{"title":"原发不明的转移性腺癌的临床病理特征和临床结果:单一中心的经验","authors":"F. Gürler, Aysegul Ilhan Güleşen, B. Öksüzoğlu","doi":"10.37047/jos.2022-91381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of site-specific therapy (SST) in patients with metastatic ade- nocarcinoma of unknown primary (MACUP). Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients diagnosed with MACUP. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of SST were evaluated. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The median age was 61.5 (minimum-maximum: 31.1-76.1) years, and 40.0% of the patients (n=24) were 65 years or older. The progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-5.7] with the first-line treatment in the whole group. The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.9-5.2), 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.3), and 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-12.6) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. The overall survival (mOS) was 14.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-18.8) in the whole group. The mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-14.3), 8.5 months (95% CI: 3.8-13.2), and 15.5 months (95% CI: 9.3-18.8) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with colorectal-derived can- cers of our cohort, considered as a “more sensitive” type, seemed to benefit more from immunohistochemistry-based (IHC-based) SST. However, SST determination using genomic profiling is a gold standard, and IHC also offered valuable information.","PeriodicalId":31838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary: A Single Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"F. Gürler, Aysegul Ilhan Güleşen, B. Öksüzoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.37047/jos.2022-91381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of site-specific therapy (SST) in patients with metastatic ade- nocarcinoma of unknown primary (MACUP). Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients diagnosed with MACUP. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of SST were evaluated. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The median age was 61.5 (minimum-maximum: 31.1-76.1) years, and 40.0% of the patients (n=24) were 65 years or older. The progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-5.7] with the first-line treatment in the whole group. The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.9-5.2), 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.3), and 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-12.6) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. The overall survival (mOS) was 14.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-18.8) in the whole group. The mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-14.3), 8.5 months (95% CI: 3.8-13.2), and 15.5 months (95% CI: 9.3-18.8) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with colorectal-derived can- cers of our cohort, considered as a “more sensitive” type, seemed to benefit more from immunohistochemistry-based (IHC-based) SST. However, SST determination using genomic profiling is a gold standard, and IHC also offered valuable information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2022-91381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2022-91381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary: A Single Center Experience
ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of site-specific therapy (SST) in patients with metastatic ade- nocarcinoma of unknown primary (MACUP). Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients diagnosed with MACUP. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of SST were evaluated. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The median age was 61.5 (minimum-maximum: 31.1-76.1) years, and 40.0% of the patients (n=24) were 65 years or older. The progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-5.7] with the first-line treatment in the whole group. The mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.9-5.2), 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.3), and 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-12.6) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. The overall survival (mOS) was 14.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-18.8) in the whole group. The mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-14.3), 8.5 months (95% CI: 3.8-13.2), and 15.5 months (95% CI: 9.3-18.8) in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin, carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with colorectal-derived can- cers of our cohort, considered as a “more sensitive” type, seemed to benefit more from immunohistochemistry-based (IHC-based) SST. However, SST determination using genomic profiling is a gold standard, and IHC also offered valuable information.