re-infection with another viral strain were equally probable (8 vs. 6 cases). There were no associations between the main diagnosis and the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) possibly due to a small sample size. Time to post-transplantation CMV DNA detection in blood was longer for re-infection (median of 69.5 days) compared to reactivation (median of 27 days), but this difference was also non-statistically significant. In addition, there was no significant contribution of blood transfusion burden to the type of CMV infection, which may suggest the donor blood is not a source of the different strains.","PeriodicalId":53392,"journal":{"name":"Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: reactivation or reinfection?\",\"authors\":\"М.V. Demin, D. C. Tikhomirov, B. Biderman, О.А. Glinschikova, М.Yu. Drokov, А. Sudarikov, Т.А. Tupoleva, Е.N. Parovitchnikova, F. P. Filatov\",\"doi\":\"10.36488/cmac.2021.2.138-145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To determine type of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (reactivation of a virus strain that was present before transplantation or re-infection with another virus strain) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients by sequencing. Materials and Methods. Clinical and laboratory data of 179 recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells collected from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed for CMV DNA in clinical specimens before and after transplantation. A total of 14 patients (28 samples) were included in the study. The CMV UL139 gene encoding viral glycoprotein was chosen for virus genotyping and sequence alignment. The primers complementary to its conservative sites were used. The resulting DNA sequence was analyzed using nucleotide BLAST software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and Genome compiler (https://designer.genomecompiler.com). The type of infection was determined by comparing DNA sequences before and after transplantation. Results. All enrolled patients were anti-CMV-positive prior to transplantation, which indicates the presence of CMV infection. Therefore, none of the patients had a primary infection as a result of transplantation. Of 14 patients, high percentage of sequence alignment (~100%) was observed in 8 patients. For the other 6 patients, substantial differences in sequences which indicate the different genotypes and the different type of infection were found. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to viral DNA appearance after transplantation in patients with re-infection and reactivation (p > 0.05), nor was there a statistically significant correlation between the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) and the main diagnosis or transfusion load. Conclusions. Reactivation of the previously registered viral strain and re-infection with another viral strain were equally probable (8 vs. 6 cases). There were no associations between the main diagnosis and the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) possibly due to a small sample size. Time to post-transplantation CMV DNA detection in blood was longer for re-infection (median of 69.5 days) compared to reactivation (median of 27 days), but this difference was also non-statistically significant. In addition, there was no significant contribution of blood transfusion burden to the type of CMV infection, which may suggest the donor blood is not a source of the different strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2021.2.138-145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicheskaia mikrobiologiia i antimikrobnaia khimioterapiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2021.2.138-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。通过测序确定同种异体造血干细胞受体的巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染类型(移植前存在的病毒株再激活或再感染另一种病毒株)。材料与方法。对2014 - 2018年收集的179例同种异体造血干细胞受者的临床和实验室资料进行移植前后临床标本的CMV DNA分析。本研究共纳入14例患者(28份样本)。选择编码病毒糖蛋白的CMV UL139基因进行病毒基因分型和序列比对。采用与其保守位点互补的引物。利用核苷酸BLAST软件(https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi)和基因组编译器(https://designer.genomecompiler.com)分析得到的DNA序列。结果:所有入组患者移植前抗巨细胞病毒阳性,提示存在巨细胞病毒感染。因此,没有患者因移植而发生原发性感染。在14例患者中,8例患者的序列比对率高(~100%)。在其他6例患者中,序列存在显著差异,表明不同的基因型和不同的感染类型。再次感染和再激活患者移植后出现病毒DNA的时间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05),感染类型(再激活/再感染)与主要诊断或输血负荷之间也无统计学意义。结论:先前登记的病毒株再激活和再次感染另一病毒株的概率相等(8例vs. 6例)。主要诊断与感染类型(再激活/再感染)之间没有关联,可能是由于样本量小。移植后再感染的CMV DNA检测时间(中位数为69.5天)比再激活的时间(中位数为27天)更长,但这种差异也无统计学意义。此外,输血负担对巨细胞病毒感染的类型没有显著贡献,这可能表明献血者的血液不是不同毒株的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: reactivation or reinfection?
Objective. To determine type of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (reactivation of a virus strain that was present before transplantation or re-infection with another virus strain) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients by sequencing. Materials and Methods. Clinical and laboratory data of 179 recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells collected from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed for CMV DNA in clinical specimens before and after transplantation. A total of 14 patients (28 samples) were included in the study. The CMV UL139 gene encoding viral glycoprotein was chosen for virus genotyping and sequence alignment. The primers complementary to its conservative sites were used. The resulting DNA sequence was analyzed using nucleotide BLAST software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and Genome compiler (https://designer.genomecompiler.com). The type of infection was determined by comparing DNA sequences before and after transplantation. Results. All enrolled patients were anti-CMV-positive prior to transplantation, which indicates the presence of CMV infection. Therefore, none of the patients had a primary infection as a result of transplantation. Of 14 patients, high percentage of sequence alignment (~100%) was observed in 8 patients. For the other 6 patients, substantial differences in sequences which indicate the different genotypes and the different type of infection were found. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to viral DNA appearance after transplantation in patients with re-infection and reactivation (p > 0.05), nor was there a statistically significant correlation between the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) and the main diagnosis or transfusion load. Conclusions. Reactivation of the previously registered viral strain and re-infection with another viral strain were equally probable (8 vs. 6 cases). There were no associations between the main diagnosis and the type of infection (reactivation/re-infection) possibly due to a small sample size. Time to post-transplantation CMV DNA detection in blood was longer for re-infection (median of 69.5 days) compared to reactivation (median of 27 days), but this difference was also non-statistically significant. In addition, there was no significant contribution of blood transfusion burden to the type of CMV infection, which may suggest the donor blood is not a source of the different strains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current approaches and prospects for the development of laboratory diagnosis of measles The known-unknown: third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins combined with sulbactam Prospects for the use of statins in antiviral therapy AMRexpert – online platform for interpretation, verification and validation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing Anti-staphylococcal activity and cytocompatibility of lysostaphin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1