葡萄牙版机构老年人精神健康问卷的验证

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social Pub Date : 2018-02-28 DOI:10.31211/RPICS.2018.4.1.70
Mariana Gomes das Neves, Inês Queiroz Garcia, Helena Espírito-Santo, L. Lemos
{"title":"葡萄牙版机构老年人精神健康问卷的验证","authors":"Mariana Gomes das Neves, Inês Queiroz Garcia, Helena Espírito-Santo, L. Lemos","doi":"10.31211/RPICS.2018.4.1.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objectives: It is undeniable the importance that the concept of spiritual well-being takes today. Research is scarce in the institutionalized older population, and it is therefore important to develop validated tools on spiritual well-being for this population. The main objective of the present study is the analysis of the psychometric properties and the validation of the Portuguese version of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ). Method: The sample included 101 institutionalized older people from the Coimbra area (n = 51, 50.5%) and Aveiro (n = 50, 49.5%), aged 65-96, 33 (32.7%) were male and 68 (67.3%) were female. In addition to SWBQ, the Hope Scale, the Optimism Scale, the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Results: The SWBQ presented a factorial structure of three factors (environmental, transcendental, and humanitarian), different from the original version whose factor structure pointed to four factors. The internal consistency was adequate and the convergent and divergent validity did not confirm its construct validity. Spiritual well-being was statistically different in terms of gender (p < 0.01), marital status (p < 0.05) and occupation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study contributed to the provision of a new instrument for the evaluation of spiritual well-being in institutionalized older people, showing reasonable psychometric characteristics, but should be replicated in samples with other characteristics to confirm this data.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"4 1","pages":"34-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validação da versão portuguesa de Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire em idosos institucionalizados\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Gomes das Neves, Inês Queiroz Garcia, Helena Espírito-Santo, L. Lemos\",\"doi\":\"10.31211/RPICS.2018.4.1.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Objectives: It is undeniable the importance that the concept of spiritual well-being takes today. Research is scarce in the institutionalized older population, and it is therefore important to develop validated tools on spiritual well-being for this population. The main objective of the present study is the analysis of the psychometric properties and the validation of the Portuguese version of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ). Method: The sample included 101 institutionalized older people from the Coimbra area (n = 51, 50.5%) and Aveiro (n = 50, 49.5%), aged 65-96, 33 (32.7%) were male and 68 (67.3%) were female. In addition to SWBQ, the Hope Scale, the Optimism Scale, the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Results: The SWBQ presented a factorial structure of three factors (environmental, transcendental, and humanitarian), different from the original version whose factor structure pointed to four factors. The internal consistency was adequate and the convergent and divergent validity did not confirm its construct validity. Spiritual well-being was statistically different in terms of gender (p < 0.01), marital status (p < 0.05) and occupation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study contributed to the provision of a new instrument for the evaluation of spiritual well-being in institutionalized older people, showing reasonable psychometric characteristics, but should be replicated in samples with other characteristics to confirm this data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"34-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31211/RPICS.2018.4.1.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31211/RPICS.2018.4.1.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景与目的:不可否认的是,精神幸福的概念在今天的重要性。对制度化的老年人口的研究很少,因此,为这一人口开发有效的精神福祉工具是很重要的。本研究的主要目的是分析葡萄牙语版精神幸福感问卷(SWBQ)的心理测量特征并验证其有效性。方法:选取科英布拉地区(n = 51, 50.5%)和阿威罗地区(n = 50, 49.5%)的机构老年人101例,年龄65 ~ 96岁,其中男性33例(32.7%),女性68例(67.3%)。除SWBQ外,还进行了希望量表、乐观量表、老年焦虑量表和老年抑郁量表。结果:SWBQ的因子结构与原版本的因子结构不同,呈现出环境、超验和人道三个因素的因子结构。内部一致性是充分的,收敛效度和发散效度不能证实其构念效度。精神幸福感在性别(p < 0.01)、婚姻状况(p < 0.05)、职业(p < 0.05)上存在统计学差异。结论:本研究为机构老年人精神幸福感的评估提供了一种新的工具,显示出合理的心理测量特征,但需要在具有其他特征的样本中进行复制以证实该数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validação da versão portuguesa de Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire em idosos institucionalizados
Background & Objectives: It is undeniable the importance that the concept of spiritual well-being takes today. Research is scarce in the institutionalized older population, and it is therefore important to develop validated tools on spiritual well-being for this population. The main objective of the present study is the analysis of the psychometric properties and the validation of the Portuguese version of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ). Method: The sample included 101 institutionalized older people from the Coimbra area (n = 51, 50.5%) and Aveiro (n = 50, 49.5%), aged 65-96, 33 (32.7%) were male and 68 (67.3%) were female. In addition to SWBQ, the Hope Scale, the Optimism Scale, the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Results: The SWBQ presented a factorial structure of three factors (environmental, transcendental, and humanitarian), different from the original version whose factor structure pointed to four factors. The internal consistency was adequate and the convergent and divergent validity did not confirm its construct validity. Spiritual well-being was statistically different in terms of gender (p < 0.01), marital status (p < 0.05) and occupation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study contributed to the provision of a new instrument for the evaluation of spiritual well-being in institutionalized older people, showing reasonable psychometric characteristics, but should be replicated in samples with other characteristics to confirm this data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepção de sorofobia entre homens gays que vivem com HIV Maternidades em terras estrangeiras: Uma scoping review das experiências de mulheres migrantes e refugiadas Cyberloafing in the classroom: A qualitative study with Nigerian undergraduate students Gravidez e depressão pós-parto (DPP): uma revisão não sistemática sobre o estado da arte do conhecimento da DPP Preconceito dos estudantes universitários em relação à deficiência: Um estudo exploratório
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1