机器人辅助胸外科手术:当前文献综述

Charles D Ghee, W. Vigneswaran
{"title":"机器人辅助胸外科手术:当前文献综述","authors":"Charles D Ghee, W. Vigneswaran","doi":"10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Minimally invasive surgical approaches are generally desired and recommended for many thoracic procedures as they preserve function and allow for more rapid recovery of patients. Despite these advantages, the adaptation has been poor. The robotic approach allowing more intuitive movement, greater flexibility, and high definition 3D vision appears to encourage surgeons to adapt the technique. Methods: This review examines the recent English lit of the early surgical experience of the da Vinci robotic system in the treatment of lung cancer, esophageal resection and mediastinal pathology. Conclusion: The application of robotic technology to thoracic surgery has proven to be at least comparable to open or video assisted thoracoscopic techniques in several areas and in some, possibly superior. If the widespread application of robotic technology allows greater access to minimally invasive thoracic surgery, with equivalent or superior oncological and perioperative outcomes, then it seems logical that robotic technique will become the standard for many general thoracic surgical procedures.","PeriodicalId":79324,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot assisted thoracic surgery: a review of current literature\",\"authors\":\"Charles D Ghee, W. Vigneswaran\",\"doi\":\"10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Minimally invasive surgical approaches are generally desired and recommended for many thoracic procedures as they preserve function and allow for more rapid recovery of patients. Despite these advantages, the adaptation has been poor. The robotic approach allowing more intuitive movement, greater flexibility, and high definition 3D vision appears to encourage surgeons to adapt the technique. Methods: This review examines the recent English lit of the early surgical experience of the da Vinci robotic system in the treatment of lung cancer, esophageal resection and mediastinal pathology. Conclusion: The application of robotic technology to thoracic surgery has proven to be at least comparable to open or video assisted thoracoscopic techniques in several areas and in some, possibly superior. If the widespread application of robotic technology allows greater access to minimally invasive thoracic surgery, with equivalent or superior oncological and perioperative outcomes, then it seems logical that robotic technique will become the standard for many general thoracic surgical procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创手术方法通常是理想的,并且被推荐用于许多胸外科手术,因为它们可以保留功能并允许患者更快地恢复。尽管有这些优势,但适应性一直很差。机器人方法允许更直观的运动,更大的灵活性和高清晰度3D视觉,似乎鼓励外科医生适应这项技术。方法:本文回顾了近年来达芬奇机器人系统在肺癌、食管切除术和纵隔病理治疗中的早期手术经验。结论:机器人技术在胸外科手术中的应用已被证明至少在某些领域可与开放式或视频辅助胸腔镜技术相媲美,甚至在某些领域更胜一筹。如果机器人技术的广泛应用可以使微创胸外科手术获得更多的机会,并具有同等或更好的肿瘤和围手术期效果,那么机器人技术将成为许多普通胸外科手术的标准,这似乎是合乎逻辑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot assisted thoracic surgery: a review of current literature
Background: Minimally invasive surgical approaches are generally desired and recommended for many thoracic procedures as they preserve function and allow for more rapid recovery of patients. Despite these advantages, the adaptation has been poor. The robotic approach allowing more intuitive movement, greater flexibility, and high definition 3D vision appears to encourage surgeons to adapt the technique. Methods: This review examines the recent English lit of the early surgical experience of the da Vinci robotic system in the treatment of lung cancer, esophageal resection and mediastinal pathology. Conclusion: The application of robotic technology to thoracic surgery has proven to be at least comparable to open or video assisted thoracoscopic techniques in several areas and in some, possibly superior. If the widespread application of robotic technology allows greater access to minimally invasive thoracic surgery, with equivalent or superior oncological and perioperative outcomes, then it seems logical that robotic technique will become the standard for many general thoracic surgical procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Unusual Mechanism of Myocardial Infarction in Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Hodgkin’s Disease and Pericardial Effusion Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency Bentall-De Bono Technique in the Ascending Aorta Aneurysm, Aortic Regurgitation, and Coronary Reimplantation Valvular Commitment in Hunter Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1