接收信息的权利

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Law Library Journal Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.31228/osf.io/za4md

Susan Nevelow Mart

{"title":"接收信息的权利","authors":"Susan Nevelow Mart","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/za4md","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right to Receive Information\",\"authors\":\"Susan Nevelow Mart\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/za4md\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Library Journal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"175-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Library Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/za4md\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/za4md","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

玛特女士考察了信息接收权的法律演变，特别关注其在图书馆中的应用，从最高法院对教育委员会诉皮科案的裁决开始，然后是在各种图书馆相关背景下考虑皮科含义的案例。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Right to Receive Information

Ms. Mart examines the legal evolution of the right to receive information, particularly focusing on its application to libraries, beginning with the Supreme Court holding in Board of Education v. Pico, and followed by cases that have considered the meaning of Pico in a variety of library-related contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law Library Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

50.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Law Library Journal has been the "official" publication of the Association since 1908. It is published quarterly and distributed to members directly.