同一隔间内死亡可作为损伤严重程度的预测因子

Serio F, F. Q, Shah K, McCague A
{"title":"同一隔间内死亡可作为损伤严重程度的预测因子","authors":"Serio F, F. Q, Shah K, McCague A","doi":"10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine if death in same compartment is useful as a predictor for injury severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 525 high-risk automobile accident victims. Data collected from Natividad Medical Center's trauma registry were used to analyze reports of adult patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2017. 15 patients were victims of highrisk accidents with a death in the same compartment. These patients were compared with the other 510 patients. Results: Out of 15 patients who had death in same compartment, 2 (13%) were identified to have ISS>15 and 1 (6.7%) expired. Odds of severe injury (ISS>15) were not significantly different between groups [OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]. Odds of death between the two groups were not significantly different [OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]. Mean ISS between the two groups was not significant [9.1 ± 6.3 vs 8.3 ± 0.7 P=0.8]. Conclusion: \"Death in the same compartment\" has a similar prognostic value to other criteria outlined by the CDC.","PeriodicalId":92736,"journal":{"name":"Trauma & acute care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Death in the Same Compartment as a Predictor for Injury Severity\",\"authors\":\"Serio F, F. Q, Shah K, McCague A\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine if death in same compartment is useful as a predictor for injury severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 525 high-risk automobile accident victims. Data collected from Natividad Medical Center's trauma registry were used to analyze reports of adult patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2017. 15 patients were victims of highrisk accidents with a death in the same compartment. These patients were compared with the other 510 patients. Results: Out of 15 patients who had death in same compartment, 2 (13%) were identified to have ISS>15 and 1 (6.7%) expired. Odds of severe injury (ISS>15) were not significantly different between groups [OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]. Odds of death between the two groups were not significantly different [OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]. Mean ISS between the two groups was not significant [9.1 ± 6.3 vs 8.3 ± 0.7 P=0.8]. Conclusion: \\\"Death in the same compartment\\\" has a similar prognostic value to other criteria outlined by the CDC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma & acute care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma & acute care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma & acute care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定同一间室的死亡是否可作为损伤严重程度和死亡率的预测因子。方法:对525例交通事故高危受害者进行回顾性横断面研究。从Natividad医疗中心的创伤登记处收集的数据用于分析2014年7月1日至2017年7月1日的成人患者报告。15名患者是同一车厢内死亡的高风险事故的受害者。这些患者与其他510例患者进行比较。结果:在同一间室死亡的15例患者中,2例(13%)被确定为ISS bbb15, 1例(6.7%)死亡。两组间严重损伤的发生率(ISS bbb15)无显著差异[OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]。两组患者的死亡几率无显著差异[OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]。两组间平均ISS差异无统计学意义[9.1±6.3 vs 8.3±0.7 P=0.8]。结论:“同一隔室死亡”与CDC概述的其他标准具有相似的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Death in the Same Compartment as a Predictor for Injury Severity
Objective: To determine if death in same compartment is useful as a predictor for injury severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 525 high-risk automobile accident victims. Data collected from Natividad Medical Center's trauma registry were used to analyze reports of adult patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2017. 15 patients were victims of highrisk accidents with a death in the same compartment. These patients were compared with the other 510 patients. Results: Out of 15 patients who had death in same compartment, 2 (13%) were identified to have ISS>15 and 1 (6.7%) expired. Odds of severe injury (ISS>15) were not significantly different between groups [OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]. Odds of death between the two groups were not significantly different [OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]. Mean ISS between the two groups was not significant [9.1 ± 6.3 vs 8.3 ± 0.7 P=0.8]. Conclusion: "Death in the same compartment" has a similar prognostic value to other criteria outlined by the CDC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Death in the Same Compartment as a Predictor for Injury Severity Implementation of an Interactive Tablet-based Educational Intervention in the Neurotrauma Clinic: A 1-year Retrospective Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1