D. Klein, Daniel Batista, Josué Sebastiany Kunzler, Janaina Martins de Medeiros, Rafaela dos Santos Spagnol, H. C. M. Muniz, A. B. D. Quadros, Amanda D’avila Verardi, V. de Oliveira
{"title":"免疫阉割母猪的社会性和摄食行为","authors":"D. Klein, Daniel Batista, Josué Sebastiany Kunzler, Janaina Martins de Medeiros, Rafaela dos Santos Spagnol, H. C. M. Muniz, A. B. D. Quadros, Amanda D’avila Verardi, V. de Oliveira","doi":"10.37496/rbz5120200183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- This study compared the social and feeding behaviour of immunocastrated female pigs using different immunocastration protocols. We used seventy-two gilts from industrial crossbreeding (Agroceres × Topigs) at 15 weeks of age. The pigs were distributed in a randomised design with three treatments. The second dose of the immunocastration vaccine was applied in two groups, six weeks before slaughter (I6) and four weeks before slaughter (I4). A non-immunised group (NI) was used for comparison. Due to the divergence in the time of immunisation between the two groups, an individual comparison of each immunocastrated group with the control group (NI vs . I6 and NI vs. I4) was performed. Social behaviour was analysed through the collection of images by a monitoring camera, and the analysis period was from 6:00 to 18:00 h, with behaviour observed every ten minutes. Feeding behaviour data were collected by the automated FIRE ® system. Anti-GnRH immunisation and the different protocols of application did not influence most social and feeding behaviours.","PeriodicalId":49614,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunocastrated female pigs’ social and feeding behaviour\",\"authors\":\"D. Klein, Daniel Batista, Josué Sebastiany Kunzler, Janaina Martins de Medeiros, Rafaela dos Santos Spagnol, H. C. M. Muniz, A. B. D. Quadros, Amanda D’avila Verardi, V. de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.37496/rbz5120200183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- This study compared the social and feeding behaviour of immunocastrated female pigs using different immunocastration protocols. We used seventy-two gilts from industrial crossbreeding (Agroceres × Topigs) at 15 weeks of age. The pigs were distributed in a randomised design with three treatments. The second dose of the immunocastration vaccine was applied in two groups, six weeks before slaughter (I6) and four weeks before slaughter (I4). A non-immunised group (NI) was used for comparison. Due to the divergence in the time of immunisation between the two groups, an individual comparison of each immunocastrated group with the control group (NI vs . I6 and NI vs. I4) was performed. Social behaviour was analysed through the collection of images by a monitoring camera, and the analysis period was from 6:00 to 18:00 h, with behaviour observed every ten minutes. Feeding behaviour data were collected by the automated FIRE ® system. Anti-GnRH immunisation and the different protocols of application did not influence most social and feeding behaviours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120200183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120200183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
-本研究比较了采用不同免疫阉割方案的免疫阉割母猪的社交和摄食行为。我们选用72头15周龄的工业杂交(Agroceres × Topigs)后备母猪。试验猪采用随机设计,分为3个处理。第二剂免疫去势疫苗分为两组,分别在屠宰前6周(I6)和屠宰前4周(I4)接种。采用未免疫组(NI)进行比较。由于两组之间免疫接种时间的差异,每个免疫阉割组与对照组(NI vs . NI)的个体比较。I6和NI对I4)。社会行为通过监控摄像机采集图像进行分析,分析时段为6:00 - 18:00 h,每十分钟观察一次行为。取食行为数据由自动FIRE®系统收集。抗gnrh免疫和不同的应用方案不影响大多数社会和喂养行为。
Immunocastrated female pigs’ social and feeding behaviour
- This study compared the social and feeding behaviour of immunocastrated female pigs using different immunocastration protocols. We used seventy-two gilts from industrial crossbreeding (Agroceres × Topigs) at 15 weeks of age. The pigs were distributed in a randomised design with three treatments. The second dose of the immunocastration vaccine was applied in two groups, six weeks before slaughter (I6) and four weeks before slaughter (I4). A non-immunised group (NI) was used for comparison. Due to the divergence in the time of immunisation between the two groups, an individual comparison of each immunocastrated group with the control group (NI vs . I6 and NI vs. I4) was performed. Social behaviour was analysed through the collection of images by a monitoring camera, and the analysis period was from 6:00 to 18:00 h, with behaviour observed every ten minutes. Feeding behaviour data were collected by the automated FIRE ® system. Anti-GnRH immunisation and the different protocols of application did not influence most social and feeding behaviours.
期刊介绍:
The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ; Brazilian Journal of Animal Science) encompasses all fields of Animal Science Research. The RBZ publishes original scientific articles in the areas of Aquaculture, Biometeorology and Animal Welfare, Forage Crops and Grasslands, Animal and Forage Plants Breeding and Genetics, Animal Reproduction, Ruminant and Non-Ruminant Nutrition, and Animal Production Systems and Agribusiness.