以英语为母语的法律文化与全球化:国家、公司和技术

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Globalization Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.30884/jogs/2019.01.05
Joseph P. Garske
{"title":"以英语为母语的法律文化与全球化:国家、公司和技术","authors":"Joseph P. Garske","doi":"10.30884/jogs/2019.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets forth a way to understand, how technology has enabled Anglophone legality to employ, both the structure of the state and the structure of the corporation in its project of globalization. The paper does so by comparing the origins, development, and fundamental differences between the two Western legal forms, Civil and Common. It describes Civil law as a philosophical system, and Common law as a collegial system. This comparative approach is used to explain how Civil law is assimilated to the state, and how its Anglophone counterpart holds a position of equal and independent predominance toward both state and corporation. It shows how pragmatic adaptability is an advantage for the English method in constructing a global legal culture.","PeriodicalId":36579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Globalization Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anglophone Legal Culture and Globalization: State, Corporation, and Technology\",\"authors\":\"Joseph P. Garske\",\"doi\":\"10.30884/jogs/2019.01.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper sets forth a way to understand, how technology has enabled Anglophone legality to employ, both the structure of the state and the structure of the corporation in its project of globalization. The paper does so by comparing the origins, development, and fundamental differences between the two Western legal forms, Civil and Common. It describes Civil law as a philosophical system, and Common law as a collegial system. This comparative approach is used to explain how Civil law is assimilated to the state, and how its Anglophone counterpart holds a position of equal and independent predominance toward both state and corporation. It shows how pragmatic adaptability is an advantage for the English method in constructing a global legal culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Globalization Studies\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Globalization Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2019.01.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Globalization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2019.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文提出了一种理解技术如何使英语国家的合法性在其全球化项目中运用国家结构和公司结构的方法。本文通过比较西方两种法律形式——民法和普通法的起源、发展和根本区别来实现这一目标。它将民法描述为一种哲学体系,将普通法描述为一种合议制体系。这种比较方法被用来解释民法是如何被国家同化的,以及它的英语对口法是如何在国家和公司中占据平等和独立的优势地位的。这表明,在构建全球法律文化的过程中,语用适应性是英语方法的一大优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anglophone Legal Culture and Globalization: State, Corporation, and Technology
This paper sets forth a way to understand, how technology has enabled Anglophone legality to employ, both the structure of the state and the structure of the corporation in its project of globalization. The paper does so by comparing the origins, development, and fundamental differences between the two Western legal forms, Civil and Common. It describes Civil law as a philosophical system, and Common law as a collegial system. This comparative approach is used to explain how Civil law is assimilated to the state, and how its Anglophone counterpart holds a position of equal and independent predominance toward both state and corporation. It shows how pragmatic adaptability is an advantage for the English method in constructing a global legal culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Globalization Studies
Journal of Globalization Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Contradictions between Islamists in the Regional and Global Context: Wahhabis, Muslim Brothers, and al-Qaeda A Globalization Project in Practice? The EU's Cultural and Educational Activities in Azerbaijan in the Framework of the Eastern Partnership Programme Covid-19, Globalization and Strengthening Authoritarianism in the Middle East A Crude and Simple Calculus: Lessons for the CCP from COVID-19 The Global Crisis and the USA Search for Its New Identity: Trump's Attempt of Transition from Globalism to Isolationism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1