{"title":"不攀登的政客","authors":"Martina Gračanin-Yuksek","doi":"10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the behavior of clitics in subject- versus object-control infinitival constructions is explained by arguing that the two constructions have different structures. I argue that object-control infinitival constructions are CPs, and are therefore structurally richer than subject-control infinitival constructions, which are TPs and do not involve a CP projection. This results in different behavior of the clititcs in the two configurations.","PeriodicalId":51986,"journal":{"name":"Rasprave","volume":"45 1","pages":"401-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clitics that Don't Climb\",\"authors\":\"Martina Gračanin-Yuksek\",\"doi\":\"10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article the behavior of clitics in subject- versus object-control infinitival constructions is explained by arguing that the two constructions have different structures. I argue that object-control infinitival constructions are CPs, and are therefore structurally richer than subject-control infinitival constructions, which are TPs and do not involve a CP projection. This results in different behavior of the clititcs in the two configurations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rasprave\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"401-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rasprave\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rasprave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.45.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article the behavior of clitics in subject- versus object-control infinitival constructions is explained by arguing that the two constructions have different structures. I argue that object-control infinitival constructions are CPs, and are therefore structurally richer than subject-control infinitival constructions, which are TPs and do not involve a CP projection. This results in different behavior of the clititcs in the two configurations.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
