残疾在德语欧洲:历史,记忆,文化。由琳达·莱斯考、坦雅·努瑟和凯瑟琳·索雷尔斯编辑。罗切斯特,纽约州:卡姆登之家,2022年。249页+ 4张图片。精装版99.00美元,电子书29.95美元。

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Monatshefte Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3368/m.115.1.110
Carol Poore
{"title":"残疾在德语欧洲:历史,记忆,文化。由琳达·莱斯考、坦雅·努瑟和凯瑟琳·索雷尔斯编辑。罗切斯特,纽约州:卡姆登之家,2022年。249页+ 4张图片。精装版99.00美元,电子书29.95美元。","authors":"Carol Poore","doi":"10.3368/m.115.1.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ising question whether dreams are gendered in Middle High German narrative literature. While she never truly answers this question, Tuczay’s study reveals the different characteristics and functions of dreams in this literary tradition: prophetic and false, warning and healing, allegorical and biblical, and political. Three essays deserve special attention for their emphasis upon the didactic function of imagination. Robert Landau Ames’s and Edward Currie’s essays situate the discourse of two very different texts within the Mirror for Princes tradition. Ames investigates the depiction of the monstrous King Zahhāk in the Arabic Shāhnāmah (Book of Kings) by Firdawsı̄, showing how the Persian audience was to learn about good kingship through the vile and monstrous behavior of a bad king. Through a detailed discussion of council in the digressions found in the text, Currie makes the strong case that the medieval audience was to learn from the pitfalls of monstrous council at the court in Beowulf. Jane Beal sheds light on the didactic function of imagining animals and mythical beings in the medieval bestiary, with special focus on the Aberdeen Bestiary. A memory study of the best kind, Beal’s text reveals that the descriptions and depictions of these animals represented a type of memory work for the medieval audience, a means of contemplating the life of Christ. Much in this volume will be useful to scholars interested in imagination. They will find the most current evaluation of key issues informing the debate around imagination, including the meaning of dreams and travel literature, memory, questions of genre, issues of space, the Other, and reception. The great diversity and the connections among literary traditions and topics found in this collection show the universality of imagination. The book also uncovers varying modes of premodern understanding, interpretation, and reception of medieval and early modern imagination, bringing to light many interpretive issues regarding imagination that warrant further study. For these reasons, this book should figure in any scholar’s or advanced graduate student’s research of the premodern imagination.","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"115 1","pages":"110 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability in German-Speaking Europe: History, Memory, Culture. Edited by Linda Leskau, Tanja Nusser, and Katherine Sorrels. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2022. 249 pages + 4 images. $99.00 hardcover, $29.95 e-book.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Poore\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/m.115.1.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ising question whether dreams are gendered in Middle High German narrative literature. While she never truly answers this question, Tuczay’s study reveals the different characteristics and functions of dreams in this literary tradition: prophetic and false, warning and healing, allegorical and biblical, and political. Three essays deserve special attention for their emphasis upon the didactic function of imagination. Robert Landau Ames’s and Edward Currie’s essays situate the discourse of two very different texts within the Mirror for Princes tradition. Ames investigates the depiction of the monstrous King Zahhāk in the Arabic Shāhnāmah (Book of Kings) by Firdawsı̄, showing how the Persian audience was to learn about good kingship through the vile and monstrous behavior of a bad king. Through a detailed discussion of council in the digressions found in the text, Currie makes the strong case that the medieval audience was to learn from the pitfalls of monstrous council at the court in Beowulf. Jane Beal sheds light on the didactic function of imagining animals and mythical beings in the medieval bestiary, with special focus on the Aberdeen Bestiary. A memory study of the best kind, Beal’s text reveals that the descriptions and depictions of these animals represented a type of memory work for the medieval audience, a means of contemplating the life of Christ. Much in this volume will be useful to scholars interested in imagination. They will find the most current evaluation of key issues informing the debate around imagination, including the meaning of dreams and travel literature, memory, questions of genre, issues of space, the Other, and reception. The great diversity and the connections among literary traditions and topics found in this collection show the universality of imagination. The book also uncovers varying modes of premodern understanding, interpretation, and reception of medieval and early modern imagination, bringing to light many interpretive issues regarding imagination that warrant further study. For these reasons, this book should figure in any scholar’s or advanced graduate student’s research of the premodern imagination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monatshefte\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monatshefte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中古高地德语叙事文学中,梦是否有性别的问题。虽然她从未真正回答过这个问题,但图扎伊的研究揭示了梦在这一文学传统中的不同特征和功能:预言和虚假,警告和治愈,寓言和圣经,以及政治。有三篇文章强调了想象力的教学功能,值得特别注意。罗伯特·朗道·艾姆斯和爱德华·柯里的文章将两种截然不同的文本置于《王子之镜》的传统中。艾姆斯研究了firdawsuria在阿拉伯语Shāhnāmah(《列王记》)中对怪物国王Zahhāk的描述,展示了波斯观众如何通过一个坏国王的邪恶和可怕的行为来了解好的王权。通过在文本中发现的离题中对会议的详细讨论,Currie提出了一个强有力的案例,即中世纪的观众应该从贝奥武夫宫廷中可怕的会议的陷阱中吸取教训。简·比尔揭示了想象动物和神话人物在中世纪动物寓言中的教学功能,特别关注阿伯丁动物寓言。一个最好的记忆研究,Beal的文本揭示了对这些动物的描述和描绘代表了中世纪观众的一种记忆工作,一种思考基督生活的方式。这本书中的许多内容将对对想象力感兴趣的学者有用。他们将发现对关键问题的最新评估,这些问题包括梦和旅行文学的意义、记忆、体裁问题、空间问题、他者和接受。文学传统和主题之间的巨大多样性和联系显示了想象力的普遍性。这本书还揭示了不同模式的前现代的理解,解释,并接受中世纪和早期现代的想象力,带来了许多关于想象力的解释问题,值得进一步研究。由于这些原因,这本书应该出现在任何学者或高级研究生的研究前现代的想象力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disability in German-Speaking Europe: History, Memory, Culture. Edited by Linda Leskau, Tanja Nusser, and Katherine Sorrels. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2022. 249 pages + 4 images. $99.00 hardcover, $29.95 e-book.
ising question whether dreams are gendered in Middle High German narrative literature. While she never truly answers this question, Tuczay’s study reveals the different characteristics and functions of dreams in this literary tradition: prophetic and false, warning and healing, allegorical and biblical, and political. Three essays deserve special attention for their emphasis upon the didactic function of imagination. Robert Landau Ames’s and Edward Currie’s essays situate the discourse of two very different texts within the Mirror for Princes tradition. Ames investigates the depiction of the monstrous King Zahhāk in the Arabic Shāhnāmah (Book of Kings) by Firdawsı̄, showing how the Persian audience was to learn about good kingship through the vile and monstrous behavior of a bad king. Through a detailed discussion of council in the digressions found in the text, Currie makes the strong case that the medieval audience was to learn from the pitfalls of monstrous council at the court in Beowulf. Jane Beal sheds light on the didactic function of imagining animals and mythical beings in the medieval bestiary, with special focus on the Aberdeen Bestiary. A memory study of the best kind, Beal’s text reveals that the descriptions and depictions of these animals represented a type of memory work for the medieval audience, a means of contemplating the life of Christ. Much in this volume will be useful to scholars interested in imagination. They will find the most current evaluation of key issues informing the debate around imagination, including the meaning of dreams and travel literature, memory, questions of genre, issues of space, the Other, and reception. The great diversity and the connections among literary traditions and topics found in this collection show the universality of imagination. The book also uncovers varying modes of premodern understanding, interpretation, and reception of medieval and early modern imagination, bringing to light many interpretive issues regarding imagination that warrant further study. For these reasons, this book should figure in any scholar’s or advanced graduate student’s research of the premodern imagination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monatshefte
Monatshefte LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The Journalist as Producer: Mapping the Scene Der Journalist als Menschentypus. Walter Benjamin und der Professionalisierungsdiskurs um 1930 Walter Benjamin and the Networks of the Frankfurter Zeitung Writing at the End: Benjamin, Kraus, and the Image of Journalism Benjamins zeitdiagnostische Rezensionstätigkeit zwischen Text und Kontexten. Exemplarische Analysen eines Spannungsverhältnisses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1