反对现代性:Emil Staiger, Michail Lifshitz和Hans Sedlmayr的概念。第1部分

A. Angelov
{"title":"反对现代性:Emil Staiger, Michail Lifshitz和Hans Sedlmayr的概念。第1部分","authors":"A. Angelov","doi":"10.31861/PYTLIT2019.99.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives of the paper: 1) To analyse Emil Staiger’s theoretical position and to reveal the reason I consider it anti-modern; 2) To compare his position to the one maintained by some ideologists of socialist realism in the same decade, and to outline similarities and differences. I pay more attention to the antimodernist and concept of Michail Al. Lifshitz; 3) To ground my opinion that the ideology of socialist realism in the 1960-ies is also anti-modern; 4) To expand the analysis with a brief introduction of Hans Sedlmayr’s attitude, and to explain why it is anti-modern as well; 5) To give an answer to the question what the social function of the anti-modern attitude is. I use a critical comparative approach to the original sources, asking for the social functions of the analysed concepts. The paper is a part of a monograph in progress on the works of Emil Staiger and on some anti-modern concepts in the reflexion on literature and on visual art in West and in the East of Europe in the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":32028,"journal":{"name":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Modernity: the concepts of Emil Staiger, Michail Lifshitz and Hans Sedlmayr. Part 1\",\"authors\":\"A. Angelov\",\"doi\":\"10.31861/PYTLIT2019.99.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives of the paper: 1) To analyse Emil Staiger’s theoretical position and to reveal the reason I consider it anti-modern; 2) To compare his position to the one maintained by some ideologists of socialist realism in the same decade, and to outline similarities and differences. I pay more attention to the antimodernist and concept of Michail Al. Lifshitz; 3) To ground my opinion that the ideology of socialist realism in the 1960-ies is also anti-modern; 4) To expand the analysis with a brief introduction of Hans Sedlmayr’s attitude, and to explain why it is anti-modern as well; 5) To give an answer to the question what the social function of the anti-modern attitude is. I use a critical comparative approach to the original sources, asking for the social functions of the analysed concepts. The paper is a part of a monograph in progress on the works of Emil Staiger and on some anti-modern concepts in the reflexion on literature and on visual art in West and in the East of Europe in the 20th century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31861/PYTLIT2019.99.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31861/PYTLIT2019.99.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的:1)分析斯塔格的理论立场,揭示我认为其反现代的原因;(2)将他的观点与同时期一些社会主义现实主义思想家的观点进行比较,并找出两者的异同。我更关注Michail Al. Lifshitz的反现代主义和概念;3)使我认为20世纪60年代的社会主义现实主义意识形态也是反现代的;4)通过简要介绍汉斯·塞德迈尔的态度来展开分析,并解释为什么它也是反现代的;5)回答反现代态度的社会功能是什么。我使用一种批判的比较方法对原始来源,要求分析概念的社会功能。这篇论文是一本正在进行的专著的一部分,该专著是关于埃米尔·斯塔格的作品以及20世纪西欧和东欧对文学和视觉艺术反思中的一些反现代概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Against Modernity: the concepts of Emil Staiger, Michail Lifshitz and Hans Sedlmayr. Part 1
Objectives of the paper: 1) To analyse Emil Staiger’s theoretical position and to reveal the reason I consider it anti-modern; 2) To compare his position to the one maintained by some ideologists of socialist realism in the same decade, and to outline similarities and differences. I pay more attention to the antimodernist and concept of Michail Al. Lifshitz; 3) To ground my opinion that the ideology of socialist realism in the 1960-ies is also anti-modern; 4) To expand the analysis with a brief introduction of Hans Sedlmayr’s attitude, and to explain why it is anti-modern as well; 5) To give an answer to the question what the social function of the anti-modern attitude is. I use a critical comparative approach to the original sources, asking for the social functions of the analysed concepts. The paper is a part of a monograph in progress on the works of Emil Staiger and on some anti-modern concepts in the reflexion on literature and on visual art in West and in the East of Europe in the 20th century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prohibited Literature A Man-Paradox in the World of Paradoxes Paul Celan’s Collection of Poetry “Poppy and Destiny”: the Story of a Literary Breakthrough Characters of Fairy Tales, Fantasy and Magical Food in Cooking Reality Shows: The Intersection of Literary Culture and Media Communications Destinies of the State and its Writers in History. Dimensions of Their Tragedy and Success in Lithuanian Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1