杂质测定方法的转移:比较测试、验证、验收标准(评审)

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Drug Development and Registration Pub Date : 2021-05-29 DOI:10.33380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146
N. A. Epshtein
{"title":"杂质测定方法的转移:比较测试、验证、验收标准(评审)","authors":"N. A. Epshtein","doi":"10.33380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Different approaches are used for transfer of impurities determination methods. In most cases, comparative testing of samples or partial validation of methods is performed. At the same time, a number of issues important for practice are still relevant.Text. The features of methods validation and comparative testing of samples during the transfer of impurities determination methods are considered. Potential acceptance criteria – requirements to the permissible difference between results of transmitting and receiving laboratories – are given. The calculation formulas of the TOST test are considered, and the critical condition for the comparative testing of samples is given. The key points that should be taken into account when transferring the methods are discussed.Conclusion. The data and recommendations are presented, which are important for increasing the reliability of the transfer of the impurities determination methods.","PeriodicalId":36465,"journal":{"name":"Drug Development and Registration","volume":"10 1","pages":"137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfer of Impurities Determination Methods: Comparative Testing, Validation, Acceptance Criteria (Review)\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Epshtein\",\"doi\":\"10.33380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Different approaches are used for transfer of impurities determination methods. In most cases, comparative testing of samples or partial validation of methods is performed. At the same time, a number of issues important for practice are still relevant.Text. The features of methods validation and comparative testing of samples during the transfer of impurities determination methods are considered. Potential acceptance criteria – requirements to the permissible difference between results of transmitting and receiving laboratories – are given. The calculation formulas of the TOST test are considered, and the critical condition for the comparative testing of samples is given. The key points that should be taken into account when transferring the methods are discussed.Conclusion. The data and recommendations are presented, which are important for increasing the reliability of the transfer of the impurities determination methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Development and Registration\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"137-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Development and Registration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Development and Registration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2021-10-2-137-146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍。不同的方法用于杂质测定方法的转移。在大多数情况下,对样品进行比较测试或对方法进行部分验证。与此同时,一些对实践很重要的问题仍然是相关的。考虑了杂质测定方法转移过程中方法验证和样品比对试验的特点。给出了潜在的可接受标准——对发送实验室和接收实验室结果之间允许差异的要求。考虑了TOST试验的计算公式,给出了试样对比试验的临界条件。讨论了方法转移时应注意的要点。本文给出的数据和建议对提高杂质测定方法传递的可靠性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transfer of Impurities Determination Methods: Comparative Testing, Validation, Acceptance Criteria (Review)
Introduction. Different approaches are used for transfer of impurities determination methods. In most cases, comparative testing of samples or partial validation of methods is performed. At the same time, a number of issues important for practice are still relevant.Text. The features of methods validation and comparative testing of samples during the transfer of impurities determination methods are considered. Potential acceptance criteria – requirements to the permissible difference between results of transmitting and receiving laboratories – are given. The calculation formulas of the TOST test are considered, and the critical condition for the comparative testing of samples is given. The key points that should be taken into account when transferring the methods are discussed.Conclusion. The data and recommendations are presented, which are important for increasing the reliability of the transfer of the impurities determination methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Development and Registration
Drug Development and Registration Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medicinal Perspectives of Retinoids (Review) End-to-end Standardization of Original Medicines when Determining Related Impurities Development of Amlodipine Mini-tablets as a Polypill-component for the Personalized Therapy of Arterial Hypertension Composition and Technology Development for Obtaining Amorphous Solid Dispersion of Ebastine by Hot Melt Extrusion to Increase Dissolution Rate Could Bioluminescent Bacteria be Used in the Search for New Plant-derived Antibacterial Substances?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1