魏玛在普林斯顿:托马斯·曼和卡勒圈子。斯坦利·康戈尔德著。纽约:布卢姆斯伯里学术出版社,2022。xiii + 192 Seiten。精装本81.00美元,平装本24.25美元,电子书19.40美元。

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Monatshefte Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3368/m.115.1.128
Stefan Keppler-Tasaki
{"title":"魏玛在普林斯顿:托马斯·曼和卡勒圈子。斯坦利·康戈尔德著。纽约:布卢姆斯伯里学术出版社,2022。xiii + 192 Seiten。精装本81.00美元,平装本24.25美元,电子书19.40美元。","authors":"Stefan Keppler-Tasaki","doi":"10.3368/m.115.1.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"postwar editions of his works emphasized the transatlantic connection further. Mann’s postwar status was shaped by forces outside of Germany. Soon, however, political developments required once again that Mann reconceive his role in the global literary community. The Cold War politicized world literature, reshaping it from a commons of many cultures to a binary construct juxtaposing two worldviews and value systems—East and West, Communism and capitalism—and writers were expected to stand with one or the other. In the U.S., “official circles turned away from” (249) Mann when he would not unequivocally denounce Communism but promoted peace with the Soviet Union. Accusations of being a Communist sympathizer did not hurt his position as a cultural leader, yet ultimately prompted him to leave the U.S. for Switzerland in 1952. Back in Europe, he used his final years to promote again the image of the writer as independent of political and social developments and as a champion of humanity—as he had done in the 1930s. The five interludes of Thomas Mann’s War are dedicated to works published between 1938 and 1948, which Boes links to Mann’s shifting self-image in a world where cultural and literary communities were in flux. Boes argues, for instance, that with Lotte in Weimar Mann proposed that the role of the representative writer does not rely on personal experience, but is a construct of literary criticism and other cultural forces over time. Just how correct this assessment was has become clear in the wake of the publication of Mann’s diaries starting in 1975: revealing his sexual interest in men, it shifted the focus from Mann’s public to his private life and changed the reception of his works, biography, and public engagement. Thomas Mann’s War is a fascinating read and an important contribution to Mann scholarship. Moreover, it furthers our understandings of the dynamics effecting shifts in twentieth-century cultural, political, and media landscapes, of the manner in which the perception of writers is shaped, and of their role in creating and defending an autonomous artistic and literary sphere. The subject of the émigré writer during times of war and authoritarian governments is most topical today. Boes’s excellent study is highly interdisciplinary, and its jargon-free language makes it accessible to a broad audience. Some prior familiarity with Mann’s biography is helpful to fully appreciate the intricacies of the dynamics Boes describes. The book will appeal to academics and non-academics interested in history, politics, culture, and media, and scholars will welcome the extensive bibliography and index.","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"20 1","pages":"128 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weimar in Princeton: Thomas Mann and the Kahler Circle. By Stanley Corngold. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. xiii + 192 Seiten. $81.00 hardcover, $24.25 paperback, $19.40 e-book.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Keppler-Tasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/m.115.1.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"postwar editions of his works emphasized the transatlantic connection further. Mann’s postwar status was shaped by forces outside of Germany. Soon, however, political developments required once again that Mann reconceive his role in the global literary community. The Cold War politicized world literature, reshaping it from a commons of many cultures to a binary construct juxtaposing two worldviews and value systems—East and West, Communism and capitalism—and writers were expected to stand with one or the other. In the U.S., “official circles turned away from” (249) Mann when he would not unequivocally denounce Communism but promoted peace with the Soviet Union. Accusations of being a Communist sympathizer did not hurt his position as a cultural leader, yet ultimately prompted him to leave the U.S. for Switzerland in 1952. Back in Europe, he used his final years to promote again the image of the writer as independent of political and social developments and as a champion of humanity—as he had done in the 1930s. The five interludes of Thomas Mann’s War are dedicated to works published between 1938 and 1948, which Boes links to Mann’s shifting self-image in a world where cultural and literary communities were in flux. Boes argues, for instance, that with Lotte in Weimar Mann proposed that the role of the representative writer does not rely on personal experience, but is a construct of literary criticism and other cultural forces over time. Just how correct this assessment was has become clear in the wake of the publication of Mann’s diaries starting in 1975: revealing his sexual interest in men, it shifted the focus from Mann’s public to his private life and changed the reception of his works, biography, and public engagement. Thomas Mann’s War is a fascinating read and an important contribution to Mann scholarship. Moreover, it furthers our understandings of the dynamics effecting shifts in twentieth-century cultural, political, and media landscapes, of the manner in which the perception of writers is shaped, and of their role in creating and defending an autonomous artistic and literary sphere. The subject of the émigré writer during times of war and authoritarian governments is most topical today. Boes’s excellent study is highly interdisciplinary, and its jargon-free language makes it accessible to a broad audience. Some prior familiarity with Mann’s biography is helpful to fully appreciate the intricacies of the dynamics Boes describes. The book will appeal to academics and non-academics interested in history, politics, culture, and media, and scholars will welcome the extensive bibliography and index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monatshefte\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monatshefte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他作品的战后版本进一步强调了大西洋两岸的联系。曼恩的战后地位是由德国以外的力量塑造的。然而,不久之后,政治形势的发展再次要求曼重新思考他在全球文学界的角色。冷战将世界文学政治化,将其从许多文化的共同性重塑为并列的两种世界观和价值体系——东方和西方,共产主义和资本主义——的二元结构,作家被期望站在其中一个或另一个。在美国,当曼恩不明确谴责共产主义,而是促进与苏联的和平时,“官方圈子对他敬而远之”(249)。被指控为共产主义同情者并没有损害他作为文化领袖的地位,但最终还是促使他在1952年离开美国前往瑞士。回到欧洲后,他在生命的最后几年里再次塑造了作家独立于政治和社会发展之外、捍卫人性的形象——就像他在20世纪30年代所做的那样。托马斯·曼的《战争》中有五个插曲,专门介绍了1938年至1948年间出版的作品,博斯认为这与曼在一个文化和文学界不断变化的世界中不断变化的自我形象有关。例如,Boes认为,在魏玛,Mann提出代表性作家的角色不依赖于个人经验,而是文学批评和其他文化力量随着时间的推移而构建的。随着1975年曼恩日记的出版,这种评价的正确性变得清晰起来:日记揭示了曼恩对男性的性兴趣,将焦点从曼恩的公共生活转移到他的私人生活,并改变了他的作品、传记和公众参与的接受程度。托马斯·曼的《战争》是一本引人入胜的读物,也是对曼恩学术的重要贡献。此外,它进一步加深了我们对影响20世纪文化、政治和媒体格局变化的动力的理解,对作家的看法形成的方式,以及他们在创造和捍卫自主艺术和文学领域中的作用。战争时期和独裁政府时期的作家是当今最热门的话题。Boes的优秀研究是高度跨学科的,其无术语的语言使其能够被广泛的受众所接受。事先熟悉曼恩的传记有助于充分理解他所描述的错综复杂的动态。这本书将吸引对历史、政治、文化、媒体感兴趣的学者和非学者,学者们将欢迎广泛的参考书目和索引。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weimar in Princeton: Thomas Mann and the Kahler Circle. By Stanley Corngold. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. xiii + 192 Seiten. $81.00 hardcover, $24.25 paperback, $19.40 e-book.
postwar editions of his works emphasized the transatlantic connection further. Mann’s postwar status was shaped by forces outside of Germany. Soon, however, political developments required once again that Mann reconceive his role in the global literary community. The Cold War politicized world literature, reshaping it from a commons of many cultures to a binary construct juxtaposing two worldviews and value systems—East and West, Communism and capitalism—and writers were expected to stand with one or the other. In the U.S., “official circles turned away from” (249) Mann when he would not unequivocally denounce Communism but promoted peace with the Soviet Union. Accusations of being a Communist sympathizer did not hurt his position as a cultural leader, yet ultimately prompted him to leave the U.S. for Switzerland in 1952. Back in Europe, he used his final years to promote again the image of the writer as independent of political and social developments and as a champion of humanity—as he had done in the 1930s. The five interludes of Thomas Mann’s War are dedicated to works published between 1938 and 1948, which Boes links to Mann’s shifting self-image in a world where cultural and literary communities were in flux. Boes argues, for instance, that with Lotte in Weimar Mann proposed that the role of the representative writer does not rely on personal experience, but is a construct of literary criticism and other cultural forces over time. Just how correct this assessment was has become clear in the wake of the publication of Mann’s diaries starting in 1975: revealing his sexual interest in men, it shifted the focus from Mann’s public to his private life and changed the reception of his works, biography, and public engagement. Thomas Mann’s War is a fascinating read and an important contribution to Mann scholarship. Moreover, it furthers our understandings of the dynamics effecting shifts in twentieth-century cultural, political, and media landscapes, of the manner in which the perception of writers is shaped, and of their role in creating and defending an autonomous artistic and literary sphere. The subject of the émigré writer during times of war and authoritarian governments is most topical today. Boes’s excellent study is highly interdisciplinary, and its jargon-free language makes it accessible to a broad audience. Some prior familiarity with Mann’s biography is helpful to fully appreciate the intricacies of the dynamics Boes describes. The book will appeal to academics and non-academics interested in history, politics, culture, and media, and scholars will welcome the extensive bibliography and index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monatshefte
Monatshefte LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The Journalist as Producer: Mapping the Scene Der Journalist als Menschentypus. Walter Benjamin und der Professionalisierungsdiskurs um 1930 Walter Benjamin and the Networks of the Frankfurter Zeitung Writing at the End: Benjamin, Kraus, and the Image of Journalism Benjamins zeitdiagnostische Rezensionstätigkeit zwischen Text und Kontexten. Exemplarische Analysen eines Spannungsverhältnisses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1