PANAS在葡萄牙老年人社会反应样本中的验证

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social Pub Date : 2019-11-30 DOI:10.31211/rpics.2019.5.2.160
L. Lemos, Helena Espírito-Santo, Cristiana Duarte-Figueiredo, Diana Santos, Luís Cunha, F. Daniel
{"title":"PANAS在葡萄牙老年人社会反应样本中的验证","authors":"L. Lemos, Helena Espírito-Santo, Cristiana Duarte-Figueiredo, Diana Santos, Luís Cunha, F. Daniel","doi":"10.31211/rpics.2019.5.2.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Positive and negative affect are two psychobiological dimensions of subjective wellbeing (BES) relevant to the way institutional support is experienced in the lives of many older people. Aim: The study aimed to validate, in the context of institutional support, a brief version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a questionnaire that allows us to evaluate positive and negative affect. Methods: A sample of 389 old adults (61 – 100 years; M = 80.89; SD = 7.48 years) was assessed with the PANAS, Satisfaction With Life Scale, and Geriatric Depression Scale-8. In this sample, the psychometric properties of the PANAS were tested, and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. In the second sample of 383 subjects (60 – 99 years; M = 80.27; SD = 7.87 years), confirmatory factor analysis was executed. Results: A reduced version of PANAS was obtained, with 14 items, a two-dimensional structure, adequate internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity for the Positive Affect/PA and Negative Affect/NA. Temporal stability (interval = 1.44 months) was equally adequate for PA and NA (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an adequate adjustment for the two-dimensional structure of PANAS-14 (AGFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.93; SRMR = 0.05; RMSEA = 0.06; PCLOSE = 0.12). Conclusion: The PANAS-14 is a brief psychometrically suitable tool for the assessment of PA and NA in institutionalized older adults supported by social institutions.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"5 1","pages":"49-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validação da PANAS numa amostra portuguesa de pessoas idosas em resposta social\",\"authors\":\"L. Lemos, Helena Espírito-Santo, Cristiana Duarte-Figueiredo, Diana Santos, Luís Cunha, F. Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.31211/rpics.2019.5.2.160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Positive and negative affect are two psychobiological dimensions of subjective wellbeing (BES) relevant to the way institutional support is experienced in the lives of many older people. Aim: The study aimed to validate, in the context of institutional support, a brief version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a questionnaire that allows us to evaluate positive and negative affect. Methods: A sample of 389 old adults (61 – 100 years; M = 80.89; SD = 7.48 years) was assessed with the PANAS, Satisfaction With Life Scale, and Geriatric Depression Scale-8. In this sample, the psychometric properties of the PANAS were tested, and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. In the second sample of 383 subjects (60 – 99 years; M = 80.27; SD = 7.87 years), confirmatory factor analysis was executed. Results: A reduced version of PANAS was obtained, with 14 items, a two-dimensional structure, adequate internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity for the Positive Affect/PA and Negative Affect/NA. Temporal stability (interval = 1.44 months) was equally adequate for PA and NA (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an adequate adjustment for the two-dimensional structure of PANAS-14 (AGFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.93; SRMR = 0.05; RMSEA = 0.06; PCLOSE = 0.12). Conclusion: The PANAS-14 is a brief psychometrically suitable tool for the assessment of PA and NA in institutionalized older adults supported by social institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"49-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2019.5.2.160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2019.5.2.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:积极和消极影响是主观幸福感(BES)的两个心理生物学维度,与许多老年人在生活中体验机构支持的方式有关。目的:本研究旨在验证,在机构支持的背景下,一个简短版本的积极和消极影响表(PANAS),一个问卷,让我们评估积极和消极的影响。方法:对389名老年人(61 - 100岁;M = 80.89;SD = 7.48岁)采用PANAS、生活满意度量表和老年抑郁量表-8进行评估。在这个样本中,测试了PANAS的心理测量特性,并进行了探索性因素分析。在第二个样本中,383名受试者(60 - 99岁;M = 80.27;SD = 7.87年),进行验证性因子分析。结果:获得了精简版的PANAS,包含14个条目,具有二维结构,积极情感/PA和消极情感/NA具有足够的内部一致性、收敛效度和发散效度。时间稳定性(间隔= 1.44个月)对于PA和NA同样足够(p < 0.001)。验证性因子分析显示,对PANAS-14的二维结构进行了适当的调整(AGFI = 0.91;Cfi = 0.93;Srmr = 0.05;Rmsea = 0.06;Pclose = 0.12)。结论:PANAS-14量表是一种简单的心理测量学工具,适用于社会机构支持的机构老年人的PA和NA的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validação da PANAS numa amostra portuguesa de pessoas idosas em resposta social
Background: Positive and negative affect are two psychobiological dimensions of subjective wellbeing (BES) relevant to the way institutional support is experienced in the lives of many older people. Aim: The study aimed to validate, in the context of institutional support, a brief version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a questionnaire that allows us to evaluate positive and negative affect. Methods: A sample of 389 old adults (61 – 100 years; M = 80.89; SD = 7.48 years) was assessed with the PANAS, Satisfaction With Life Scale, and Geriatric Depression Scale-8. In this sample, the psychometric properties of the PANAS were tested, and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. In the second sample of 383 subjects (60 – 99 years; M = 80.27; SD = 7.87 years), confirmatory factor analysis was executed. Results: A reduced version of PANAS was obtained, with 14 items, a two-dimensional structure, adequate internal consistency, convergent, and divergent validity for the Positive Affect/PA and Negative Affect/NA. Temporal stability (interval = 1.44 months) was equally adequate for PA and NA (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an adequate adjustment for the two-dimensional structure of PANAS-14 (AGFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.93; SRMR = 0.05; RMSEA = 0.06; PCLOSE = 0.12). Conclusion: The PANAS-14 is a brief psychometrically suitable tool for the assessment of PA and NA in institutionalized older adults supported by social institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepção de sorofobia entre homens gays que vivem com HIV Maternidades em terras estrangeiras: Uma scoping review das experiências de mulheres migrantes e refugiadas Cyberloafing in the classroom: A qualitative study with Nigerian undergraduate students Gravidez e depressão pós-parto (DPP): uma revisão não sistemática sobre o estado da arte do conhecimento da DPP Preconceito dos estudantes universitários em relação à deficiência: Um estudo exploratório
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1