新冠肺炎疫情下城市形态的失败:走向更公正的城市主义

IF 1.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES TOWN PLANNING REVIEW Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3828/tpr.2020.42
Yosef Jabareen, E. Eizenberg
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情下城市形态的失败:走向更公正的城市主义","authors":"Yosef Jabareen, E. Eizenberg","doi":"10.3828/tpr.2020.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting mandatory socio-spatial practices trigger and pose some critical questions on the prevailing conventions of spatial planning approaches and the ways they shape our cities Most salient in this regard, though not exclusive, are the dominant planning approaches and movements of recent decades, such as New Urbanism and the various sustainability-related spatial-planning paradigms These approaches rely on the spatial aspects of density and compactness as mitigation and adaptation measures, aiming to achieve better social experiences in cities and to cope with climate change and its uncertainties Therefore, in the context of the current pandemic, we raise questions about the functioning, flexibility, structure, physical typologies and crisis-adaptation capacities of the existing urban form in cities around the world","PeriodicalId":47547,"journal":{"name":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"1 1","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The failure of urban forms under the COVID-19 epidemic: towards a more just urbanism\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Jabareen, E. Eizenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/tpr.2020.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting mandatory socio-spatial practices trigger and pose some critical questions on the prevailing conventions of spatial planning approaches and the ways they shape our cities Most salient in this regard, though not exclusive, are the dominant planning approaches and movements of recent decades, such as New Urbanism and the various sustainability-related spatial-planning paradigms These approaches rely on the spatial aspects of density and compactness as mitigation and adaptation measures, aiming to achieve better social experiences in cities and to cope with climate change and its uncertainties Therefore, in the context of the current pandemic, we raise questions about the functioning, flexibility, structure, physical typologies and crisis-adaptation capacities of the existing urban form in cities around the world\",\"PeriodicalId\":47547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

冠状病毒大流行的爆发以及由此产生的强制性社会空间实践,引发并对空间规划方法的普遍惯例及其塑造城市的方式提出了一些关键问题,在这方面,最突出的(尽管并非排他的)是近几十年来占主导地位的规划方法和运动,这些方法依赖于密度和紧凑性的空间方面作为缓解和适应措施,旨在改善城市的社会体验,应对气候变化及其不确定性。因此,在当前大流行的背景下,我们提出了关于功能、灵活性、结构、世界各地城市现有城市形态的物理类型学和危机适应能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The failure of urban forms under the COVID-19 epidemic: towards a more just urbanism
The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting mandatory socio-spatial practices trigger and pose some critical questions on the prevailing conventions of spatial planning approaches and the ways they shape our cities Most salient in this regard, though not exclusive, are the dominant planning approaches and movements of recent decades, such as New Urbanism and the various sustainability-related spatial-planning paradigms These approaches rely on the spatial aspects of density and compactness as mitigation and adaptation measures, aiming to achieve better social experiences in cities and to cope with climate change and its uncertainties Therefore, in the context of the current pandemic, we raise questions about the functioning, flexibility, structure, physical typologies and crisis-adaptation capacities of the existing urban form in cities around the world
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Town Planning Review has been one of the world"s leading journals of urban and regional planning since its foundation in 1910. With an extensive international readership, TPR is a well established urban and regional planning journal, providing a principal forum for communication between researchers and students, policy analysts and practitioners. To mark TPR’s centenary in 2010, it is proposed to publish a series of ‘Centenary Papers’ -- review papers that record and reflect on the state of the art in a range of topics in the general field of town and regional planning.
期刊最新文献
Mind the widening ‘theory–practice gap’? The retreat to positivism in planning practice International academic conference: Urban and Rural Research in Peru and Latin America, I CIUR 2022: advances, challenges and prospects Does tourism chase the living culture? Singapore’s Kampong Glam and Geylang Serai 55th Universities’ Transport Study Group (UTSG) Annual Conference, Cardiff, UK, 10–12 July 2023 Index to Volume 94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1