{"title":"腹腔镜与机器人远端胰腺切除术:综述","authors":"D. Coco, S. Leanza","doi":"10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: review\",\"authors\":\"D. Coco, S. Leanza\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: review
The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
